How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Intersection with a smooth curve is a vanishing order
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a plane projective curve smooth at , and let be a plane projective curve whose local equation at does not vanish identically on (no common local component through ). Then
the valuation of the image of in the discrete valuation ring .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a plane projective curve smooth at , a plane projective curve with local equation at whose restriction is nonzero, and a local equation of at .
The local ring is a discrete valuation ring with valuation , and the class of in it is the restriction Uniformising parameters at smooth points of a plane curve, Discrete valuation rings, Uniformising parameters.
Length is unchanged on passing to the quotient by the equation of the curve, because an -module has exactly the same submodules over and over : by localisation commuting with quotients Localisation commutes with quotient rings: , so Local intersection multiplicity of two plane curves.
In a discrete valuation ring with uniformiser , a nonzero element with a unit has ; a nonzero element of the DVR is a nonzerodivisor, so the quotient is a finite-length module exactly of this length Every nonzero fraction is a unit times a power of a uniformiser, Length and valuation in a DVR, Composition series and length of a module.
Since does not vanish identically on , its class in the DVR is nonzero, so the finiteness hypothesis of the definition is satisfied and [F3] applies Finite local length exactly when no common local branch.
Proof
The ring is a discrete valuation ring by [F1], and the restriction is its nonzero element. The quotient identification of [F2] gives with .
In the discrete valuation ring with uniformiser and valuation , the element has the normal form with a unit, and the length of equals .
Combining steps 1.1 and 1.2, ; and by the convention of the definition the value is exactly when is a unit, i.e. when . This proves the displayed equality.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Composition series and length of a module
- Discrete valuation rings
- Local intersection multiplicity of two plane curves
- Uniformising parameters at smooth points of a plane curve
- Uniformising parameters
- Finite local length exactly when no common local branch
- Every nonzero fraction is a unit times a power of a uniformiser
- Length and valuation in a DVR
- Localisation commutes with quotient rings: $S^{-1}R/S^{-1}I\cong \bar S^{-1}(R/I)$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
67 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- William Fulton, Algebraic Curves: An Introduction to Algebraic Geometry (2008 electronic edition; Internet Archive copy of the author's PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michael Artin, MIT 18.721 Notes for a Course in Algebraic Geometry (January 26, 2022 version), Chapter 1 (standard reference, not scraped)