Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A nonzero finite projective module over a Dedekind domain splits off a rank-one summand

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let R be a Dedekind domain and let M be a nonzero finite projective R-module. Then there exist a finite projective module N and an invertible fractional ideal I such that MNI.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Dedekind domain R, its fraction field K, and a nonzero finite projective R-module M.

[L1]

Every finite torsion-free module over a Dedekind domain is projective (Finite torsion-free modules over Dedekind domains are projective).

[L2]

Invertible fractional ideals are exactly the finite rank-one projective modules (Invertible fractional ideals are exactly the rank-one projective modules).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The K-vector space MK:=MRK is nonzero because M is a nonzero projective module over a domain. Choose a nonzero K-linear functional λ:MKK. Its image on the finite module M is a finitely generated nonzero R-submodule I:=λ(M)K, so I is a fractional ideal. As a submodule of the field K, the module I is torsion-free; since it is finitely generated, [L1] makes it projective. Because λK:MKK is surjective, one has IRK=K, so I has rank one. Therefore [L2] makes I an invertible fractional ideal.

L1L2givenchoosealgebra
2.1

The restricted map MI is surjective by construction. Since I is projective by step 1.1, this surjection splits. Therefore Mker(λM)I. Put N:=ker(λM). Then N is finite projective as a direct summand of M.

L1step 1.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources