How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A finite unit-ideal expression yields a finite distinguished-open subcover
Statement
Let be a commutative ring. If for elements , then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring and an identity in .
is the set of prime ideals that do not contain (Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum).
Proof
Let . If were outside , then [L1] would give for every . Because is an ideal, it would then contain the sum , impossible for a prime ideal.
Therefore every prime ideal lies in at least one , so .
The displayed unit expression yields a finite distinguished-open subcover of the spectrum.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Proposition (13.20) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, Proposition 14.4(c) (standard reference, not scraped)