How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Distinguished-subset identities
Statement
Let be a commutative ring and let . Then
Moreover, for every integer one has
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , elements , and an integer .
is the set of prime ideals that do not contain (Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum).
Proof
Every prime ideal contains , so no prime lies in . Every prime ideal is proper, so it does not contain ; hence every prime lies in . Therefore and .
Let . Then exactly when . Because is prime, this is equivalent to saying that neither nor lies in , that is, . The same prime-ideal property shows that exactly when , so .
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove the stated identities for principal distinguished subsets.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, §14 The spectrum of a ring (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., §13 The Spectrum of a Ring (standard reference, not scraped)