How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Coefficient fields need not be unique
Example
Let be a field and let be transcendental over . In the complete local ring the obvious coefficient field is not the only one: the translated field is a different coefficient field with the same residue image.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The complete local ring .
A formal power-series ring over a field is a local domain with maximal ideal generated by the indeterminate (For a field , is a domain and its nonunits form the unique maximal ideal ).
Complete equicharacteristic local rings have coefficient fields (Complete equicharacteristic local rings have coefficient fields).
Verification
By [L1], is local with maximal ideal and residue field . The standard inclusion of into is therefore a coefficient field, in line with [L2].
Consider the subfield . For every nonzero polynomial , the residue of modulo is , which is nonzero in . Hence is a unit of , so every rational function in lies in and is indeed a subfield. Its residue image is again because .
The two coefficient fields are distinct: if lay in the constant field , then subtracting would place in , but every nonzero element of is a unit in whereas lies in the maximal ideal. Thus .
Therefore coefficient fields in a complete equicharacteristic local ring need not be canonical.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Melvin Hochster, The structure theory of complete local rings (standard reference, not scraped)