How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Modulo a parameter preserves the top Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity up to the finite-annihilator correction
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
Let be a Noetherian local ring, let be a finite -module, and put . Assume and let be a system of parameters for . Put and . For a finite module on which is an ideal of definition, and for an integer with either or , write with value when or . Then
In particular, if is -regular, then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a Noetherian local ring , a nonzero finite -module of support dimension , and a system of parameters as above.
The support dimension is the least number of generators of an ideal of definition (For a finite module, the dimension is the least size of an ideal of definition, and such tuples are systems of parameters).
The degree of a nonzero finite module's Hilbert-Samuel polynomial equals its support dimension (The degree of the Hilbert-Samuel polynomial equals the dimension of the support).
For an ideal of definition generated by elements, its dimension- multiplicity is the Euler characteristic of the corresponding Koszul complex (Stacks Project, Theorem 43.15.5).
The Koszul complex on is the tensor product of the two-term complex on with the Koszul complex on . The two-term complex has homology in degree and in degree .
For a finite module , the quotient has finite length exactly when its support is contained in the closed point (Stacks Project, Remark 43.15.6).
Proof
Put and . Multiplication by gives the exact complex One has so is an ideal of definition for . Also , hence . Every prime in lies in , so [F3] makes finite length and an ideal of definition for . By [L1], each nonzero one of and has support dimension at most , and [L2] therefore gives whenever the polynomial is nonzero.
By [L2] and [F1], is the Euler characteristic of the Koszul complex on . Using the tensor decomposition in [F2] and taking homology first in the two-term direction gives the -Koszul complex on in homological degree and that on in degree . Euler characteristic is unchanged by this finite spectral sequence, so step 1.1 and [F1] give
If is -regular, then . By [L2], , so . Step 2.1 therefore makes nonzero. The degree bound in step 1.1 forces , and hence . This proves
Therefore the parameter-reduction formula holds.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Project, Lemmas 10.60.13 and 10.60.14 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks Project, Theorem 43.15.5: multiplicity as Koszul Euler characteristic (standard reference, not scraped)
- Allen B. Altman and Steven L. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, §21 (standard reference, not scraped)