Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Coefficient extraction is R-linear, separates formal series, shifts under multiplication by xk, and converts products to finite convolution

Statement

Let R be a commutative ring, f,g∈R⟦x⟧, r∈R, and n,k∈N. Then

[xn](f+g)=[xn]f+[xn]g,[xn](rf)=r[xn]f,

and f=g if and only if [xn]f=[xn]g for every n. Moreover,

[xn](xkf)={[xn−k]f,k≤n,0,k>n,

and

[xn](fg)=∑i=0n[xi]f[xn−i]g.

These formulas include n=0, k=0, and k>n.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses and notation of the statement above.

[F1]

For f=∑anxn, coefficient extraction is evaluation: [xn]f=an (Formal power series over a commutative ring and the coefficient-extraction functional [xn]).

[F2]

The series x is supported at degree 1, and xn is supported at degree n (Formal power series over a commutative ring and the coefficient-extraction functional [xn]).

[F3]

Cauchy multiplication is the finite convolution [xn](fg)=∑i=0n[xi]f[xn−i]g (Formal power series over a commutative ring and the coefficient-extraction functional [xn]).

Proof

technique · unfold the definitions
1.1

The two linearity identities are the pointwise definitions of addition and scalar multiplication. Equality of all extracted coefficients is equality of the underlying functions N→R, proving both directions of extensionality.

givenF1
1.2

In the convolution for xkf, the first factor has one nonzero coefficient, at k. It contributes [xn−k]f when k≤n and there is no contributing index when k>n; for k=0 this says 1f=f.

givenF2
1.3

The last display is the defining finite convolution, whose n=0 instance is [x0](fg)=[x0]f[x0]g.

givenF3
2.1

Steps 1.1-1.3 establish every asserted clause and every listed boundary case.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources