How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A distinguished-open cover of the spectrum forces the covering ideal to be the unit ideal
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
Let be a commutative ring and let be a family of elements of such that Then the ideal generated by the family is the unit ideal .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , a family in , and the Axiom of Choice.
In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal (In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal).
Proof
Let be the ideal generated by . If , then is a proper ideal, so is nonzero and [L1] gives a maximal ideal containing .
For every , one has , so . Hence , contradicting the assumed cover of .
The contradiction shows that cannot be proper. Therefore .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Proposition (13.20) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 10.17.2 (standard reference, not scraped)