How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For a finite module, the dimension is the least size of an ideal of definition, and such tuples are systems of parameters
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a Noetherian local ring and let be a finite -module. Put Then:
- is the least integer for which there exist with of finite length;
- whenever have this property, they form a system of parameters for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a Noetherian local ring and a nonzero finite -module .
Under the assumed Choice, in a finite-dimensional Noetherian local ring the dimension is the least number of generators of an ideal whose radical is the maximal ideal (Local dimension is the minimal number of generators of an ideal with maximal radical).
A system of parameters is a -tuple in whose generated ideal has radical (Systems of parameters and parameter ideals).
Every ideal in a Noetherian commutative ring is finitely generated (A commutative ring is Noetherian exactly when every ideal is finitely generated, exactly when its ideals satisfy the ascending chain condition, and exactly when every nonempty set of ideals has a maximal member).
The height of an ideal generated by elements is at most (Krull's height theorem).
A finite module has support , and under Choice a radical ideal is the intersection of all primes containing it (For a finite module, support is the set of primes containing the annihilator, The radical of an ideal is the intersection of the prime ideals containing it).
Under Choice, if a finite module over a local ring equals its maximal-ideal multiple, it is zero (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma).
Proof
Let and . The ring is nonzero, Noetherian and local; is a faithful finite -module. By [L5], , and prime correspondence identifies this space with , so . The ideal has a finite generating list by [L3]; since it is maximal, it is minimal over its own generating ideal. Under the assumed AC, [L4] bounds its height by that list length. Thus and [L1] applies to .
A nonzero finite -module has finite length exactly when its support is . In one direction, a finite composition series has simple factors : for a nonzero element of a simple factor, its annihilator is maximal, hence is the unique maximal ideal . Thus for the series length , and [L5] gives support contained in ; nonzero has in its support by [L6]. Conversely, if support is , [L5] gives . Choose finite generators of by [L3]. Each has a positive power annihilating , so some power annihilates . The finite filtration has finite -vector-space quotients: each is generated by products of finite generating lists for and . Refining each vector-space quotient by a basis flag gives a finite composition series.
Fix an ideal and put . By [L6], . For each prime of , if then . If , then by step 1.1 and lies in the maximal ideal of the local ring ; [L6] applied there gives . Hence . By [L5], this support is exactly if and only if .
Combining steps 2.1 and 1.2, for ideals the quotient has finite length exactly when . Applying [L1] in , the least size of a generating tuple in with this property is . Every such tuple in lifts to a tuple in because the quotient map sends onto ; finite choices suffice. This proves part 1.
If satisfy that has finite length, step 3.1 gives . Their images in therefore form a system of parameters by [L2]; this is the asserted module parameter condition. For , the tuple is empty and the same argument says itself has finite length.
Steps 3.1 and 4.1 prove both claims.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Systems of parameters and parameter ideals
- Local dimension is the minimal number of generators of an ideal with maximal radical
- A commutative ring is Noetherian exactly when every ideal is finitely generated, exactly when its ideals satisfy the ascending chain condition, and exactly when every nonempty set of ideals has a maximal member
- Krull's height theorem
- For a finite module, support is the set of primes containing the annihilator
- The radical of an ideal is the intersection of the prime ideals containing it
- Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma
Used by
- One regular system of parameters implies Cohen--Macaulayness Corollary
- Polynomial extension preserves Cohen--Macaulayness Corollary
- Coherent duality on a singular plane cubic Example
- A regular parameter quotient preserves the depth--dimension gap Lemma
- A sharp dimension bound makes equations regular on an equidimensional Cohen-Macaulay fibre Lemma
- Depth at a prime is bounded by local support dimension Lemma
- Ext concentration for a Cohen–Macaulay quotient of a regular local ring Lemma
- Finite local length exactly when no common local branch Lemma
- Induction along a Cohen--Macaulay parameter sequence Lemma
- Reflection basic invariants form a regular sequence Lemma
- The first parameter of a Cohen--Macaulay module is regular Lemma
- Parameters and regular sequences in Cohen--Macaulay modules Theorem
- The degree of the Hilbert-Samuel polynomial equals the dimension of the support Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Project, Proposition 10.60.9 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Allen B. Altman and Steven L. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, Theorem (21.4) (standard reference, not scraped)