How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A clopen decomposition of the spectrum comes from a nontrivial idempotent
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
Let be a commutative ring and let be clopen. Then there exists an idempotent such that If is nonempty and proper, then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , a clopen subset , and the Axiom of Choice.
Every Zariski-closed subset has a unique radical defining ideal (Every Zariski-closed subset has a unique radical defining ideal).
The nilradical is the intersection of all prime ideals (The nilradical is the intersection of all prime ideals).
For comaximal ideals , the canonical map is an isomorphism and (Chinese remainder theorem for pairwise comaximal ideals).
In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal (In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal).
For ideals , the Zariski identities are and .
Proof
By [L1], there are radical ideals such that and . Since and its complement are disjoint and cover the spectrum, [A1] gives and . If were proper, then either would be the zero ring, in which case anyway, or [L4] would place inside a maximal ideal, hence inside a prime ideal, contradicting . Therefore , and [L3] gives .
Every element of therefore lies in every prime ideal of . By [L2], .
Choose and with . Then by step 2.1, so for some . Expanding shows that every term is divisible by or by , so there exist with . Put . Then , , and , so .
If , then , while because otherwise . Thus . Conversely, if , then . Since and is prime, one also has , so . Hence . Therefore .
The same argument with in place of gives . If is nonempty and proper, then neither nor is empty, so and .
Thus every clopen subset of the spectrum comes from an idempotent, and a nonempty proper clopen subset comes from a nontrivial idempotent.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, Lemma 14.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Section 10.22: Connected components of spectra (standard reference, not scraped)