How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Higher direct image of a sheaf
Definition
Let be a morphism of ringed spaces and let be an -module (Modules on a ringed space). The direct image presheaf is defined on opens by (Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map); when is a sheaf of modules, this presheaf is again a sheaf of modules on (Direct image preserves sheaves and objectwise algebraic structure), and for a morphism of ringed spaces it is an -module, because is right adjoint to the inverse image functor on modules (Pullback of modules is left adjoint to pushforward); a right adjoint is left exact and additive (A right adjoint is left exact and a left adjoint is right exact).
Fix the supplied functorial injective resolution datum on of Enough injective sheaves of modules: it assigns to every -module one specific injective resolution (Injective resolutions in an abelian category) with deleted complex (Right derived objects relative to supplied injective resolution data). For every define the -th higher direct image sheaf
the -th right derived object of the additive left exact functor relative to the fixed datum (Right derived objects relative to supplied injective resolution data), the cohomology object being taken in the abelian category of -modules. We also keep the convention for .
By the derived-object convention this makes a specific -module for every and , depending on the fixed datum ; in degree zero the left exactness of supplies a canonical natural isomorphism (The zero-th right derived functor of a left exact functor recovers the functor, which assumes the Axiom of Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain)), so the term is the ordinary direct image. The Axiom of Choice supplies the functorial injective resolution datum of (The Axiom of Choice) and implies the Dependent Choice required by the cited degree-zero and comparison theorems (AC implies DC implies countable choice). If is any other supplied injective resolution datum on , then the functors and are naturally isomorphic (Two supplied injective resolution data define naturally isomorphic right derived functors), so the higher direct image is independent of the resolution up to a canonical comparison isomorphism.
Depends on
- Modules on a ringed space
- Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map
- Direct image preserves sheaves and objectwise algebraic structure
- Pullback of modules is left adjoint to pushforward
- A right adjoint is left exact and a left adjoint is right exact
- Enough injective sheaves of modules
- Right derived objects relative to supplied injective resolution data
- The zero-th right derived functor of a left exact functor recovers the functor
- Two supplied injective resolution data define naturally isomorphic right derived functors
- The Axiom of Choice
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- AC implies DC implies countable choice
Used by
- Upper semicontinuity of fibre cohomology dimensions Corollary
- Cohomology and base-change map Definition
- Affine pushforward is compatible with sheaf cohomology Lemma
- Finite projective complex for proper flat coherent cohomology Lemma
- Higher direct images localize over an affine base Lemma
- Local-section formula for derived direct image Lemma
- Relative projective-line cohomology and apolarity Lemma
- Coherent higher direct images under proper morphisms Theorem
- Cohomology and base change for proper flat coherent families Theorem
- Finite coherent cohomology for proper schemes Theorem
- Higher direct images of quasi-coherent modules vanish along affine morphisms Theorem
- Leray spectral sequence for sheaf cohomology Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Schemes, Chapter 30, §§30.2–30.22 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea (29 August 2022), §§19.1, 19.6, 19.9, 28.1–28.2 (standard reference, not scraped)