How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For a finite module, support is the set of primes containing the annihilator
Statement
If is a finitely generated left -module, then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring and a finitely generated left -module .
A prime ideal lies in exactly when some element of has annihilator inside it (A prime lies in the support exactly when some element has annihilator inside it).
If generate , then (A finite module has the union of its generator-cyclic supports).
The annihilator of is (Annihilators, torsion elements and the torsion subset of a module).
Proof
If , [L1] gives with . Since every element of kills every element of , one has .
Choose generators of . If and no is contained in , choose for every . Then , but annihilates every generator and hence all of , so , a contradiction. Thus for some , and [L2] gives .
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove the support-annihilator formula.
Depends on
Used by
- A finite module that vanishes at a prime vanishes on some principal neighbourhood of that prime Corollary
- The support is the union of the closures of the associated primes Corollary
- Delta invariant of a curve singularity Definition
- The conductor of a normalization Definition
- Arithmetic genus, geometric genus and delta invariants Lemma
- Depth at a prime is bounded by local support dimension Lemma
- depth two excludes finite punctured extension Lemma
- Expected ranks and determinantal regular sequences force a free complex to be exact Lemma
- Fibrewise exactness of a finite free complex is open in a flat Cohen-Macaulay family Lemma
- Finite local length exactly when no common local branch Lemma
- koszul euler characteristic first element reduction Lemma
- koszul homology finite length for an ideal of definition Lemma
- Regular hyperplane step for coherent support induction Lemma
- Standard smooth algebras are finitely presented and flat Lemma
- Support dimension under field extension Lemma
- The flat locus of a finitely presented algebra is open Lemma
- The normalization is an isomorphism over the normal locus Lemma
- Completion preserves dimension and Hilbert-Samuel data Theorem
- For a finite module, the dimension is the least size of an ideal of definition, and such tuples are systems of parameters Theorem
- Primary submodules of finite modules are characterized by a singleton associated-prime set Theorem
- Support of a finite-type quasi-coherent sheaf is closed Theorem
- Support of a tensor product of finite modules is the intersection of the supports Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., (13.27) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 10.40.5 (standard reference, not scraped)