How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Multiplicity under parameter reduction with annihilator correction
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
Let be a Noetherian local ring, let be a finite -module, and put . Assume and let be a system of parameters for . Put and . For a finite module on which is an ideal of definition, and for an integer with either or , write with value when or . Then In particular, if is -regular, then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), a Noetherian local ring , a nonzero finite -module of support dimension , and a system of parameters as above.
The degree of a nonzero finite module's Hilbert-Samuel polynomial equals its support dimension under AC (The degree of the Hilbert-Samuel polynomial equals the dimension of the support).
For a finite module and an ideal of definition generated by elements, its degree- coefficient is the Euler characteristic of the Koszul complex; in particular its polynomial has degree at most (degree-r Hilbert–Samuel coefficient as Koszul Euler characteristic).
When has finite length, the quotient and annihilator each have -quotients of finite length, and their Koszul Euler characteristics satisfy the first-element subtraction formula (koszul euler characteristic first element reduction).
Degree-indexed multiplicity and Koszul Euler characteristic use the displayed polynomial and homological sign conventions (koszul euler characteristic and degree indexed multiplicity).
Proof
Put and . The parameter hypothesis gives finite length of , so [L3] makes a module-relative ideal of definition for both and (including the zero-module case). The -generator degree bound in [L2] gives whenever the polynomials are nonzero.
By [L2], . The exact first-element reduction [L3] makes this . Apply [L2] to each -complex, with the degree-indexed convention [L4], to obtain
If is -regular, then . By [L1], , so . Step 2.1 therefore makes nonzero. The degree bound in step 1.1 forces , and hence . This proves
Therefore the parameter-reduction formula holds.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Project, Lemmas 10.60.13 and 10.60.14 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks Project, Theorem 43.15.5: multiplicity as Koszul Euler characteristic (standard reference, not scraped)
- Allen B. Altman and Steven L. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, §21 (standard reference, not scraped)