Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passverified 2026-08-06 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonzero commutative ring RR and a proper ideal IRI\mathrel{\trianglelefteq}R.

[L1]

A maximal ideal is a maximal proper ideal under inclusion (Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring).

[L2]

Ideals are additive subgroups with multiplication absorption (Left, right and two-sided ideals).

[L3]

An ideal criterion and intersection closure are available (Ideal criteria and intersections of ideals).

[L4]

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a nonempty poset in which every chain has an upper bound has a maximal element (Zorn's lemma).

[L5]

A chain is a subset linearly ordered by the ambient order (Chain in a poset).

[L6]

A maximal element has no strictly larger element in the poset (Maximal element and greatest element).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let P\mathcal P be the poset of proper ideals of RR containing II, ordered by inclusion.

L1L2givenconstruct
1.2

P\mathcal P is nonempty, because II is a proper ideal containing II.

givenL2
2.1

The empty chain of P\mathcal P has an upper bound in P\mathcal P: every member of P\mathcal P is vacuously above all of its members, and P\mathcal P is nonempty, so II is such an upper bound.

step 1.1step 1.2L5
2.2

A nonempty chain CP\mathcal C\subseteq\mathcal P has an upper bound in P\mathcal P: C\bigcup\mathcal C is an ideal containing II, and it is proper, since 1C1\in\bigcup\mathcal C would place 11 in some member of C\mathcal C, forcing that member to equal RR and contradicting its properness.

step 1.1L2L3L5L7algebra
3.1

Every chain of P\mathcal P has an upper bound in P\mathcal P, and P\mathcal P is a nonempty poset, so Zorn's lemma yields a maximal element MM of P\mathcal P.

step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2L4
4.1

MM is a proper ideal containing II that is maximal among proper ideals of RR, so MM is a maximal ideal containing II.

step 3.1L1L6

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 32 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources