How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The prime spectrum is compact in the library's non-Hausdorff sense
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
For every commutative ring , the topological space is compact.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , an open cover of , and the Axiom of Choice.
A topological space is compact when every open cover has a finite subcover (Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right).
Every point of a Zariski-open set has a distinguished-open neighbourhood inside it (Every point of a Zariski-open set has a distinguished-open neighbourhood inside it).
A distinguished-open cover of the spectrum forces the covering ideal to be the unit ideal (A distinguished-open cover of the spectrum forces the covering ideal to be the unit ideal).
A finite unit expression yields the finite cover (A finite unit-ideal expression yields a finite distinguished-open subcover).
Proof
If , then the empty subfamily of already covers it. By [L1], the spectrum is compact in this case.
Assume now that . For each , choose with . By [L2], choose with . Then is a distinguished-open cover of the spectrum.
By [L3], the ideal generated by the family is . Hence there exist finitely many primes and coefficients such that .
Applying [L4] to this identity gives . Thus has a finite subcover.
Steps 1.1 and 3.1 show that every open cover of has a finite subcover. Therefore is compact by [L1].
Depends on
- Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right
- Every point of a Zariski-open set has a distinguished-open neighbourhood inside it
- A distinguished-open cover of the spectrum forces the covering ideal to be the unit ideal
- A finite unit-ideal expression yields a finite distinguished-open subcover
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Proposition (13.20) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, Proposition 14.4(c) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 10.17.8 (standard reference, not scraped)