Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Localization sections are independent of a distinguished-open presentation

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. The assignment D(f)Af, with the localization restrictions, is independent of the representation of a distinguished open and is a sheaf on the distinguished-open basis.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a ring A, and an arbitrary cover D(f)=iID(gi) by distinguished opens contained in D(f).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If D(g)D(f), localization universality gives the canonical restriction AfAg; for equal opens the two restrictions are inverse.

given
2.1

Under D(f)Spec(Af), the cover becomes the distinguished cover by the images of the gi. The spectrum-cover lemma makes those images generate the unit ideal in Af, so a finite subfamily already generates 1. The standard localization calculation for a finite unit-ideal cover then glues every compatible family in the (Af)giAgi uniquely to an element of Af.

step 1.1algebra
2.2

This includes the empty case: if D(f)=, then f lies in every prime ideal, so it is nilpotent; hence Af is the zero ring, and the empty compatible family glues uniquely to its sole element.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Thus gluing and uniqueness hold for every cover of a distinguished open by distinguished opens, not only for finite covers. This is precisely the sheaf axiom for the localization presheaf on the distinguished-open basis, so steps 2.1 and 2.2 prove the claim.

step 2.1step 2.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources