Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Multiplicity of a plane curve at a point

Definition

Let C=V(F)⊆P2 be a plane projective curve over the algebraically closed field k Plane projective curves and their components and let p∈P2. Let D+(xi) be a standard chart containing p, identified with A2 by the ratio coordinates, and let f be the dehomogenisation of F in that chart projective hypersurface affine pieces, standard projective opens are affine spaces. Choosing affine coordinates (u,v) of A2 centred at p, expand the polynomial f by total degree,

f=fm+fm+1+⋯+fd,fj homogeneous of degree j,fm≠0.

The multiplicity of C at p is

mp(C):=m,

the least degree of a term in such a centred expansion; we call fm a lowest-degree part of a local equation of C at p. For p∉C set mp(C)=0, and for p∈C the number m=mp(C)≥1 is also characterised as

mp(C)=max⁡{ n≥0:f∈mp n },

where mp⊆OP2,p is the maximal ideal of the local ring of the plane at p and f is any local equation of C at p Germs of regular functions and the local ring at a point of a classical affine variety, The local ring at a point of an affine variety is the localization at its maximal ideal, Localisation at a prime ideal: Rp=(R∖p)−1R, Rp is local with unique maximal ideal pRp.

Remarks

  • Well-definedness. Assume the Axiom of Choice for the cited classical-variety and defining-equation identifications The Axiom of Choice. The naming formula for the order of a fixed local equation makes no choice. The number mp(C) does not depend on the chart, on the centred affine coordinates, or on the choice of the defining form F. The local ring OP2,p is intrinsic to the point Germs of regular functions and the local ring at a point of a classical affine variety; two charts containing p give canonically isomorphic local rings and the two dehomogenisations of F differ in OP2,p by a unit, as do two defining forms of C, since V(λF)=V(F) and F is square-free up to a scalar Plane projective curves and their components, standard projective opens are affine spaces. Multiplication by a unit preserves max⁡{n:f∈mpn}, and an affine change of coordinates centred at p induces an automorphism of the local ring preserving its maximal ideal Affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms, The local ring at a point of an affine variety is the localization at its maximal ideal. In centred coordinates write O=k[u,v](u,v). The polynomial ideal (u,v)n consists exactly of polynomials with no terms of degree <n. If f∈(u,v)nO, clearing denominators gives sf∈(u,v)n for some s with s(0)≠0; its lowest nonzero homogeneous part is s(0)fm, so m≥n. Conversely m≥n implies f∈(u,v)n. Thus f∈mpn exactly when n≤m, and the maximum such n is m; this is the same number for every centred expansion, so the lowest-degree part fm is well defined up to the choice of coordinates and generates the same line of leading forms. A unit has order 0, a local equation of a curve through p has order ≥1, and f∈mp exactly when f(p)=0 Evaluation and roots of a polynomial in a commutative target ring; hence mp(C)≥1 if and only if p∈C, and in particular mp(C)=0 exactly for p∉C.
  • Degree bound. The centred expansion of a dehomogenised form of degree d=deg⁡C has no terms beyond degree d, so 1≤mp(C)≤d for p∈C Monomials, coefficients, degree in each variable and total degree in F[x1,…,xn].
  • Multiplicativity for a union of curves. Let F1,F2 be nonconstant square-free forms with no common factor, so that F1F2 is square-free and V(F1F2) is again a plane projective curve with components those of V(F1) and V(F2) Plane projective curves and their components. If f1,f2 are local equations at p with lowest-degree parts f1,m1,f2,m2, then f1f2 is a local equation of V(F1F2) and its lowest-degree part is the product f1,m1f2,m2, which is nonzero because a polynomial ring over a field is a domain Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes. Hence, when both curves pass through p, mp(V(F1F2))=mp(V(F1))+mp(V(F2)). The hypothesis that F1,F2 have no common factor is necessary for this reading: if F1=F2=x0 then F1F2=x02 is not square-free, V(F1F2) is the line V(x0) with mp=1 at p=[0:1:1], while the right-hand side is 2. For the same reason the convention of the page forbids nonreduced defining forms, and the product formula is stated here only for unions of distinct square-free curves.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

63 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources