Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Line multiplicities at a cusp

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the cited local-length, smoothness or Bezout suppliers.

Let C=V(y2z−x3)⊆P2 be the cuspidal cubic at the cusp p=[0:0:1], so mp(C)=2 with double tangent line T=V(y). Then

Ip(C,T)=3,Ip(C,V(x))=2,

and both values agree with the local lengths ℓ(k[x,y](x,y)/(y2−x3,y))=3 and ℓ(k[x,y](x,y)/(y2−x3,x))=2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC The Axiom of Choice, an algebraically closed field k, the curve C=V(y2z−x3) with the affine chart z=1, affine equation f=y2−x3, the cusp p=(0,0), and O=k[x,y](x,y).

[F1]

The homogeneous equation y2z−x3 is primitive and linear in z over k[x,y], so it is irreducible by Gauss lemma over a UFD, Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes. Its dehomogenisation is square-free, so C is a plane projective curve; in the chart z=1 the point p has mp(C)=2 and the lowest-degree part of f is y2, so the tangent cone is the double line V(y) Plane projective curves and their components, Multiplicity of a plane curve at a point, Tangent cone and tangent lines at a point.

[F2]

The local intersection multiplicity is the length of O/(f,g) for a local equation g of the second curve, and it is computed by Ip(C,D)=ℓO(O/(f,g)) Local intersection multiplicity of two plane curves. Simplicity: O/(y,x3) has k-basis the classes of 1,x,x2, and O/(x,y2) has k-basis the classes of 1,y Each quotient is respectively k[x](x)/(x3) or k[y](y)/(y2); the descending-power flag has simple residue-k factors, hence lengths three and two Composition series and length of a module, Finite local length exactly when no common local branch.

[F3]

The point is a double point, so the product bound gives Ip(C,L)≥2 for every line L through p, with equality exactly when the tangent cones are separated; the tangent line V(y) shares its (double) tangent direction with the cusp, so there the value is at least 3 Intersection multiplicity dominates the product of multiplicities, with equality for separated tangent cones.

Verification

1.1F1F2given

The tangent line T=V(y): the ideal (y2−x3, y) equals (y,x3) in O, so Ip(C,T)=ℓO(O/(y,x3))=3, the number of basis elements 1,x,x2.

1.2F1F2given

The transverse line V(x): the ideal (y2−x3, x) equals (x,y2), so Ip(C,V(x))=ℓO(O/(x,y2))=2, the number of basis elements 1,y.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2F1F3∎

The values 3 and 2 are compatible with the product bound: both are at least mp(C)⋅mp(line)=2, and the tangent line carries the strict inequality because the two tangent cones share the line V(y), while the line V(x) is transverse to the cusp and realises equality.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

92 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources