How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
degree-r Hilbert–Samuel coefficient as Koszul Euler characteristic
Statement
Assume AC. Let be a commutative Noetherian local ring, a finite -module and with . Use for all sufficiently large . Then or , and The degree- coefficient may vanish. This includes , and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a commutative Noetherian local ring , a finite -module , and with .
We assume The Axiom of Choice.
Euler characteristic and every coefficient use the fixed convention: koszul euler characteristic and degree indexed multiplicity.
All the Koszul homology modules here have finite length: koszul homology finite length for an ideal of definition.
Euler characteristic equals the alternating sum of finite-length terms: bounded finite length complex euler identities.
A sufficiently deep shifted-adic quotient has the homology of and finite-length terms; for a unit ideal is acyclic: shifted adic koszul filtration euler comparison.
The module-relative eventual rational polynomial exists uniquely: The module-relative Hilbert–Samuel polynomial exists without a dimension theorem.
Finite length is additive and passes to quotients: Module length is additive in short exact sequences.
Proof
If , both sides are zero. If , the polynomial is zero and the Koszul complex is acyclic. If , then and has finite length; the complex is , its Euler characteristic is and is that constant, so . The remaining argument concerns and a proper ideal.
Put . For , degree- monomials in the generators give a surjection , where is the number of tuples of nonnegative integers summing to . Encode a tuple by marks with separators, including adjacent separators for zero entries. This is a bijection with choices of separator positions, giving . Consequently .
Choose deep enough for the shifted-adic comparison and for for every . This is possible since only finitely many inequalities are required. The term in cochain degree of is . Homology comparison and term cancellation therefore give The AC hypothesis supplies that in the finite-length and tail lemmas.
Define . For the identity is the single term . If it holds at , subtract its value at from its value at . The coefficient of becomes , with out-of-range binomials zero; the two endpoint coefficients are and . This proves the identity for every by induction.
Summing along the -adic filtration gives . For the last identity, tuples in variables of total at most correspond bijectively to tuples in variables of total exactly , by adjoining the slack ; the same separator count applies. This holds for every .
The eventual polynomial is nonnegative at all sufficiently large integers. If it is nonzero, its leading coefficient is positive: division by its highest power of makes the lower terms tend to zero, so the sign is eventually the leading sign. If its degree exceeded , that same division would make the upper bound from the preceding step tend to zero while the polynomial tends to a positive leading coefficient. This is impossible. Hence or .
For , the binomial expansion gives plus terms of degree at most ; a constant has difference zero. By linearity, differences annihilate every monomial of degree less than and take to . The degree bound thus gives , including the zero polynomial. At the preceding finite-difference identity is precisely the Euler sum, so it equals . Together with the initial cases this proves the theorem.
Remarks
Source locators: Stacks 43.15.4 (finite differences), Theorem 43.15.5 and Remark 43.15.6; Hochster printed pp.106–108. In the present convention the quotient by contributes , not . The monomial count proves the degree bound independently of a dimension theorem. No parameter-reduction result is a premise.
Depends on
- koszul euler characteristic and degree indexed multiplicity
- koszul homology finite length for an ideal of definition
- bounded finite length complex euler identities
- shifted adic koszul filtration euler comparison
- The module-relative Hilbert–Samuel polynomial exists without a dimension theorem
- The Axiom of Choice
- Module length is additive in short exact sequences
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Project, 43.15.4–6; local proof with stated module-relative and coefficient conventions (standard reference, not scraped)
- Hochster, Math 615 Winter 2012, pp.104–108: Euler characteristics and the multiplicity theorem (standard reference, not scraped)