Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite local length exactly when no common local branch

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field, let p∈A2(k), put R=k[x,y], m=mp, and O=Rm, and let f,g∈m be nonzero. Then the following are equivalent: (1) (f,g)O is m-primary; (2) O/(f,g)O has finite length as an O-module; (3) f and g have no common irreducible factor h∈k[x,y] with h(p)=0, equivalently no height-one prime of R contained in m contains (f,g). If the conditions fail the length is infinite, and if they hold (f,g)O is a parameter ideal of the two-dimensional regular local ring O, so O/(f,g)O is a zero-dimensional local ring of finite length. Moreover O is a UFD. Every ideal I⊆O with radical mO contains a power of mO, and its quotient satisfies ℓO(O/I)=dim⁡k(O/I). For a surjective ring map O→V and a V-module M, the submodules over O and V coincide, so its composition length is unchanged.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an algebraically closed or arbitrary field k, a point p∈A2(k), R=k[x,y], m=mp, O=Rm, and nonzero f,g∈m; write k for the field and note dim⁡R=2.

[F2]

m=mp is a maximal ideal, R/m≅k, and ht⁡(m)=dim⁡R=2 Evaluation at a point has kernel (x_1-a_1, ..., x_n-a_n), Maximal ideals of an affine domain have full height, Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring, Field. AC is used here through the height formula.

[F3]

O=Rm is a Noetherian local ring with maximal ideal mO, of dimension dim⁡O=ht⁡(m)=2; it is regular: after translation m=(x,y), the classes of x,y span mO/(mO)2 and are independent, since clearing a denominator with nonzero constant term cannot kill a nonzero linear part. Thus its embedding dimension is 2=dim⁡O Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian, Rp is local with unique maximal ideal pRp, A local ring is a nonzero commutative ring with a unique maximal ideal, Left and right Noetherian rings, The height of a prime ideal, embedding dimension and regular local ring, Localisation does not increase Krull dimension.

[F4]

Contraction gives inclusion-preserving bijections between the primes of O and the primes of R contained in m (inverse p↦pO), and between the primes of a quotient O/I and the primes of O containing I Prime ideals of a localization are exactly the primes disjoint from the denominator set, Prime ideals of a quotient ring are exactly the prime ideals containing the ideal.

[F5]

For an ideal I of the local ring (O,mO) one has: I is mO-primary exactly when I=mO; and a tuple (x1,…,xd)∈(mO)d with d=dim⁡O is a system of parameters exactly when (x1,…,xd)=mO, in which case (x1,…,xd) is a parameter ideal The radical of an ideal, Systems of parameters and parameter ideals, Parameter ideals are exactly the m-primary d-generated ideals.

[F6]

A commutative Noetherian ring is Artinian if and only if every prime ideal of it is maximal; a commutative ring is Artinian if and only if it has finite length as a module over itself; and every prime of an Artinian ring is maximal A Noetherian ring is Artinian exactly when every prime ideal is maximal, A commutative ring is Artinian exactly when it has finite length as a module over itself, Every prime ideal of an Artinian ring is maximal, Left and right Artinian rings, Composition series and length of a module. AC is used through these characterisations.

[F7]

AC is assumed throughout The Axiom of Choice; it enters only through the height, prime-existence and Artinian characterisations of [F2], [F5] and [F6]. No further choice is made.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3givenalgebra

Translating the coordinates by p replaces mp by (x,y) and induces a k-algebra automorphism of R carrying f,g to nonzero elements of (x,y); lengths and primary-ness are unchanged, so assume p=0 and m=(x,y). Then R is a Noetherian UFD of dimension 2, ht⁡(m)=2, and O is a two-dimensional regular local ring with maximal ideal mO.

1.2F1F2algebra

Every prime q of R with (f,g)⊆q⊆m has height 1 or 2: height 0 is impossible because f≠0, and height at most 2 since q⊆m and ht⁡(m)=2. A height-two prime contained in m equals m, and a height-one prime is generated by an irreducible element h, which lies in m exactly when h(p)=0.

1.3F1F2F3F4algebraconstruct

The ring O is a UFD: factor a numerator in R and discard the irreducible factors outside m, which become units. Each remaining factor h stays prime and nonunit, since O/(h)O is a localisation of the domain R/(h) at denominators disjoint from (h). Clearing denominators and using factorisation in R proves uniqueness. Also, if I⊆O has radical mO=(x,y)O, then xa,yb∈I for some positive a,b, and every monomial of degree a+b−1 is divisible by xa or yb; hence (mO)a+b−1⊆I. For a quotient Q=O/I with this containment, the finite filtration by powers of mO has finite-dimensional k-vector space factors, each killed by mO. Refine each factor by a finite vector-space flag to obtain simple factors k=O/mO. Therefore ℓO(Q)=dim⁡kQ. Finally, for any quotient map O↠V and a V-module M, the O-submodules and V-submodules coincide, so ℓO(M)=ℓV(M).

2.1step 1.1F4F5algebra

By [F4], the primes of O containing (f,g)O are exactly the primes qO with (f,g)⊆q⊆m, and qO=mO exactly for q=m. Hence (f,g)O is mO-primary, equivalently (f,g)O=mO by [F5], if and only if m is the only prime of R with (f,g)⊆q⊆m: here the radical is the intersection of the primes containing the ideal The radical of an ideal is the intersection of the prime ideals containing it.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1F1algebra

By step 1.2, the condition of step 2.1 fails exactly when there is a height-one prime (h)⊆m containing (f,g), that is, exactly when f and g have a common irreducible factor h with h(p)=0. This proves the equivalence of condition (3) with condition (1).

3.2step 2.1F3F4F5F6

Assume the conditions hold, so (f,g)O is mO-primary and (f,g)O=mO with f,g∈mO and dim⁡O=2. Then (f,g) is a system of parameters and (f,g)O is a parameter ideal of the regular local ring O [F5]. The quotient O/(f,g)O is Noetherian [F3], it is local with maximal ideal mO/(f,g)O, and by [F4] its only prime is that maximal ideal; hence every prime of it is maximal, so it is Artinian and therefore of finite length as an O-module [F6]. In particular (1) implies (2), and the described quotient is zero-dimensional of finite length.

4.1step 3.1F1F3F4F6givenF7∎

Conversely assume there is a common irreducible factor h with h(p)=0, so that (f,g)⊆(h)⊆m and (h) has height one. Then (h)O is a prime of O containing (f,g)O and different from mO because dim⁡O=2>ht⁡((h))=1 [F1, F3]. Its image in O/(f,g)O is prime and not maximal [F4], so O/(f,g)O is not Artinian; by [F6] it cannot have finite length, so its length is infinite. Hence (2) implies (1), the length is infinite whenever the conditions fail, and the equivalence of (1), (2) and (3) is established.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

105 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources