Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

C(x)=1+xC(x)2

Statement

In Qx the Catalan generating function (The Catalan generating function C(x)=n0Cnxn in Qx) satisfies

C=1+xC2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Catalan generating function CQx.

[F1]

For every n0, [xn]C=Cn, and a natural number written where a rational is expected denotes its image under an injective embedding preserving addition, multiplication and finite sums (The Catalan generating function C(x)=n0Cnxn in Qx).

[L1]

Cn+1=i=0nCiCni in N for every nN (Cn+1=i=0nCiCni, with C0=1).

[L2]

[xn](f+g)=[xn]f+[xn]g; f=g if and only if [xn]f=[xn]g for every n; [xn](xkf)=[xnk]f for kn and 0 for k>n; and [xn](fg)=i=0n[xi]f[xni]g (Coefficient extraction is R-linear, separates formal series, shifts under multiplication by xk, and converts products to finite convolution).

[L3]

The coefficientwise sum and Cauchy product make Qx a commutative ring, and the constant series form an isomorphic copy of Q inside it (Cauchy multiplication makes Rx a commutative ring containing R[x] as the finitely supported subring).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The constant coefficients agree: [x0](1+xC2)=[x0]1+[x0](xC2)=1+0=1, the second term vanishing by the clause of [L2] for k=1>0, and [x0]C=C0=1 by [F1] and [F2].

F1F2L2L3
1.2

The coefficients at every positive index agree. Let nN. Then [xn+1](1+xC2)=[xn+1](xC2)=[xn](C2) by [L2], and the Cauchy product clause of [L2] evaluates [xn](C2) as i=0nCiCni, which is Cn+1 by [L1], read in Q through the embedding of [F1]. And [xn+1]C=Cn+1.

F1L1L2L3
2.1

The two series have the same coefficient at every index by steps 1.1 and 1.2, so they are equal by the extensionality clause of [L2].

L2step 1.1step 1.2

Remarks

  • This is the recurrence, transcribed. The equation carries exactly the content of the convolution recurrence together with the initial value C0=1; the passage between the two is the Cauchy product formula and nothing else. What the equation buys is that it can be solved, which a recurrence cannot be.

  • No division occurs. The equation is stated in the cleared form C=1+xC2. Solving it below produces the closed form by identifying a square root, not by dividing by 2x, which is not a unit of Qx.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources