Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Invariance of the local intersection multiplicity

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. In the situation of the definition, Ip(C,D) is unchanged when

(a) the defining forms F,G are multiplied by nonzero constants; (b) the local equations f,g are replaced by any other generating pair of the ideal (f,g)OP2,p, in particular by f+ag and g or by units times f,g; (c) a different standard chart containing p, or an affine change of coordinates at p, is used for both curves; (d) a projective change of coordinates A∈PGL3(k) is applied to C and D and p is replaced by A(p), so that Ip(C,D)=IA(p)(A(C),A(D)).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, plane curves C=V(F), D=V(G) over the algebraically closed field k, a point p with no common local component, and local equations f,g of C,D at p in O=OP2,p; Ip(C,D)=ℓO(O/(f,g)) Local intersection multiplicity of two plane curves.

[F1]

Length of a module depends only on the isomorphism class of the module, and is additive over direct sums of quotients; quotienting a ring by an ideal depends only on the ideal Composition series and length of a module, Module length is additive in short exact sequences.

[F3]

The dehomogenisations of F in different charts containing p are related by multiplication by a unit of O; a projective change of coordinates A maps the local ring at p isomorphically onto the local ring at A(p) and the local equations of A(C),A(D) accordingly standard projective opens are affine spaces, projective coordinate morphisms well defined, morphism to projective space homogeneous coordinates, Plane projective curves and their components.

[F4]

In the local ring O at a point of the plane, a local equation of C is well defined up to a unit, the local ring is independent of the chart containing p, and the quotient O/(f,g) has finite length when there is no common local component Multiplicity of a plane curve at a point, Finite local length exactly when no common local branch, Localisation commutes with quotient rings: S−1R/S−1I≅Sˉ−1(R/I).

[F5]

AC is assumed; it enters only through the cited localisation and length suppliers The Axiom of Choice.

Proof

1.1F1F4given

For (a): multiplying F by λ∈k× multiplies the local equation f by the unit λ of O, and similarly for G; the ideal (f,g) is therefore unchanged, and Ip=ℓO(O/(f,g)) is unchanged.

1.2F1givenalgebra

For (b): if f′,g′ generate the same ideal as f,g, then the ideals (f,g) and (f′,g′) are equal, so the quotients O/(f,g) and O/(f′,g′) are equal rings and have the same length. In particular f+ag with g generates the same ideal because f=(f+ag)−ag, and multiplying f or g by a unit does not change the ideal.

2.1step 1.1F2F3F4given

For (c): let O′ be the local ring computed in another chart containing p, or after an affine change of coordinates at p. The chart transition and coordinate changes induce ring isomorphisms O→O′ carrying the local equations of C and D to local equations, hence carrying the ideal (f,g) to the corresponding ideal (f′,g′); length is invariant under ring isomorphism, so the two computations agree.

2.2step 1.1F3F4given

For (d): a projective change of coordinates A induces an isomorphism of the local ring at p with the local ring at A(p) and carries local equations of C,D at p to local equations of A(C),A(D) at A(p) [F3]; since length is invariant under isomorphism, Ip(C,D)=IA(p)(A(C),A(D)), with finiteness preserved on both sides by [F4].

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2givenF5∎

Statements (a)–(d) are proved in steps 1.1, 1.2, 2.1 and 2.2, so Ip(C,D) depends only on the curves and the point, not on the chosen defining forms, local equations, chart, affine coordinates or projective coordinates.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Local intersection multiplicity of two plane curves.

Dependency tree · two levels

94 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources