How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Plane Curves, Local Intersection Multiplicity, and Bézout — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Affine Algebraic Sets and Coordinate Rings
- Affine Schemes and the Structure Sheaf
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Differentials Separability and Smooth Local Presentations
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Artinian Rings and Length
- Associated Primes and Primary Decomposition
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Classical Affine Varieties: Coordinate Rings, Morphisms, and Rational Maps
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Dimension Constructible Images and Dimensions of Fibres
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Averaging and Character-Theory Prerequisites
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Fields and Cyclotomic Extensions
- Formal Power Series
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Homogeneous Resultants and Projective Intersection Length
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Integral Extensions and Going Up
- Kahler Differentials Conormal Sequences and Infinitesimal Lifting
- Koszul Complexes and Regular Sequences
- Krull Dimension and Height Theorems
- Lattice Paths and Catalan Numbers
- Limits and Colimits
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Algebra Methods in Combinatorics
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Recurrences and Rational Generating Functions
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Localisation of Modules and Support
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Morphisms Local Rings and Rational Maps of Affine Varieties
- Noether Normalisation and Nullstellensatz
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Plane Curves, Local Intersection Multiplicity, and Bézout
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Presheaves Sheaves Stalks and Sheafification
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Projective Algebraic Sets Projective Morphisms and Cones
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Rees Modules Artin Rees and Hilbert Samuel Theory
- Regular Local Rings and Homological Dimension
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schemes Subschemes and Morphisms Locally of Finite Type
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sheaf Operations Exactness Ringed Spaces and Module Pullback
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Splitting Fields
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Exponential Function
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Holomorphic Inverse Function Theorem and Weierstrass Preparation
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Valuation Rings and Discrete Valuation Rings
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Zariski Tangent Spaces, Regular Points, Smoothness, and Bertini
- Zariski Topology on Prime Spectra
2 · Summary
The examples and counterexamples compute local intersection multiplicities and exhibit each hypothesis of Bézout's theorem as necessary. The line is a common component of and , so the local multiplicities along it are infinite and the intersection sum is not finite. The imaginary conic meets the line in two conjugate non-real points, so the count of real intersection points is zero while the complex count is the full degree total. At the cusp the tangent line meets the curve with multiplicity three and the transverse line with multiplicity two; at the node in characteristic each tangent line has contact multiplicity three and other lines through the node meet it with multiplicity two. The parallel affine lines and are disjoint while their projective closures meet at a point at infinity, in characteristic the cubic and triangle examples verify the nine-point transverse count , and a tangent line to a conic shows a single distinct intersection point carrying multiplicity two. The last item records the flex of the Fermat cubic in characteristic , where the tangent line restricts to and contact order three is visible in homogeneous coordinates.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
A common component makes the intersection sum infinite
Statement refuted
False claim: Bezout's identity holds for all pairs of plane curves, without the hypothesis that the curves have no common component.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC The Axiom of Choice, the algebraically closed field , the plane projective curves of degree one and of degree two, and an arbitrary point of the shared line. In a chart containing (where or ), write and for the local equations.
and are nonconstant square-free forms, so and are plane projective curves; is an irreducible component of both, so and share the component Plane projective curves and their components.
At the local ideal is , whose nonunit irreducible generator is a local coordinate vanishing on the line; hence is not of finite length and the definition records Local intersection multiplicity of two plane curves, Finite local length exactly when no common local branch, Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring.
The Bezout theorem is stated under the no-common-component hypothesis; it computes a finite sum of finite multiplicities Bezout's theorem for plane projective curves. A module of infinite length is not a finite summand Composition series and length of a module.
Counterexample
The curves and share the line , by [F1], and at every point of that line the local ideal is generated by the common irreducible factor .
At such a point the quotient is the local ring of the line, of infinite length as an -module, so by [F2]; in particular the local multiplicities do not form a finite sum.
The line has infinitely many points, already the points for with infinite by Plane projective curves and their components (Remarks). Since the sum contains infinitely many infinite terms, it is not the finite number : the hypothesis of no common component cannot be dropped from the Bezout identity, whose statements are those of [F3].
Bezout needs algebraic closure: an imaginary conic has no real point
Statement refuted
False claim: over an arbitrary field , the degree identity holds for the -rational intersection points of two plane curves.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC The Axiom of Choice, the imaginary conic and the line , first over the ordered field The reals form a totally ordered field and then over the algebraically closed field : the complex field construction is a field, every element is uniquely , and every nonzero element has inverse and the root theorem Fundamental theorem of algebra: every nonconstant complex polynomial has a complex root give the latter assertion.
The derivatives of the quadratic are . Any repeated irreducible factor would divide all three, impossible since these coordinates have no common nonconstant factor; thus the quadratic is square-free, as is the linear form . Their degrees are two and one. Over they define curves in the convention of Plane projective curves and their components. Over , and mean the rational zero sets of these homogeneous equations; the degrees refer to the equations (or their geometric curves after extension to ), and no degree is assigned to the empty real point set.
A point has and satisfies the conic equation exactly when . In an ordered field a nonzero square is positive by trichotomy and closure of the positive cone Ordered field, so over the sum of the two squares can be zero only if , impossible for a projective point; over the solutions are and (or , ) Evaluation and roots of a polynomial in a commutative target ring, An algebraically closed field: every nonconstant polynomial has a root in the field.
Over the algebraically closed field, the Bezout identity gives Bezout's theorem for plane projective curves. At the gradients of and are and , both nonzero, so both curves are smooth at with tangent lines and , which are distinct; hence Transversal smooth curves meet with multiplicity one, Multiplicity one characterises smooth points with a unique tangent, and symmetrically at the conjugate point Intersection multiplicity dominates the product of multiplicities, with equality for separated tangent cones, Local intersection multiplicity of two plane curves. The two points are conjugate, with non-real coordinates, and are not -rational: at either point the ratio is non-real, since a real square cannot equal is a field, every element is uniquely , and every nonzero element has inverse , Ordered field.
Counterexample
The real intersection: by [F2] the sets and are disjoint, since has only the trivial real solution; hence the sum of multiplicities over -rational points is .
Over the two curves meet in exactly the two conjugate points , each with multiplicity one, so the multiplicity-weighted complex sum is .
The -rational count gives , while the degree identity requires ; the missing contributions are exactly the two conjugate non-rational points, so Bezout's identity cannot be read as a statement about -rational points when is not algebraically closed.
Line multiplicities at a cusp
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the cited local-length, smoothness or Bezout suppliers.
Let be the cuspidal cubic at the cusp , so with double tangent line . Then
and both values agree with the local lengths and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC The Axiom of Choice, an algebraically closed field , the curve with the affine chart , affine equation , the cusp , and .
The homogeneous equation is primitive and linear in over , so it is irreducible by Gauss lemma over a UFD, Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes. Its dehomogenisation is square-free, so is a plane projective curve; in the chart the point has and the lowest-degree part of is , so the tangent cone is the double line Plane projective curves and their components, Multiplicity of a plane curve at a point, Tangent cone and tangent lines at a point.
The local intersection multiplicity is the length of for a local equation of the second curve, and it is computed by Local intersection multiplicity of two plane curves. Simplicity: has -basis the classes of , and has -basis the classes of Each quotient is respectively or ; the descending-power flag has simple residue- factors, hence lengths three and two Composition series and length of a module, Finite local length exactly when no common local branch.
The point is a double point, so the product bound gives for every line through , with equality exactly when the tangent cones are separated; the tangent line shares its (double) tangent direction with the cusp, so there the value is at least Intersection multiplicity dominates the product of multiplicities, with equality for separated tangent cones.
Verification
The tangent line : the ideal equals in , so , the number of basis elements .
The transverse line : the ideal equals , so , the number of basis elements .
The values and are compatible with the product bound: both are at least , and the tangent line carries the strict inequality because the two tangent cones share the line , while the line is transverse to the cusp and realises equality.
Lines through a node and its two branches
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the cited local-length, smoothness or Bezout suppliers.
Let be the nodal cubic over an algebraically closed field of characteristic not two, with node . The tangent cone is , so there are two distinct tangent lines . A line through equal to one of the two tangent lines meets with multiplicity three at ; a line through distinct from both tangents, for instance , has ; a line not through and not contained in meets in three points counted with multiplicity.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC The Axiom of Choice, an algebraically closed field of characteristic not two, the curve , the chart with affine equation , the node , and .
The homogeneous equation is primitive and linear in over , since and are coprime. It is therefore irreducible by Gauss lemma over a UFD, Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes, and is square-free, so is a plane projective curve of degree three; at the lowest part is , so and the tangent lines are and Plane projective curves and their components, Multiplicity of a plane curve at a point, Tangent cone and tangent lines at a point.
Local intersection multiplicities are lengths of local quotients, Local intersection multiplicity of two plane curves, Finite local length exactly when no common local branch, and the product bound gives on every line through , with equality exactly for separated tangent cones Intersection multiplicity dominates the product of multiplicities, with equality for separated tangent cones.
has -basis , and has -basis because is a unit of ; The descending-power flags in the quotients and have simple residue- factors, so lengths equal the number of these basis monomials Composition series and length of a module.
For a line with , Bezout applied to the cubic and the line of degree one gives Bezout's theorem for plane projective curves.
The two branches here are formal graph branches. In Formal power series over a commutative ring and the coefficient-extraction functional the coefficient operations form a ring Cauchy multiplication makes a commutative ring containing as the finitely supported subring, which is a domain For a field , is a domain and its nonunits form the unique maximal ideal . Construct with : the coefficient of degree is , so it uniquely determines because is invertible. Then in . Substitution gives the two graph branches , with distinct linear terms ; each factor gives the domain as quotient, and no other factor remains. This is a formal splitting, not a factorisation of the irreducible curve in the algebraic local ring.
Verification
Tangent line : substituting into gives , so up to a unit and . The other tangent line gives the same value by symmetry .
Non-tangent line through : substituting gives , and since is a unit at this is a unit multiple of , so , the value predicted by equality in the product bound.
A line with and : [F4] gives , so the contact points of the line with the cubic, counted with multiplicity, exhaust three.
The computations exhibit the two distinct tangent directions at the node, the contact of order three of each tangent line with the curve at the node, and the transverse value two for other lines through the node, with the global line total three for lines avoiding .
Bezout fails on the affine plane because points at infinity are missing
Statement refuted
False claim: for two plane curves of degrees , the number of affine intersection points counted with multiplicity equals .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC The Axiom of Choice, affine coordinates on with , , the affine lines and , and their projective closures , in .
and are square-free linear forms, so and are plane projective curves of degree one, with no common component; each is a line Plane projective curves and their components.
The affine parts of and are the parallel lines and , which are disjoint in ; hence the count of affine intersection points counted with multiplicity is : and cannot hold simultaneously since .
The projective closures meet in the point : solving and gives with , i.e. , a point at infinity of the affine chart ; in the chart the local ideal is , so its quotient is the residue field , of length one projective space points, Local intersection multiplicity of two plane curves.
Bezout for the two projective lines gives , realised at the single point at infinity Bezout's theorem for plane projective curves.
Counterexample
The affine zero sets and are disjoint, so the affine intersection count is .
The projective closures meet at with multiplicity one, and their total projective intersection, counted with multiplicity, is by Bezout.
Hence the affine count is strictly smaller than ; the missing contribution is exactly the point at infinity, so Bezout cannot be formulated on the affine plane without adding the points at infinity.
A line and a conic meet in two points counted with multiplicity
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the cited local-length, smoothness or Bezout suppliers.
Let over an algebraically closed field of characteristic not two and let . Then and ; both intersections are transversal, so at each point and the total is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC The Axiom of Choice, an algebraically closed field of characteristic not two, the conic , the line , and the parametrisation of .
Viewed in , the polynomial is primitive (its two nonzero coefficients are coprime) and linear, hence irreducible over and over by Gauss lemma over a UFD, Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes. Thus it is a square-free quadratic form, so is a plane projective curve of degree two with no linear component; is a line and Plane projective curves and their components.
Substituting the parametrisation into the defining form gives the binary quadratic ; its roots are and , corresponding to and , and both roots are simple Intersection with a line is the order of vanishing of the restricted equation.
At each of the two points the gradients of and of are nonzero with distinct tangent directions, so the curves meet transversally and ; the line-intersection count confirms the total Transversal smooth curves meet with multiplicity one, A line meets a degree-d curve in d points counted with multiplicity, Local intersection multiplicity of two plane curves.
Verification
The restrictions: substituting gives , so the intersection points of with are exactly and .
At the gradient of the conic is and at it is , both nonzero, while is a line with constant gradient ; the tangent lines are distinct at both points, so each local multiplicity is .
The two simple roots account for the full degree total , in agreement with the line-intersection count; there are exactly two distinct intersection points and both are transversal.
Two transverse cubics meet in nine points
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the cited local-length, smoothness or Bezout suppliers.
Let be algebraically closed of characteristic not three and let and . Then consists exactly of the nine points with one coordinate zero and the other two coordinates satisfying ; at each of them and are smooth with distinct tangent lines, so every local multiplicity is one and , as Bezout requires. The cusp and node computations on this page illustrate higher local multiplicities at singular contacts; this configuration has nine distinct contacts of multiplicity one.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC The Axiom of Choice, an algebraically closed field of characteristic not three, the Fermat cubic and the triangle .
A repeated irreducible factor of the Fermat form would divide all three derivatives , which have no common nonconstant factor because . Thus it is square-free; the triangle is a product of three distinct prime linear factors. None of those factors divides the Fermat form (setting each coordinate to zero leaves a nonzero binary cubic), so the two degree-three forms have no common factor, so are plane projective curves of degree three with no common component Plane projective curves and their components. In particular their intersection is nonempty and finite Two plane projective curves meet, Curves without a common component meet finitely often, and Bezout gives Bezout's theorem for plane projective curves.
A point lies on exactly when one of its coordinates vanishes. If, say, , then the cubic equation reads with , so with ; over the algebraically closed field and in characteristic not three the ratio solves , which splits over A field is algebraically closed exactly when every nonconstant polynomial splits, equivalently when it has no nontrivial finite extension. No root is repeated: a repeated root would annul the derivative , whereas every root is nonzero and . Thus the ratio takes three distinct values, so this coordinate line contributes three points, and the same holds for the other two coordinate lines; their intersection subsets with are disjoint, because the pairwise intersections of the coordinate lines are the coordinate vertices and no such vertex satisfies the cubic equation, giving exactly nine points Evaluation and roots of a polynomial in a commutative target ring.
At each intersection point is smooth: not all of vanish for a nonzero point, and the characteristic is not three. At a point with exactly one vanishing coordinate is also smooth, with tangent line the corresponding coordinate line, and the tangent line of there is not that coordinate line. Hence the two curves meet transversally at each of the nine points and every local multiplicity equals one Transversal smooth curves meet with multiplicity one, Local intersection multiplicity of two plane curves.
Verification
The intersection set: as computed in [F2], each of the three coordinate lines contains exactly three points of , and there are no other points of ; hence has exactly nine points.
At each of these nine points both curves are smooth with distinct tangent lines by [F3], so the local multiplicity is one at every intersection point.
Summing the nine unit multiplicities gives , in agreement with the Bezout count of [F1]; since the total equals the number of distinct points, all multiplicities are one, as asserted.
A tangent line meets a conic with multiplicity two at one point
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the cited local-length, smoothness or Bezout suppliers.
Over an algebraically closed field of characteristic not two, let and let be the tangent line to at . Then as a set, and substituting leaves the restriction with a double root at , so and the single point accounts for the full degree-two total.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC The Axiom of Choice, an algebraically closed field of characteristic not two, the conic , the line , and the point .
The quadratic is primitive and linear in over , so Gauss lemma makes it irreducible and square-free Gauss lemma over a UFD, Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes. Therefore is a plane projective curve of degree two and a line with ; because and Plane projective curves and their components.
The gradient of at is , nonzero, and the tangent line it defines is , i.e. ; so is the tangent line of the conic at Multiplicity one characterises smooth points with a unique tangent, Tangent cone and tangent lines at a point.
Restricting the defining form to : every point of has , and the restriction is the binary form in the coordinates , with a double root at , the point . By the order-of-vanishing formula equals that root multiplicity Intersection with a line is the order of vanishing of the restricted equation, Local intersection multiplicity of two plane curves.
The line-intersection count for the degree-two conic and the degree-one line gives A line meets a degree-d curve in d points counted with multiplicity.
Verification
The set is exactly : on the equation becomes , so and the point is .
Since the restriction has a double root at , the order of vanishing is two, so by [F3]; the value is consistent with the total of [F4], the line being tangent at its unique intersection point.
The single point with multiplicity two accounts for the full degree total , so tangency is exactly the phenomenon that distinct-point counting misses.
Counting distinct points is not enough: tangent contact
Statement refuted
False claim: for two plane projective curves of degrees over an algebraically closed field, the number of distinct intersection points equals .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC The Axiom of Choice, the conic and its tangent line at , both over an algebraically closed field of characteristic not two.
as a set, and : the restriction of the conic equation to is , a double root at A tangent line meets a conic with multiplicity two at one point.
Bezout for , gives over an algebraically closed field Bezout's theorem for plane projective curves, and every local multiplicity at a point of the intersection is a positive integer Local intersection multiplicity of two plane curves.
Counterexample
The distinct intersection points number one, while the degree product is .
The multiplicity-weighted sum is , the value required by Bezout, concentrated at the unique point.
Therefore the distinct-point count differs from ; the deficiency is repaired exactly by counting the tangent contact with multiplicity two, so the number of distinct points alone does not equal the degree product.
A flex of a cubic has contact order three
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the cited local-length, smoothness or Bezout suppliers.
For the Fermat cubic over an algebraically closed field of characteristic not three, the point is a flex. Its tangent line is : substituting into the equation gives , so the restriction to has a triple root at and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC The Axiom of Choice, an algebraically closed field of characteristic not three, the Fermat cubic with , the point , and the line .
If had a repeated irreducible factor, it would divide all of , impossible since and these polynomials have no common nonconstant divisor. Thus is square-free of degree three, and because ; the gradient of at is , nonzero since the characteristic is not three, so is a smooth point Plane projective curves and their components, Multiplicity one characterises smooth points with a unique tangent.
The tangent line at the smooth point is computed from the gradient: , i.e. , so Tangent cone and tangent lines at a point, Multiplicity one characterises smooth points with a unique tangent.
For a smooth point whose tangent line is not a component of , , the order of vanishing of the nonzero restricted form, and is a flex exactly when that order is at least three; an ordinary flex is the case of order exactly three Flexes are contacts of order at least three with the tangent line, Intersection with a smooth curve is a vanishing order.
Verification
The restriction to : parametrise by ; then restricts to , a binary cubic in whose only root is , the point , with multiplicity three.
Since the restriction in step 1.1 is nonzero, is not a component of . By [F3] the vanishing order three of the restriction is exactly the intersection multiplicity , so is a flex, and it is an ordinary flex.
The example exhibits a smooth cubic point where the tangent line meets the curve with contact order three; this realises the flex criterion concretely in homogeneous coordinates.