Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Intersection with a line is the order of vanishing of the restricted equation

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let L=V(ℓ)⊆P2 be a line, C=V(F) a plane projective curve with L⊈C, and p∈L∩C. Identify L with P1 and let 0≠F∣L∈k[s,t] be the restriction of F to L, a binary form of degree deg⁡F when L is parametrised by linear forms. Then Ip(C,L) equals the order of vanishing of F∣L at the point of P1 corresponding to p.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an algebraically closed field k, a line L=V(ℓ) with ℓ a nonzero linear form, a plane projective curve C=V(F) of degree d≥1 not containing L, and p∈L∩C.

[F1]

L is a plane projective curve of degree one, isomorphic to P1 by a linear parametrisation; under such a parametrisation the restriction of a degree-d form is a binary form of degree d in the two parameters, which is nonzero because L⊈C Plane projective curves and their components, projective space points, morphism to projective space homogeneous coordinates, standard projective opens are affine spaces.

[F2]

Choose linear coordinates on the plane chart taking L to y=0 and p to the origin. Then OL,p=k[x](x) by localisation commuting with quotients. Its only primes are (0) and (x) (a nonzero prime below (x) contains an irreducible divisor, necessarily associate to x), so its dimension is one; its cotangent space has basis the class of x, so it is regular. Thus the local ring OL,p is a discrete valuation ring with maximal ideal generated by the image of any local parameter t vanishing at p; this is the one-dimensional regular local ring case, and the image of ℓ is a local equation of L in OP2,p one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs, Discrete valuation rings, Uniformising parameters, A local ring is a nonzero commutative ring with a unique maximal ideal.

[F3]

Localisation commutes with quotients, and Ip(C,L)=ℓOP2,p(OP2,p/(f,ℓ)) for local equations f,ℓ Local intersection multiplicity of two plane curves, Localisation commutes with quotient rings: S−1R/S−1I≅Sˉ−1(R/I), Finite local length exactly when no common local branch.

[F4]

In a discrete valuation ring V with uniformiser π, every nonzero x has a normal form x=uπv(x) with u a unit and v the valuation, and ℓV(V/(x))=v(x) Every nonzero fraction is a unit times a power of a uniformiser, Length and valuation in a DVR, Composition series and length of a module. The order of vanishing of a nonzero element of the function field of P1 at a point is the valuation of the corresponding discrete valuation ring Discrete valuation rings, Uniformising parameters.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3construct

The quotient OP2,p/(f,ℓ) is canonically the local ring of the line at p modulo the image fˉ of f: by [F3] applied to the quotient by (ℓ), the quotient of the plane local ring by (f,ℓ) is OL,p/(fˉ). Its submodules over the plane local ring and over the quotient ring OL,p coincide, since the action factors through the surjection; thus their lengths coincide. By [F1] the image fˉ is the germ of the restriction F∣L, a nonzero element of the discrete valuation ring OL,p.

2.1step 1.1F2F4

Let t be a local parameter of L≅P1 at the point corresponding to p, so that the maximal ideal of V=OL,p is (t) and t is a uniformiser. By [F4] the length ℓV(V/(fˉ)) equals the valuation v(fˉ), which is the order of vanishing of F∣L at that point.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1given∎

Combining step 1.1 and step 2.1, Ip(C,L)=ℓOP2,p(OP2,p/(f,ℓ))=ℓV(V/(fˉ))=v(F∣L), the order of vanishing of F∣L at the point of P1 corresponding to p.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

93 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources