How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Higher direct images of quasi-coherent modules vanish along affine morphisms
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from sheaf cohomology and from the derived direct-image construction. Let be an affine morphism of schemes (Affine morphisms) and let be a quasi-coherent -module (Quasi-coherent module on a scheme). Then, with the higher direct images (Higher direct image of a sheaf), for every . The empty source and target, the zero module, the identity morphism and the case where is affine are included; is not asserted to vanish, since need not be zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An affine morphism of schemes and a quasi-coherent -module .
is affine when is an affine scheme with the restricted structure sheaf for every affine open subscheme ; this includes the empty preimages. (Affine morphisms)
If is affine and is a quasi-coherent -module, then for every , including the empty affine scheme and the zero module. (Affine acyclicity of quasi-coherent sheaves)
The restriction of a quasi-coherent module to an open subscheme is quasi-coherent. (Quasi-coherent module on a scheme)
Local-section formula: for every the sheaf is the sheafification of the presheaf on the open subsets . (Local-section formula for derived direct image, Higher direct image of a sheaf)
Sheafification preserves stalks: for a presheaf on and the map is a bijection. (Sheafification preserves stalks)
The stalk of a presheaf at is the filtered colimit of its values over the open neighbourhoods of ; comparing along a cofinal subsystem gives the same colimit. Every point of a scheme has an affine open neighbourhood, and the affine open subschemes of form a basis of its topology. (The stalk of a presheaf at a point, Schemes)
A morphism of sheaves on a space is an isomorphism if and only if it is an isomorphism on every stalk; in particular a sheaf whose stalks are all zero is the zero sheaf. (A morphism of sheaves is an isomorphism exactly when it is an isomorphism on every stalk)
Proof
Let be affine. By [F1] the preimage is an affine scheme, and is quasi-coherent by [F3]. Applying [F2] to the affine scheme and this restriction gives for every .
Fix and let be the presheaf on the open subsets of . By [F4] the sheaf is 's sheafification, so by [F5] its stalk at a point is the stalk of at .
Compute that stalk as a colimit. By [F6] the stalk of at is the filtered colimit of the groups over the open neighbourhoods , and by the same fact the affine open neighbourhoods of — which form a basis — are cofinal in this system, so the colimit may be computed over them alone. Every value occurring there vanishes by step 1.1, and a filtered colimit of zero groups with zero transition maps is zero, so for every .
The sheaf has zero stalk at every point of by step 2.1, so by [F7] it is the zero sheaf; this holds for every , which is the assertion. Boundary cases: if there is nothing to check and the claim is vacuous; if or , step 1.1 applies at every affine with value ; if is the identity or is affine, step 1.1 is the same computation. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from [F2] and [F4], and no further selection is made beyond the choice of the pointwise affine neighbourhoods implicit in [F6].
Depends on
- Affine morphisms
- Quasi-coherent module on a scheme
- Affine acyclicity of quasi-coherent sheaves
- Local-section formula for derived direct image
- Higher direct image of a sheaf
- Sheafification preserves stalks
- The stalk of a presheaf at a point
- A morphism of sheaves is an isomorphism exactly when it is an isomorphism on every stalk
- Schemes
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Schemes, Chapter 30, Sections 30.2-30.22 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea (29 August 2022), Sections 19.1, 19.6, 19.9, 28.1-28.2 (standard reference, not scraped)