Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited through the quasi-coherent interfaces (The Axiom of Choice). Let X be a locally Noetherian scheme (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes). Then:

  1. A quasi-coherent OX-module is coherent (Coherent module sheaves) if and only if it is of finite type (Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves).
  2. For every morphism φ:F→G of coherent OX-modules the kernel, image and cokernel of φ are coherent, and finite direct sums of coherent modules are coherent.
  3. Extensions: if 0→F→E→G→0 is a short exact sequence of quasi-coherent OX-modules (Exact sequences of sheaves) with F and G coherent, then E is coherent. Thus Coh⁡(X) is closed under extensions inside QCoh⁡(X).

The equivalence in (1) is the theorem's essential content: the relation kernel condition in the definition of coherence is automatic for finite type quasi-coherent modules over a locally Noetherian base, but not over an arbitrary base.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A locally Noetherian scheme X; for the coherence test in claim (1) an open U⊆X, an integer n≥0 and a morphism τ:OUn→F∣U; for claim (2) a morphism φ:F→G of coherent OX-modules; for claim (3) a short exact sequence 0→F→E→G→0 of quasi-coherent OX-modules with F,G coherent.

[F1]

Coherence (Coherent module sheaves): a quasi-coherent F of finite type is coherent when for every open U⊆X and every morphism τ:OUn→F∣U, n≥0 finite, the kernel sheaf ker⁡τ is of finite type; it suffices to test affine U=Spec⁡A with F∣U≅M~ and M finitely generated, in which case τ is induced by an A-linear map ψ:An→M and ker⁡τ=(ker⁡ψ)~. Coherence is local on X and invariant under isomorphism, a coherent module is of finite type by definition, and the zero module is coherent.

[F2]

Finite type (Finite type and finitely presented module sheaves): the condition is local on X and invariant under isomorphism; equivalently X is covered by affine opens U admitting finitely many sections generating F∣U; restrictions to open subschemes are of finite type; the zero module and the free modules OXn are of finite type; and on an affine U=Spec⁡A with F∣U≅M~ the module M is finitely generated exactly when F∣U admits a finite generating family of sections.

[F3]

Localisation and restriction (Localisation of modules is exact, Sections of the associated sheaf on basic opens, Module sheaf on an affine scheme, A localised module fraction is zero exactly when one denominator kills its numerator, Localisation of a module at a multiplicative subset, Restriction of a sheaf to an open subspace): localisation of modules is exact, so for an A-linear ψ:M→N one has ker⁡ψ~=(ker⁡ψ)~, im⁡ψ~=(im⁡ψ)~ and coker⁡ψ~=(coker⁡ψ)~; M~(D(f))=Mf with restriction the canonical localisation; an element of Mf is zero exactly when some power of f kills a numerator (so if (N/N′)gi=0 for elements g1,…,gk generating the unit ideal, then N/N′=0); and restriction of sheaves to an open subscheme is exact, so a short exact sequence restricts to a short exact sequence. Kernel sheaves are computed objectwise, so (ker⁡τ)∣V=ker⁡(τ∣V) (Kernel sheaves are objectwise, while cokernels and images are sheafified).

[F4]

Noetherian module facts (Over a Noetherian ring a module is Noetherian exactly when it is finitely generated, exactly when it is finitely presented, Finite modules over Noetherian rings are Noetherian, Noetherian modules: every submodule is finitely generated, Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module): over a Noetherian commutative ring a finitely generated module is Noetherian and finitely presented; a Noetherian module has every submodule finitely generated; a quotient of a finitely generated module is finitely generated, generated by the images of any generating family; and in a short exact sequence of modules whose outer terms are finitely generated the middle term is finitely generated, since lifts of finitely many generators of the quotient together with generators of the submodule generate the middle term.

[F5]

Localisations of Noetherian rings are Noetherian (Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian).

[F6]

Locally Noetherian (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes): X has an affine open cover by spectra of Noetherian rings.

[F7]

Distinguished opens and quasi-compactness (The underlying space of an affine spectrum, A principal localization identifies its spectrum with a distinguished open, Every affine scheme is quasi-compact): the distinguished opens D(f) form a basis of Spec⁡A, D(f)=Spec⁡Af, and Spec⁡A is quasi-compact, so every open cover of it has a finite subcover.

[F8]

Quasi-coherent kernels, cokernels and biproducts (Kernels and cokernels of quasi-coherent modules, Quasi-coherent module on a scheme): kernels, images and cokernels of morphisms of quasi-coherent modules are quasi-coherent, QCoh⁡(X) is an abelian subcategory of Mod⁡(OX) closed under finite biproducts, and the restriction of a quasi-coherent module to an open subscheme is quasi-coherent.

[F9]

Affine equivalence (Affine quasi-coherent sheaves are modules): for an affine scheme V=Spec⁡B the functors M↦M~ and Γ(V,−) are quasi-inverse equivalences between B-modules and quasi-coherent OV-modules; hence (−)~ is exact and full, the comparison κH:Γ(V,H)~→H is an isomorphism for quasi-coherent H, and morphisms of quasi-coherent OV-modules correspond bijectively to B-linear maps of their modules of global sections.

[F10]

Restriction of associated sheaves to affine opens (An associated sheaf restricts to an associated sheaf on an affine open): for a commutative ring A, an A-module M and an affine open subscheme W=Spec⁡C⊆Spec⁡A there is a canonical isomorphism (M~)∣W≅(C⊗AM)~, natural in M.

[F11]

The Axiom of Choice as inherited from the associated-sheaf existence theorem, the affine equivalence and the gluing machinery (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof technique: direct; pass to Noetherian affine charts and use that finitely generated modules over a Noetherian ring have finitely generated submodules, then glue the local conclusions.

Proof

1.1F5F6F7

Noetherian affine charts inside any open: let x∈X and let U⊆X be an open neighbourhood of x. By [F6] there is an affine open W=Spec⁡A∋x with A Noetherian; the set W∩U is an open neighbourhood of x in W, so by the basis property of distinguished opens [F7] there is f∈A with x∈D(f)⊆W∩U. Then D(f)=Spec⁡Af⊆U is affine and Af is Noetherian by [F5].

1.2F2F3F7F9F10

Finite type is detected on every affine chart: let V=Spec⁡B⊆X be affine and let F be of finite type. Since F is quasi-coherent, [F9] gives F∣V≅N~ with N=Γ(V,F∣V). For x∈V choose by [F2] an affine open Ux⊆X with F∣Ux≅Mx~ and Mx finitely generated, and by [F7] choose gx∈B with x∈DV(gx)⊆Ux∩V; then DV(gx) is an affine open subscheme of Ux with coordinate ring Bgx, so [F10] gives F∣DV(gx)≅(Bgx⊗O(Ux)Mx)~ with a finitely generated module, while (N~)∣DV(gx)≅(Ngx)~ by [F3]; hence Ngx is finitely generated over Bgx. Since V=DV(g1)∪⋯∪DV(gk) for finitely many gi∈B with (g1,…,gk)=B by quasi-compactness [F7], and each Ngi is finitely generated, choose finitely many elements of N whose images generate each Ngi and let N′⊆N be the submodule they generate; then (N/N′)gi=0 for all i, so N/N′=0 by the localisation criterion of [F3], and N=N′ is finitely generated.

1.3F1

Claim 1, forward direction: by definition a coherent module is quasi-coherent of finite type, so coherent implies finite type.

2.1F1F2F3F4F9step 1.1step 1.2

Claim 1, converse: let F be quasi-coherent of finite type, let U⊆X be open, n≥0 and τ:OUn→F∣U; we show that ker⁡τ is of finite type. By step 1.1 the open U is covered by affine charts V=Spec⁡B⊆U with B Noetherian; on such a chart F∣V=N~ with N finitely generated by step 1.2, and τ∣V is induced by a B-linear map ψ:Bn→N with ker⁡(τ∣V)=(ker⁡ψ)~ [F1, F9]. As B is Noetherian, the finite free module Bn is Noetherian, so its submodule ker⁡ψ is finitely generated [F4], so ker⁡(τ∣V) is of finite type [F3]. Kernel sheaves restrict to open subschemes and finite type is local on X [F3, F2], so ker⁡τ is of finite type over the cover of U by these charts; as this holds for every (U,n,τ), F is coherent [F1].

3.1F2F3F4F8F9step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1

Claim 2, kernels, images and cokernels: let φ:F→G be a morphism of coherent modules. By [F8] the sheaves ker⁡φ, im⁡φ and coker⁡φ are quasi-coherent. Cover X by Noetherian affine charts V=Spec⁡B (step 1.1); on each of them F∣V=M~ and G∣V=N~ with M,N finitely generated (step 1.2), and φ∣V=ψ~ for a unique B-linear map ψ:M→N [F9]; by exactness of (−)~ the sheaves ker⁡(φ∣V), im⁡(φ∣V) and coker⁡(φ∣V) are the associated sheaves of ker⁡ψ, im⁡ψ and coker⁡ψ [F3]. Since B is Noetherian and M finitely generated, ker⁡ψ is finitely generated, and im⁡ψ, coker⁡ψ are quotients of finitely generated modules, hence finitely generated [F4]; therefore the three sheaves are of finite type on the covering charts and hence of finite type [F2], and being quasi-coherent they are coherent by step 2.1.

3.2F2F3F4F8F9step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1

Claim 3, extensions: let 0→F→E→G→0 be exact with F,G coherent and E quasi-coherent. Cover X by Noetherian affine charts V=Spec⁡B (step 1.1); restriction to the open subscheme V is exact, so 0→M~→E∣V→N~→0 is exact with F∣V=M~, G∣V=N~ and M,N finitely generated (steps 1.2, [F3]). Since E∣V is quasi-coherent [F8] and V is affine, [F9] gives E∣V≅P~ with P=Γ(V,E∣V); the functor Γ(V,−) is an equivalence between quasi-coherent OV-modules and B-modules, hence exact, so applying it to 0→M~→P~→N~→0 yields the exact sequence 0→M→P→N→0 [F9]. With M and N finitely generated, P is finitely generated: lift finitely many generators of N to P and add generators of M [F4]. Therefore E∣V is of finite type on every chart of the cover, so E is of finite type [F2]; being quasi-coherent by hypothesis, E is coherent by step 2.1.

4.1F2F3F8F9step 3.1step 2.1

Claim 2, finite direct sums: for coherent F,G the biproduct F⊕G is quasi-coherent [F8], and on a Noetherian affine chart as in step 3.1 it is (M⊕N)~ with M⊕N finitely generated [F3, F9], hence is of finite type by locality [F2]; by step 2.1 it is coherent.

5.1F2F6F11step 1.1step 1.2∎

Choice accounting: the arguments use the family of all Noetherian affine charts, which is determined by the data, together with finite subcovers and finite generating sets extracted from the given modules and morphisms; no chart, generator family or isomorphism is selected by an infinite simultaneous choice, so the only Axiom of Choice is the inherited one recorded in [F11].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

84 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources