How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The nilradical is the intersection of all prime ideals
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
For a commutative ring , , with the empty-intersection convention in force for the zero ring.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring and the Axiom of Choice.
The nilradical of is (The nilradical and reduced rings).
The radical of any ideal is the intersection of the prime ideals containing it (The radical of an ideal is the intersection of the prime ideals containing it).
Proof
By [L1], .
Applying [L2] to the zero ideal gives . Combining this with step 1.1 yields the claimed formula for the nilradical.
Therefore the nilradical is exactly the intersection of all prime ideals of .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, §2 Ideals (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., §2 Ideals (standard reference, not scraped)