How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Closed immersions into affine schemes are quotient spectra
Statement
For a ring , closed immersions are, up to unique isomorphism over , precisely the morphisms for ideals .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A closed immersion .
Proof
By Stacks Project, Tag 01IN, there is an ideal whose associated quasi-coherent sheaf is the kernel of , and for every distinguished open one has In particular, for this gives over . This avoids the false inference that an arbitrary surjection of sheaves must be surjective on global sections.
Conversely, a quotient induces a morphism with closed image ; on every distinguished open it is the quotient , so the structure-sheaf map is surjective. Thus it is a closed immersion.
The kernel ideal and quotient construction recover each other, giving the claimed classification up to unique isomorphism.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 26.10.1 (standard reference, not scraped)