Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, an element lies in the Jacobson radical exactly when one minus any multiple is a unit

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice.

For a commutative ring R and an element x∈R, x∈J(R)⟺1−rx is a unit for every r∈R.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring R and an element x∈R.

[L1]

The Jacobson radical is the intersection of the maximal ideals, with J(0)=0 (The Jacobson radical of a ring).

[L2]

In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal (In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal).

[L3]

A maximal ideal is a maximal proper ideal under inclusion (Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1given

If R=0, then J(R)=0 by [L1], the only element is x=0, and 1−rx=0 is the identity element of the zero ring, hence a unit. So the statement holds in this case.

1.2L1L3algebra

Assume R≠0 and first suppose x∈J(R). Fix r∈R. If 1−rx lay in a maximal ideal m, then [L1] gives x∈m, hence also rx∈m, so 1=(1−rx)+rx∈m, impossible. Thus 1−rx lies in no maximal ideal.

1.3L1L3algebra

Conversely, suppose 1−rx is a unit for every r∈R and that x∉J(R). By [L1], choose a maximal ideal m with x∉m. Then the ideal m+(x) strictly contains m, so maximality from [L3] gives m+(x)=R. Thus 1=a+rx for some a∈m and r∈R, so 1−rx=a∈m. But an element of a proper ideal cannot be a unit, contradicting the hypothesis. Therefore x∈J(R).

2.1step 1.2L2

Still under the hypothesis of step 1.2, if 1−rx were not a unit, then the principal ideal it generates would be proper, so [L2] would place it in a maximal ideal, contradicting step 1.2. Hence 1−rx is a unit for every r.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 1.3∎

Steps 1.1, 2.1, and 1.3 prove the equivalence.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources