Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

[xk](14x)1/2=2k(2k2k1) for k1, and 1 for k=0

Statement

Work in Qx, a commutative Q-algebra (The Catalan generating function C(x)=n0Cnxn in Qx), and let (14x)1/2 denote the formal binomial power (1+u)c of Formal exponential, logarithm, and binomial powers over a commutative Q-algebra with u=4x and c=1/2; by Every 1+u with uxRx has a unique kth root with constant coefficient 1 in a commutative Q-algebra it is the unique series in 1+xQx whose square is 14x. Then

[x0](14x)1/2=1,

and for every k1, in Q,

k[xk](14x)1/2=2(2k2k1),equivalently[xk](14x)1/2=2k(2k2k1).

The displayed quotient formula is stated for k1 only, and is not a statement about k=0: at k=0 the value is 1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the series (14x)1/2 above; write Ak:=[xk](14x)1/2.

[F1]

Qx is a commutative Q-algebra, and a natural number written where a rational is expected denotes its image under an injective embedding preserving addition and multiplication (The Catalan generating function C(x)=n0Cnxn in Qx).

[L1]

In a commutative Q-algebra, for uxRx and cR, (1+u)c=n0c(c1)(cn+1)n!un, where the numerator is the empty product 1 at n=0 (Formal exp and log are inverse homomorphisms and formal binomial powers obey the expected addition laws).

[L2]

For uxRx and cR, (1+u)c:=exp(clog(1+u)), and the displayed families are summable because ordx(un)n (Formal exponential, logarithm, and binomial powers over a commutative Q-algebra).

[L3]

For a commutative Q-algebra R, uxRx and k1, there is a unique v1+xRx with vk=1+u, namely v=(1+u)1/k (Every 1+u with uxRx has a unique kth root with constant coefficient 1 in a commutative Q-algebra).

[L4]

[xn](f+g)=[xn]f+[xn]g, [xn](rf)=r[xn]f, and [xn](xkf)=[xnk]f for kn and 0 for k>n (Coefficient extraction is R-linear, separates formal series, shifts under multiplication by xk, and converts products to finite convolution).

[L6]

(m0)=1 for every m, and (mj) is a natural number (The set [A]k of k-element subsets and the binomial coefficient (nk):=[n]k).

[L7]

m!0 for every mN, and σ(m)!=m!σ(m) (The factorial n! and the falling factorial nk, defined by recursion in N).

[L8]

For all x,y,cN with c0: if xc=yc then x=y (Cancellation for multiplication by a nonzero factor).

[L9]

Q is a field, so every nonzero rational is invertible (The rationals form a field).

[L10]

A property that holds at 0 and passes from every natural number to its successor holds at every natural number: if a property P satisfies P(0) and (P(n)P(σ(n))) for all n, then P(n) holds for all nN (The principle of mathematical induction).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

With u=4x we have un=(4)nxn, so by [L1] and [L4] the coefficient of the binomial series at the index k receives a contribution only from the term n=k, giving Ak=(1/2)(1/21)(1/2k+1)k!(4)k for every kN; at k=0 the numerator is the empty product and A0=1. Consequently (k+1)Ak+1=(1/2k)(4)Ak=2(2k1)Ak for every kN.

F1L1L2L4
1.2

For every k1 the identity k(2kk)=2(2k1)(2k2k1) holds in N. Both k2k and k12k2, so [L5] gives (2kk)k!k!=(2k)! and (2k2k1)(k1)!(k1)!=(2k2)!. Multiplying the first by k and using (2k)!=(2k)(2k1)(2k2)! from [L7] gives k(2kk)k!k!=2k2(2k1)(2k2)!; multiplying the second by 2(2k1)k2 and using k!=k(k1)! gives 2(2k1)(2k2k1)k!k!=2(2k1)k2(2k2)!. The two right-hand sides agree, so cancelling the nonzero factor k!k! by [L7] and [L8] gives the identity.

L5L7L8
2.1

For every k1 one has kAk=2(2k2k1), by induction on k. At k=1 the formula of step 1.1 gives A1=1/21(4)=2, and 2(00)=2 by [L6]. Assume it at some k1. Multiplying the recursion of step 1.1 by k gives k(k+1)Ak+1=2(2k1)kAk=4(2k1)(2k2k1), which by step 1.2 is 2k(2kk); since k is a nonzero rational, [L9] allows cancelling it and yields (k+1)Ak+1=2(2kk), which is the formula at k+1.

L6L9L10step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

Dividing by the nonzero rational k turns step 2.1 into the quotient form, and step 1.1 gives the value at k=0. As a check, the first coefficients are A0=1, A1=2, A2=22(21)=2, A3=23(42)=4, A4=24(63)=10 and A5=25(84)=28.

L3L9step 1.1step 2.1

Remarks

  • The index k=0 is genuinely outside the formula. The quotient 2k(2k2k1) has no value at k=0, and the coefficient there is 1, not 0. Stating the formula with its range is not pedantry: the closed form of the Catalan generating function takes coefficients at positive indices only, and a statement covering k=0 would be false.

  • Where the uniqueness clause is used. [L3] identifies the binomial power (14x)1/2 as the series in 1+xQx squaring to 14x, which is what lets a series produced by an entirely different computation be recognised as this one. No branch is chosen and no limit is taken.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources