Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Affineness is local on the target

Statement

A morphism f:XS is affine if and only if there exists an affine open cover S=iUi for which every f1(Ui) is affine.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects, hypotheses and conventions in the statement above.

[F1]

A morphism of schemes f:XS is affine when f1(U) is affine for every affine open subscheme US. Here the inverse image carries the restricted structure sheaf, as in def-affine-open-subscheme, and f is a morphism of locally ringed spaces as in def-morphism-of-schemes. The empty scheme is affine, being Spec0. Affineness of a morphism does not require its total source or target to be affine. (Affine morphisms)

[F2]

Let X be a scheme, R=Γ(X,OX), and f1,,fnR. Write Xf for the open locus where the germ of f is a unit. If (f1,,fn)=R and each Ui=Xfi is affine, then X is affine. In fact the canonical morphism XSpecR is an isomorphism. Empty X and n=0 are allowed. (Affineness from a finite principal cover)

[F3]

For fA, the morphism induced by AAf identifies Spec(Af) with the open locally ringed subspace D(f) of SpecA. (A principal localization identifies its spectrum with a distinguished open)

[F4]

Every affine scheme is quasi-compact. (Every affine scheme is quasi-compact)

[F5]

Assume the Axiom of Choice (def-axiom-of-choice). In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal. (In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal)

Proof

1.1

If f is affine, F1 gives the condition on any affine cover. Conversely suppose such a cover is given and let V=SpecAS be arbitrary affine open. For vVUi, choose a principal open DUi(a) containing v and contained in V. Choose a principal open DV(h) containing v and contained in DUi(a). On the affine DUi(a) the restriction of h is b/am, so DV(h) is also DUi(ab), a principal open of Ui.

givenF1F3
2.1

F4 gives finitely many such DV(hj) covering V. Their functions generate the unit ideal of A: if the ideal were proper F5 supplies a maximal, hence prime, ideal containing it would lie outside the cover, contrary to V=jD(hj). Each f1(DV(hj)) is principal in the affine f1(Ui(j)), so it is affine by F3.

F3F4step 1.1F5
3.1

The pullbacks of the hj are global sections of OX on f1(V) generating 1. F2 shows that f1(V) is affine. Since V was arbitrary, F1 proves f affine. Empty V, a singleton cover, nilpotents, and an empty source are included by F2 and the same formulas.

F1F2step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources