How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For a field , is a domain and its nonunits form the unique maximal ideal
Statement
If is a field, then is an integral domain. Its set of nonunits is exactly
which is the unique maximal ideal of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and notation of the statement above.
A field has , commutative multiplication, and an inverse for every nonzero element (Field).
Over an integral domain, formal order is additive on products with the convention, and the power-series ring is an integral domain (Formal order is non-Archimedean under sums and additive under products over a domain).
A formal power series is a unit exactly when its constant coefficient is a unit (A formal power series is a unit exactly when its constant coefficient is a unit).
Multiplication by shifts coefficients: for and is for (Coefficient extraction is -linear, separates formal series, shifts under multiplication by , and converts products to finite convolution).
A maximal ideal is a proper ideal with no proper ideal strictly between it and the whole ring (Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring).
Proof
A field is a nonzero integral domain, so exact order additivity shows that a product of two nonzero series is nonzero. Thus is a domain.
The unit criterion says that a series is a nonunit exactly when its constant coefficient is . The shift formula says these are exactly the multiples of : for such , define by and obtain . This set is a proper ideal because has constant coefficient .
If an ideal strictly contains , it contains a series with nonzero constant coefficient, hence a unit, and therefore is the whole ring. Thus is maximal. Conversely, every proper ideal contains no unit, so every maximal ideal is contained in the set of nonunits and hence equals it by maximality.
Steps 1.1-2.1 prove the domain claim and identify the unique maximal ideal, including the zero series and constant-series cases.
Depends on
- Formal order is non-Archimedean under sums and additive under products over a domain
- A formal power series is a unit exactly when its constant coefficient is a unit
- Coefficient extraction is $R$-linear, separates formal series, shifts under multiplication by $x^k$, and converts products to finite convolution
- Field
- Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 28 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Benjamin Sambale, An Invitation to Formal Power Series (standard reference, not scraped)