How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every affine scheme is quasi-compact
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Every affine scheme is quasi-compact.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) and an affine scheme .
Under the Axiom of Choice, every distinguished open of an affine spectrum is quasi-compact (Every distinguished open of an affine spectrum is quasi-compact).
Proof
Choose an isomorphism from affineness.
The whole spectrum is , which is quasi-compact by [F1] under the assumed Axiom of Choice. This is the only use of AC in this argument.
Its homeomorphic copy is quasi-compact.
Depends on
Used by
- Finite morphisms are proper Corollary
- Global generation does not imply very ampleness Counterexample
- Proper cohomology need not be finite for noncoherent sheaves Counterexample
- Quasi-separatedness in pushforward cannot be omitted Counterexample
- The Hopf algebra of a split torus and its root-of-unity subgroups Example
- A quasi-compact image stable under specialization is closed Lemma
- A quasi-compact immersion with nonclosed image has a boundary specialization Lemma
- Affineness is local on the target Lemma
- An affine scheme of finite type over a field has a finitely generated coordinate ring Lemma
- Closed gluing of two projective three-spaces is proper Lemma
- Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change Lemma
- Constructible subsets stable under generalisation are open in an affine spectrum Lemma
- Eventual generation of coherent projective twists Lemma
- Finite is affine and local on its target Lemma
- Finite projective complex for proper flat coherent cohomology Lemma
- Finite type is affine-local on source and target Lemma
- Flat field extension commutes with coherent cohomology Lemma
- Fpqc covers are universally submersive Lemma
- Fpqc descent of properness components Lemma
- Line bundles on projective three-space and their restrictions Lemma
- Projective space is of finite type over its base Lemma
- Properness survives composition Lemma
- Quasi-compactness is local on the target and survives base change Lemma
- Quasi-separatedness and the diagonal Lemma
- Structure sheaf of a quasi-compact quasi-separated morphism is affine-local Lemma
- The general linear group scheme and its coordinate ring Lemma
- The quotient by a maximal line subbundle is locally free Lemma
- Valuation lifts detect universal closedness Lemma
- Affine acyclicity of quasi-coherent sheaves Theorem
- Affine group schemes of finite type are antiequivalent to finitely generated commutative Hopf algebras Theorem
- Affine schemes are quasi-separated Theorem
- Closed immersions into affine schemes are quotient spectra Theorem
- Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme Theorem
- Finite and finite type etale schemes over an algebraically closed field Theorem
- Finite coherent cohomology for proper schemes Theorem
- Locally standard smooth iff flat with geometrically regular fibres Theorem
- Projective n-space has quasi-coherent cohomological dimension at most n Theorem
- Quasi-coherence of pushforward for qcqs morphisms Theorem
- Serre duality for coherent sheaves on projective space Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 26.5.1 (standard reference, not scraped)