How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The degree of the Hilbert-Samuel polynomial equals the dimension of the support
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
Let be a Noetherian local ring, let be a finite -module, and let be an ideal of definition for . Then the Hilbert-Samuel polynomial has degree
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a Noetherian local ring , a nonzero finite -module , and an ideal of definition for .
The dimension of is the least number of generators of an ideal of definition for , and such generating tuples are systems of parameters for (For a finite module, the dimension is the least size of an ideal of definition, and such tuples are systems of parameters).
Hilbert-Samuel leading coefficients are additive at the maximum polynomial degree in a short exact sequence (Hilbert-Samuel leading coefficients are additive at the top polynomial degree).
Artin-Rees compares the filtration induced on a finite submodule with its intrinsic adic filtration (Artin-Rees controls intersections of submodules with high ideal powers).
The Hilbert-Samuel polynomial exists (The Hilbert-Samuel function agrees eventually with a rational polynomial in binomial form).
If a finite module satisfies , then for some (Determinant trick for Nakayama).
Every ideal of a Noetherian commutative ring is finitely generated (A commutative ring is Noetherian exactly when every ideal is finitely generated, exactly when its ideals satisfy the ascending chain condition, and exactly when every nonempty set of ideals has a maximal member).
In a local ring, the nonunits are exactly the elements of its maximal ideal (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a nonzero commutative ring is local exactly when its nonunits form an ideal, exactly when one of and is a unit for every ).
Proof
Put and let . Then is Noetherian local, is a faithful finite -module, and . If generate , there is a surjection and a faithful injection , . The surjection gives . Applying [L3] to the injection gives a bounded shift and the reverse estimate for large . Hence and have the same degree. It remains to prove the theorem for the ring .
Let and let be the least number of generators of an ideal of definition of ; [L1] identifies with . Choose an ideal of definition . The ideals and are finite by [L6] and have the same radical . Raising finite generating sets to suitable powers and expanding products therefore gives positive integers with and . The resulting linear reindexing inequalities between and show that their eventual polynomials have the same degree. If , then is an ideal of definition, so has finite length and . If , every is a quotient of a direct sum of copies of , indexed by the degree- monomials in the . Its length is therefore bounded by a polynomial of degree , and summing the graded-piece lengths gives .
We prove by induction on . If , the increasing integer sequence is eventually constant, so for all large . Thus the finite ideal from [L6] satisfies . By [L5], some has ; since , [L7] makes a unit, and hence . Because is an ideal of definition, ; nilpotence of then makes every prime equal to , so .
Assume and take a strict chain . If , there is nothing to prove, so assume . Put . The quotient maps give , hence . Choose and write for its nonzero image in the domain . Multiplication by is injective, so is short exact; the image of is an ideal of definition in both and . Applying [L2] at the maximum of and cancels the two degree- contributions from ; if , it would force the nonzero leading coefficient of to vanish. Hence . The images of give a strict prime chain of length in . The induction hypothesis applied to gives and therefore . Since the chain was arbitrary, .
Steps 1.2 and 1.4 give , and step 1.1 transfers this equality to . Therefore .
Depends on
- The Hilbert-Samuel function agrees eventually with a rational polynomial in binomial form
- For a finite module, the dimension is the least size of an ideal of definition, and such tuples are systems of parameters
- Hilbert-Samuel leading coefficients are additive at the top polynomial degree
- Artin-Rees controls intersections of submodules with high ideal powers
- Determinant trick for Nakayama
- A commutative ring is Noetherian exactly when every ideal is finitely generated, exactly when its ideals satisfy the ascending chain condition, and exactly when every nonempty set of ideals has a maximal member
- Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a nonzero commutative ring is local exactly when its nonunits form an ideal, exactly when one of $x$ and $1-x$ is a unit for every $x$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen B. Altman and Steven L. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, Theorem (21.4) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks Project, Section 10.60: Dimension (standard reference, not scraped)