Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Higher direct image of a sheaf

Definition

Let (f,f♯):(X,OX)→(Y,OY) be a morphism of ringed spaces and let F be an OX-module (Modules on a ringed space). The direct image presheaf f∗F is defined on opens V⊆Y by (f∗F)(V)=F(f−1(V)) (Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map); when F is a sheaf of modules, this presheaf is again a sheaf of modules on Y (Direct image preserves sheaves and objectwise algebraic structure), and for a morphism of ringed spaces it is an OY-module, because f∗ is right adjoint to the inverse image functor f∗ on modules (Pullback of modules is left adjoint to pushforward); a right adjoint is left exact and additive (A right adjoint is left exact and a left adjoint is right exact).

Fix the supplied functorial injective resolution datum I on Mod(OX) of Enough injective sheaves of modules: it assigns to every OX-module F one specific injective resolution 0→F→I0(F)→I1(F)→⋯ (Injective resolutions in an abelian category) with deleted complex I(F)del (Right derived objects relative to supplied injective resolution data). For every q∈Z define the q-th higher direct image sheaf

Rqf∗F:=RIqf∗(F)=Hq(f∗I(F)del),

the q-th right derived object of the additive left exact functor f∗:Mod(OX)→Mod(OY) relative to the fixed datum I (Right derived objects relative to supplied injective resolution data), the cohomology object being taken in the abelian category of OY-modules. We also keep the convention Rqf∗F=0 for q<0.

By the derived-object convention this makes Rqf∗F a specific OY-module for every F and q, depending on the fixed datum I; in degree zero the left exactness of f∗ supplies a canonical natural isomorphism R0f∗F→∼f∗F (The zero-th right derived functor of a left exact functor recovers the functor, which assumes the Axiom of Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain)), so the q=0 term is the ordinary direct image. The Axiom of Choice supplies the functorial injective resolution datum of Mod(OX) (The Axiom of Choice) and implies the Dependent Choice required by the cited degree-zero and comparison theorems (AC implies DC implies countable choice). If J is any other supplied injective resolution datum on Mod(OX), then the functors RIqf∗ and RJqf∗ are naturally isomorphic (Two supplied injective resolution data define naturally isomorphic right derived functors), so the higher direct image is independent of the resolution up to a canonical comparison isomorphism.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources