Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let i:Z→X be a closed immersion of schemes (Closed immersions of schemes) and let F be a quasi-coherent OZ-module (Quasi-coherent module on a scheme), with direct image i∗F (Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map, Direct image preserves sheaves and objectwise algebraic structure). Then for every q≥0 there is a canonical isomorphism Hq(Z,F)  ≅  Hq(X,i∗F), where Hq denotes sheaf cohomology (Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections).

If in addition X is locally Noetherian (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes) and F is coherent (Coherent module sheaves), then i∗F is a coherent OX-module. The empty scheme, the zero module and the case X=Spec⁡A affine are included.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a closed immersion i:Z→X and a quasi-coherent OZ-module F.

[F1]

A closed immersion is affine: for every affine open U=Spec⁡A⊆X there is an ideal I⊆A with i−1(U)≅Spec⁡(A/I), in particular i−1(U) is affine. (Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change, Affine morphisms, Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum)

[F2]

Affine morphisms and cohomology: if f:Y→T is affine, then the map Hq(T,f∗G)→Hq(Y,G) is an isomorphism for every q≥0 and every quasi-coherent OY-module G (Affine pushforward is compatible with sheaf cohomology).

[F3]

Affine equivalence: for an affine scheme Spec⁡R the quasi-coherent modules are, up to canonical isomorphism, exactly the associated sheaves M~ of R-modules M (Affine quasi-coherent sheaves are modules, Module sheaf on an affine scheme); a quasi-coherent module is of finite type if and only if some/every presenting module is finitely generated (Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves); for F≅M~ one has Γ(D(f),F)≅Mf with restrictions the localisation maps (Sections of the associated sheaf on basic opens). On a locally Noetherian scheme coherence is local on the scheme, and a finite-type quasi-coherent module whose presenting modules are finitely generated over Noetherian rings is coherent (Coherent module sheaves, Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes).

Proof

technique · direct: a closed immersion is affine, apply the affine edge-map isomorphism for cohomology, and identify the pushforward on affine charts with a finitely generated module over a Noetherian ring to get coherence
1.1F1

The closed immersion i is an affine morphism: by [F1] the inverse image of every affine open subscheme of X is affine.

1.2F21.1

Apply [F2] to f=i:Z→X and G=F: the edge map Hq(X,i∗F)→Hq(Z,F) is an isomorphism for every q≥0, which is the asserted canonical isomorphism (in degree 0 it is the identity of Γ(Z,F) under the canonical identification of Γ(X,i∗F) with Γ(Z,F)).

1.3F1F3

Now assume X locally Noetherian and F coherent. Coherence of i∗F is local on X, so fix an affine open U=Spec⁡A⊆X; then A is Noetherian, and by [F1] there is an ideal I⊆A with i−1(U)=Spec⁡B, B=A/I. By [F3] the coherent module F∣i−1(U) is the associated sheaf M~ of a finitely generated B-module M=Γ(i−1(U),F), and B, being a quotient of the Noetherian ring A, is Noetherian.

1.4F1F3

The restriction (i∗F)∣U is the associated sheaf M~ of M viewed as an A-module through A↠B: indeed for f∈A with image fˉ∈B one has Γ(D(f),(i∗F)∣U)=F(i−1D(f))=Γ(D(fˉ),M~)=Mfˉ by [F1] and [F3], and these isomorphisms are compatible with the restriction maps, which on both sides are the canonical localisations; sheaves are determined by their sections on the basis of principal opens.

1.5F31.31.4

The A-module M is finitely generated, because it is finitely generated over the quotient ring B by 1.3; hence M~ is a coherent OU-module by [F3], since A is Noetherian. As U was an arbitrary affine open of the locally Noetherian scheme X, coherence of i∗F follows.

2.1F2F31.31.4∎

Boundary and choice accounting. If Z=∅ then F=0, i∗F=0 and both sides of the isomorphism are the zero group in every degree; if X=∅ then also Z=∅; if F=0 the isomorphism is 0≅0. Affine X is the case in which the local verification of 1.3-1.5 is already global. The Axiom of Choice is a hypothesis, consumed through the affine edge-map theorem [F2] and the affine equivalence [F3]; the localisation identifications of 1.4 make no further choice.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

79 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources