Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The degree of the Hilbert-Samuel polynomial equals the dimension of the support

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice.

Let (R,m) be a Noetherian local ring, let M≠0 be a finite R-module, and let I be an ideal of definition for M. Then the Hilbert-Samuel polynomial PI,M has degree deg⁡PI,M=dim⁡Supp⁡(M).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a Noetherian local ring (R,m), a nonzero finite R-module M, and an ideal of definition I for M.

[L1]

The dimension of Supp⁡(M) is the least number of generators of an ideal of definition for M, and such generating tuples are systems of parameters for M (For a finite module, the dimension is the least size of an ideal of definition, and such tuples are systems of parameters).

[L2]

Hilbert-Samuel leading coefficients are additive at the maximum polynomial degree in a short exact sequence (Hilbert-Samuel leading coefficients are additive at the top polynomial degree).

[L3]

Artin-Rees compares the filtration induced on a finite submodule with its intrinsic adic filtration (Artin-Rees controls intersections of submodules with high ideal powers).

[L5]

If a finite module N satisfies JN=N, then (1−a)N=0 for some a∈J (Determinant trick for Nakayama).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L3L4givenalgebra

Put A=R/Ann⁡R(M) and let J=IA. Then A is Noetherian local, M is a faithful finite A-module, and Spec⁡(A)=Supp⁡R(M). If m1,…,ms generate M, there is a surjection As↠M and a faithful injection A↪Ms, a↦(am1,…,ams). The surjection gives χJ,M(n)≤sχJ,A(n). Applying [L3] to the injection gives a bounded shift c and the reverse estimate χJ,A(n−c)≤sχJ,M(n) for large n. Hence PJ,A and PI,M have the same degree. It remains to prove the theorem for the ring A.

1.2L1L4L6algebra

Let r=deg⁡PJ,A and let d be the least number of generators of an ideal of definition of A; [L1] identifies d with dim⁡A. Choose an ideal of definition Q=(x1,…,xd). The ideals J and Q are finite by [L6] and have the same radical mA. Raising finite generating sets to suitable powers and expanding products therefore gives positive integers u,v with Ju⊆Q and Qv⊆J. The resulting linear reindexing inequalities between χJ,A and χQ,A show that their eventual polynomials have the same degree. If d=0, then Q=0 is an ideal of definition, so A has finite length and r=deg⁡PQ,A=0. If d>0, every Qn/Qn+1 is a quotient of a direct sum of (n+d−1d−1) copies of A/Q, indexed by the degree-n monomials in the xi. Its length is therefore bounded by a polynomial of degree d−1, and summing the graded-piece lengths gives r=deg⁡PQ,A≤d.

1.3L5L6L7algebra

We prove dim⁡A≤r by induction on r. If r=0, the increasing integer sequence ℓA(A/Jn+1) is eventually constant, so Jn/Jn+1=0 for all large n. Thus the finite ideal Jn from [L6] satisfies J(Jn)=Jn. By [L5], some a∈J has (1−a)Jn=0; since a∈J⊆mA, [L7] makes 1−a a unit, and hence Jn=0. Because J is an ideal of definition, J=mA; nilpotence of J then makes every prime equal to mA, so dim⁡A=0.

1.4L2inductionalgebra

Assume r>0 and take a strict chain p0⊂p1⊂⋯⊂pe=mA. If e=0, there is nothing to prove, so assume e>0. Put B=A/p0. The quotient maps A/Jn+1A↠B/Jn+1B give χJ,B(n)≤χJ,A(n), hence s:=deg⁡PJ,B≤r. Choose x∈p1∖p0 and write xˉ for its nonzero image in the domain B. Multiplication by xˉ is injective, so 0→B→xˉB→C:=B/xˉB→0 is short exact; the image of J is an ideal of definition in both B and C. Applying [L2] at the maximum of s and deg⁡PJ,C cancels the two degree-s contributions from B; if deg⁡PJ,C≥s, it would force the nonzero leading coefficient of PJ,C to vanish. Hence deg⁡PJ,C<s≤r. The images of p1,…,pe give a strict prime chain of length e−1 in C. The induction hypothesis applied to C gives e−1≤dim⁡C≤deg⁡PJ,C≤r−1, and therefore e≤r. Since the chain was arbitrary, dim⁡A≤r.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.4∎

Steps 1.2 and 1.4 give r=d=dim⁡A, and step 1.1 transfers this equality to M. Therefore deg⁡PI,M=dim⁡Supp⁡(M).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources