How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a nonzero commutative ring is local exactly when its nonunits form an ideal, exactly when one of and is a unit for every
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For a nonzero commutative ring , the following are equivalent:
- is local;
- the set of nonunits of is an ideal;
- for every , at least one of and is a unit.
When these conditions hold, the ideal of nonunits is the unique maximal ideal.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonzero commutative ring and the Axiom of Choice.
A local ring is a nonzero commutative ring with one maximal ideal (A local ring is a nonzero commutative ring with a unique maximal ideal).
Assuming Choice, every proper ideal in a nonzero commutative ring lies in a maximal ideal (In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal).
Units contain and are closed under products and inverses; is not a unit in a nonzero ring (The units of a ring are the invertible elements of its multiplicative monoid, and is a group under multiplication; only in the zero ring).
An ideal contains , is closed under addition and additive inverses, and absorbs multiplication by ring elements (Left, right and two-sided ideals).
Proof
Assume is local with maximal ideal . No element of is a unit. Conversely, if is a nonunit, then is proper and [F2] places it in a maximal ideal, necessarily . Thus the nonunits are exactly , proving condition 2.
Assume the nonunits form an ideal . If both and were nonunits, then [F4] would give , contrary to [F3]. Hence condition 3 holds.
Assume condition 3 and let be the nonunits. By [F3], . If and , then cannot be a unit, since an inverse for would make a unit; also cannot be a unit.
If and were a unit, then and would both be nonunits, because a unit among either would make or a unit. This contradicts condition 3. Thus , and [F4] with step 1.3 shows that is an ideal.
The ideal is proper because . Every proper ideal consists entirely of nonunits, so it is contained in . Hence is maximal and is the only maximal ideal; by [F1], is local.
Depends on
- A local ring is a nonzero commutative ring with a unique maximal ideal
- In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal
- The units of a ring are the invertible elements of its multiplicative monoid, and $R^{\times}$ is a group under multiplication; $0 \in R^{\times}$ only in the zero ring
- Left, right and two-sided ideals
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 33 results over 13 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 10.18.3 (standard reference, not scraped)