Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The degree of the Hilbert-Samuel polynomial equals the dimension of the support

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice.

Let (R,m) be a Noetherian local ring, let M0 be a finite R-module, and let I be an ideal of definition for M. Then the Hilbert-Samuel polynomial PI,M has degree

degPI,M=dimSupp(M).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a Noetherian local ring (R,m), a nonzero finite R-module M, and an ideal of definition I for M.

[L1]

The dimension of Supp(M) is the least number of generators of an ideal of definition for M, and such generating tuples are systems of parameters for M (For a finite module, the dimension is the least size of an ideal of definition, and such tuples are systems of parameters).

[L2]

Hilbert-Samuel leading coefficients are additive at the maximum polynomial degree in a short exact sequence (Hilbert-Samuel leading coefficients are additive at the top polynomial degree).

[L3]

Artin-Rees compares the filtration induced on a finite submodule with its intrinsic adic filtration (Artin-Rees controls intersections of submodules with high ideal powers).

[L5]

If a finite module N satisfies JN=N, then (1a)N=0 for some aJ (Determinant trick for Nakayama).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Put A=R/AnnR(M) and let J=IA. Then A is Noetherian local, M is a faithful finite A-module, and Spec(A)=SuppR(M). If m1,,ms generate M, there is a surjection AsM and a faithful injection AMs, a(am1,,ams). The surjection gives χJ,M(n)sχJ,A(n). Applying [L3] to the injection gives a bounded shift c and the reverse estimate χJ,A(nc)sχJ,M(n) for large n. Hence PJ,A and PI,M have the same degree. It remains to prove the theorem for the ring A.

L3L4givenalgebra
1.2

Let r=degPJ,A and let d be the least number of generators of an ideal of definition of A; [L1] identifies d with dimA. Choose an ideal of definition Q=(x1,,xd). The ideals J and Q are finite by [L6] and have the same radical mA. Raising finite generating sets to suitable powers and expanding products therefore gives positive integers u,v with JuQ and QvJ. The resulting linear reindexing inequalities between χJ,A and χQ,A show that their eventual polynomials have the same degree. If d=0, then Q=0 is an ideal of definition, so A has finite length and r=degPQ,A=0. If d>0, every Qn/Qn+1 is a quotient of a direct sum of (n+d1d1) copies of A/Q, indexed by the degree-n monomials in the xi. Its length is therefore bounded by a polynomial of degree d1, and summing the graded-piece lengths gives r=degPQ,Ad.

L1L4L6algebra
1.3

We prove dimAr by induction on r. If r=0, the increasing integer sequence A(A/Jn+1) is eventually constant, so Jn/Jn+1=0 for all large n. Thus the finite ideal Jn from [L6] satisfies J(Jn)=Jn. By [L5], some aJ has (1a)Jn=0; since aJmA, [L7] makes 1a a unit, and hence Jn=0. Because J is an ideal of definition, J=mA; nilpotence of J then makes every prime equal to mA, so dimA=0.

L5L6L7algebra
1.4

Assume r>0 and take a strict chain p0p1pe=mA. If e=0, there is nothing to prove, so assume e>0. Put B=A/p0. The quotient maps A/Jn+1AB/Jn+1B give χJ,B(n)χJ,A(n), hence s:=degPJ,Br. Choose xp1p0 and write xˉ for its nonzero image in the domain B. Multiplication by xˉ is injective, so 0BxˉBC:=B/xˉB0 is short exact; the image of J is an ideal of definition in both B and C. Applying [L2] at the maximum of s and degPJ,C cancels the two degree-s contributions from B; if degPJ,Cs, it would force the nonzero leading coefficient of PJ,C to vanish. Hence degPJ,C<sr. The images of p1,,pe give a strict prime chain of length e1 in C. The induction hypothesis applied to C gives e1dimCdegPJ,Cr1, and therefore er. Since the chain was arbitrary, dimAr.

L2inductionalgebra
2.1

Steps 1.2 and 1.4 give r=d=dimA, and step 1.1 transfers this equality to M. Therefore degPI,M=dimSupp(M).

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.4

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources