How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The spectrum of a principal localisation is the distinguished open D(f)
Statement
Let be a commutative ring and let . The localisation map induces a homeomorphism from onto the distinguished open subset
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring and an element .
For a localization at a multiplicative set , the spectrum identifies homeomorphically with the primes of disjoint from (The spectrum of a localisation is the subspace of primes disjoint from the denominator set).
is the set of prime ideals of that do not contain (Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum).
Proof
Apply [L1] with . Its image consists of the prime ideals such that .
For a prime ideal , the condition is equivalent to , because implies for every , while implies by primality. By [L2], this image is exactly .
Therefore is homeomorphic to the distinguished open subset .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, §14 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 10.17.6 (standard reference, not scraped)