Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Symmetry, additivity and local nature of intersection multiplicity

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let C,D be plane projective curves over the algebraically closed field k and let p∈P2, with all local intersection multiplicities below assumed finite. Then:

  1. Ip(C,D)=Ip(D,C).
  2. Ip(C,D)=0 iff p∉C∩D, and Ip(C,D)≥1 iff p∈C∩D.
  3. If G1,G2 are square-free forms with no common factor, so that V(G1G2) is again a plane projective curve, and if the three values are finite, then Ip(C,V(G1G2))=Ip(C,V(G1))+Ip(C,V(G2)).
  4. If G′ is a form such that the local equation of V(G′) at p differs from that of D by a multiple of a local equation of C — in particular if G′=G+AF with A a form of degree deg⁡G−deg⁡F and V(G′) is a plane curve — then Ip(C,V(G′))=Ip(C,D).
  5. Ip(C,D) depends only on the local branches of C and D through p.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, plane curves C=V(F), D=V(G) over the algebraically closed field k, a point p, a common local ring O=OP2,p with maximal ideal mp, and local equations f,g of C,D at p; Ip(C,D)=ℓO(O/(f,g)) Local intersection multiplicity of two plane curves.

[F1]

O is the localisation of the polynomial UFD of the plane, hence a unique factorisation domain by the explicit factorisation argument in the finiteness lemma (Proof 1.3); two local equations have a common irreducible factor exactly when the curves share a local branch at p, and then the length is infinite, while O/(f,g) has finite length exactly when f,g are coprime in O Finite local length exactly when no common local branch, Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes, Unique factorisation domain, Irreducible and prime elements of an integral domain.

[F2]

Length is additive in short exact sequences of O-modules, and the length of a module depends only on its isomorphism class Module length is additive in short exact sequences, Composition series and length of a module. Kernels and images of module homomorphisms and quotients by ideals are the usual ones Module homomorphism and isomorphism, kernel, image and cokernel, The quotient ring R/I with (r+I)(s+I)=rs+I.

[F3]

Ip is unchanged by replacing local equations by other generators of the same local ideal, by chart changes and by affine or projective coordinate changes Invariance of the local intersection multiplicity, Localising twice is localising once at the multiplicative set generated by both denominator sets, Localisation commutes with quotient rings: S−1R/S−1I≅Sˉ−1(R/I).

[F4]

AC is assumed; it enters through the finiteness and localisation suppliers The Axiom of Choice.

Proof

1.1F2given

Symmetry: O/(f,g)=O/(g,f), so Ip(C,D)=Ip(D,C).

1.2F2givenalgebra

Vanishing: if p∉C∩D, one of f,g is a unit of O, so (f,g)=O and O/(f,g)=0 has length 0; if p∈C∩D, then f,g∈mp, so (f,g)⊆mp and the quotient O/(f,g) maps onto O/mp≠0, hence has positive length.

1.3F1F2algebra

Additivity: with G1,G2 square-free and coprime and all values finite, let g2 be the local equation of V(G2). Since Ip(C,V(G2)) is finite, [F1] shows f and g2 are coprime in O. Consider the sequence of O-modules 0⟶O/(f,g1)→ ⋅g2 O/(f,g1g2)→ π O/(f,g2)⟶0. The map π is the natural reduction, and its kernel is (f,g2)/(f,g1g2), which is exactly the image of multiplication by g2, so the sequence is exact at the middle; injectivity of multiplication by g2 holds because g2z∈(f,g1g2) implies f∣g2(z−bg1) for some b, and coprimality of f and g2 gives z∈(f,g1). Length additivity in [F2] now gives the displayed identity.

1.4F2F3givenalgebra

Invariance under adding a multiple: if G′ has local equation g′=g+af at p, then (f,g′)=(f,g) as ideals of O, so Ip(C,V(G′))=ℓO(O/(f,g′))=ℓO(O/(f,g))=Ip(C,D); for a form G′=G+AF of the same degree as G the local equation has exactly this shape by [F3].

1.5F1F3given

Locality: the quotient O/(f,g) is computed from the germs of local equations at p, so replacing C,D by curves with the same local branches at p leaves f,g unchanged up to units in O and leaves the length unchanged; this is the content of [F3].

2.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4step 1.5F4∎

Statements (1)–(5) are established in steps 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

81 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources