How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Affine pushforward is compatible with sheaf cohomology
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and Dependent Choice, inherited from the derived functors and the Godement resolution. Let be an affine morphism of schemes (Affine morphisms) and let be a quasi-coherent -module (Quasi-coherent module on a scheme). Then the natural maps of sheaf cohomology (Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections) are isomorphisms for every ; the pushforward is the direct image sheaf (Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map). The empty source, empty target, zero module and identity morphism are included, and is the identity under the definition of the direct image.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An affine morphism and a quasi-coherent -module .
Godement resolution: every abelian sheaf on a space has a resolution by flasque sheaves, and there are natural isomorphisms for all ; the Axiom of Choice is used in its construction. (Godement terms are flasque and compute cohomology)
Flasque means that every restriction map on open subsets is surjective; restrictions of flasque sheaves to open subspaces are flasque. (Flasque sheaf)
The direct image is defined on open by with the restriction maps of . (Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map)
Flasque sheaves are acyclic for global sections on every open subspace: for and open. (Flasque abelian sheaves are Γ-acyclic)
Local-section formula: is the sheafification of over open ; equivalently its stalks are the corresponding filtered colimits over the affine opens of . (Local-section formula for derived direct image, Higher direct image of a sheaf)
affine means that is affine for every affine open . (Affine morphisms)
Acyclic-resolution theorem: if is a resolution of an object by -acyclic objects for an additive left exact functor , then canonically, under the stated supplied-injective-data hypotheses, which hold for the module categories of schemes and their direct-image functors. Dependent Choice is assumed. (The acyclic-resolution theorem for right derived functors)
Affine vanishing: for affine and quasi-coherent one has for every . (Higher direct images of quasi-coherent modules vanish along affine morphisms)
The category of -modules is abelian; its kernels and cokernels have the same underlying abelian sheaves as the corresponding kernels and cokernels in the abelian-sheaf category. (Enough injective sheaves of modules)
Proof
Apply the Godement construction of [F1] to the underlying abelian sheaf of , retaining its module structure at every stage. Explicitly, for an -module , the first Godement term has , with acting in the -coordinate through . The germ map is -linear; take its cokernel in and repeat. By [F9] the resulting kernels and cokernels have the same underlying abelian sheaves as in the abelian-sheaf construction, so this gives an exact resolution by -modules whose underlying abelian complex is the Godement resolution. Every is flasque and naturally in by [F1].
For every the sheaf is flasque: by [F3] its sections on an open are those of on , and for the restriction map of is the restriction map of along the open inclusion , which is surjective by [F2].
Every flasque sheaf on is -acyclic, that is for all . Indeed, let be affine; then is affine by [F6] and for by [F4]. The local-section formula [F5] exhibits as the sheafification of the presheaf , and as in the proof of [F8] its stalks are filtered colimits over the affine opens of , all of whose values vanish; hence these stalks are zero and .
Apply the acyclic-resolution theorem [F7] to the left exact functor and the resolution of , all of whose terms are -acyclic by step 1.3: there are canonical isomorphisms for every . Since is affine and quasi-coherent, [F8] gives for ; therefore the complex is a resolution of by flasque sheaves, the degree-zero cohomology being by left exactness of .
Apply [F7] to the global-sections functor and the resolution of from step 2.1, whose terms are flasque, hence -acyclic by [F4]: there are canonical isomorphisms for every . Since by [F3], the right-hand cohomology is , which is through the natural isomorphism of step 1.1. Composing gives an isomorphism for every .
Naturality and canonical identification. The Godement construction in step 1.1 is functorial in , and the acyclic-resolution comparison isomorphisms in steps 2.1 and 3.1 are natural by [F7]. Their composite is therefore the canonical map obtained by evaluating the same complex first as and then as under the identity of functors ; in degree zero it is the identity on . Boundary cases: if or then and both sides vanish; if both sides are zero sheaves on the empty space; if is the identity then the comparison is the identity map. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from [F1] and [F4], and Dependent Choice from [F7]; no other selection is made.
Depends on
- Affine morphisms
- Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map
- Flasque sheaf
- Godement terms are flasque and compute cohomology
- Enough injective sheaves of modules
- Flasque abelian sheaves are Γ-acyclic
- The acyclic-resolution theorem for right derived functors
- Local-section formula for derived direct image
- Higher direct image of a sheaf
- Higher direct images of quasi-coherent modules vanish along affine morphisms
- Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections
- Quasi-coherent module on a scheme
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
76 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Schemes, Chapter 30, Sections 30.2-30.22 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea (29 August 2022), Sections 19.1, 19.6, 19.9, 28.1-28.2 (standard reference, not scraped)