Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a nonzero commutative ring is local exactly when its nonunits form an ideal, exactly when one of x and 1x is a unit for every x

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For a nonzero commutative ring R, the following are equivalent:

  1. R is local;
  2. the set of nonunits of R is an ideal;
  3. for every xR, at least one of x and 1x is a unit.

When these conditions hold, the ideal of nonunits is the unique maximal ideal.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonzero commutative ring R and the Axiom of Choice.

[F1]

A local ring is a nonzero commutative ring with one maximal ideal (A local ring is a nonzero commutative ring with a unique maximal ideal).

[F2]

Assuming Choice, every proper ideal in a nonzero commutative ring lies in a maximal ideal (In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal).

[F4]

An ideal contains 0, is closed under addition and additive inverses, and absorbs multiplication by ring elements (Left, right and two-sided ideals).

Proof

technique · direct cycle of implications
1.1

Assume R is local with maximal ideal m. No element of m is a unit. Conversely, if x is a nonunit, then (x) is proper and [F2] places it in a maximal ideal, necessarily m. Thus the nonunits are exactly m, proving condition 2.

F1F2F3
1.2

Assume the nonunits form an ideal N. If both x and 1x were nonunits, then [F4] would give 1=x+(1x)N, contrary to [F3]. Hence condition 3 holds.

F3F4
1.3

Assume condition 3 and let N be the nonunits. By [F3], 0N. If xN and rR, then rx cannot be a unit, since an inverse for rx would make x a unit; also x cannot be a unit.

F3algebra
2.1

If x,yN and u=x+y were a unit, then xu1 and yu1=1xu1 would both be nonunits, because a unit among either would make x or y a unit. This contradicts condition 3. Thus x+yN, and [F4] with step 1.3 shows that N is an ideal.

F3F4step 1.3
3.1

The ideal N is proper because 1N. Every proper ideal consists entirely of nonunits, so it is contained in N. Hence N is maximal and is the only maximal ideal; by [F1], R is local.

F1F3F4step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 33 results over 13 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources