How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite torsion-free modules over Dedekind domains are projective
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Every finite torsion-free module over a Dedekind domain is projective.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Dedekind domain and a finitely generated torsion-free -module .
Localising a Dedekind domain at a nonzero prime gives a DVR (Localizing a Dedekind domain at a nonzero prime gives a DVR).
Every finitely generated torsion-free module over a PID is free (Every finitely generated torsion-free module over a PID is free).
Localisation of modules is exact (Localisation of modules is exact).
A module is projective exactly when some free cover splits (Equivalent characterizations of projective modules).
Every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal (In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal).
Proof
Choose a surjection from a finite free module . For a maximal ideal , the localisation is a DVR by [L1], hence a PID, and is still finitely generated and torsion-free by [L3]. Therefore [L2] makes a free -module. Thus the localised surjection splits, and clearing the finitely many denominators in one local section yields and a global map such that .
Let . This is an ideal of , and step 1.1 shows that for every maximal ideal one has . Therefore is not contained in any maximal ideal. By [L5], cannot be proper, so . Choose with . Then splits, and [L4] makes projective.
Depends on
- The field of fractions $\operatorname{Frac}(D)=(D\setminus\{0\})^{-1}D$ of an integral domain
- Localizing a Dedekind domain at a nonzero prime gives a DVR
- Every finitely generated torsion-free module over a PID is free
- Localisation of modules is exact
- Equivalent characterizations of projective modules
- In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. P. May, Notes on Dedekind Rings (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, §20 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 15.22.11 (standard reference, not scraped)