Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

[xk](1−4x)1/2=−2k(2k−2k−1) for k≥1, and 1 for k=0

Statement

Work in Q⟦x⟧, a commutative Q-algebra (The Catalan generating function C(x)=∑n≥0Cnxn in Q⟦x⟧), and let (1−4x)1/2 denote the formal binomial power (1+u)c of Formal exponential, logarithm, and binomial powers over a commutative Q-algebra with u=−4x and c=1/2; by Every 1+u with u∈xR⟦x⟧ has a unique kth root with constant coefficient 1 in a commutative Q-algebra it is the unique series in 1+xQ⟦x⟧ whose square is 1−4x. Then

[x0](1−4x)1/2=1,

and for every k≥1, in Q,

k [xk](1−4x)1/2=−2(2k−2k−1),equivalently[xk](1−4x)1/2=−2k(2k−2k−1).

The displayed quotient formula is stated for k≥1 only, and is not a statement about k=0: at k=0 the value is 1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the series (1−4x)1/2 above; write Ak:=[xk](1−4x)1/2.

[F1]

Q⟦x⟧ is a commutative Q-algebra, and a natural number written where a rational is expected denotes its image under an injective embedding preserving addition and multiplication (The Catalan generating function C(x)=∑n≥0Cnxn in Q⟦x⟧).

[L1]

In a commutative Q-algebra, for u∈xR⟦x⟧ and c∈R, (1+u)c=∑n≥0c(c−1)⋯(c−n+1)n!un, where the numerator is the empty product 1 at n=0 (Formal exp⁡ and log⁡ are inverse homomorphisms and formal binomial powers obey the expected addition laws).

[L2]

For u∈xR⟦x⟧ and c∈R, (1+u)c:=exp⁡(clog⁡(1+u)), and the displayed families are summable because ord⁡x(un)≥n (Formal exponential, logarithm, and binomial powers over a commutative Q-algebra).

[L3]

For a commutative Q-algebra R, u∈xR⟦x⟧ and k′≥1, there is a unique v∈1+xR⟦x⟧ with vk′=1+u, namely v=(1+u)1/k′ (Every 1+u with u∈xR⟦x⟧ has a unique kth root with constant coefficient 1 in a commutative Q-algebra).

[L4]

[xn](f+g)=[xn]f+[xn]g, [xn](rf)=r[xn]f, and [xn](xkf)=[xn−k]f for k≤n and 0 for k>n (Coefficient extraction is R-linear, separates formal series, shifts under multiplication by xk, and converts products to finite convolution).

[L6]

(m0)=1 for every m, and (mj) is a natural number (The set [A]k of k-element subsets and the binomial coefficient (nk):=∣[n]k∣).

[L7]

m!≠0 for every m∈N, and σ(m)!=m!⋅σ(m) (The factorial n! and the falling factorial nk‾, defined by recursion in N).

[L8]

For all x′,y′,c′∈N with c′≠0: if x′⋅c′=y′⋅c′ then x′=y′ (Cancellation for multiplication by a nonzero factor).

[L9]

Q is a field, so every nonzero rational is invertible (The rationals form a field).

[L10]

A property that holds at 0 and passes from every natural number to its successor holds at every natural number: if a property P satisfies P(0) and (P(n)⇒P(σ(n))) for all n, then P(n) holds for all n∈N (The principle of mathematical induction).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1L1L2L4

With u=−4x we have un=(−4)nxn, so by [L1] and [L4] the coefficient of the binomial series at the index k receives a contribution only from the term n=k, giving Ak=(1/2)(1/2−1)⋯(1/2−k+1)k!(−4)k for every k∈N; at k=0 the numerator is the empty product and A0=1. Consequently (k+1)Ak+1=(1/2−k)(−4) Ak=2(2k−1)Ak for every k∈N.

1.2L5L7L8

For every k≥1 the identity k(2kk)=2(2k−1)(2k−2k−1) holds in N. Both k≤2k and k−1≤2k−2, so [L5] gives (2kk)k! k!=(2k)! and (2k−2k−1)(k−1)! (k−1)!=(2k−2)!. Multiplying the first by k and using (2k)!=(2k)(2k−1)(2k−2)! from [L7] gives k(2kk)k! k!=2k2(2k−1)(2k−2)!; multiplying the second by 2(2k−1)k2 and using k!=k (k−1)! gives 2(2k−1)(2k−2k−1)k! k!=2(2k−1)k2(2k−2)!. The two right-hand sides agree, so cancelling the nonzero factor k! k! by [L7] and [L8] gives the identity.

2.1L6L9L10step 1.1step 1.2

For every k≥1 one has k Ak=−2(2k−2k−1), by induction on k. At k=1 the formula of step 1.1 gives A1=1/21(−4)=−2, and −2(00)=−2 by [L6]. Assume it at some k≥1. Multiplying the recursion of step 1.1 by k gives k(k+1)Ak+1=2(2k−1) k Ak=−4(2k−1)(2k−2k−1), which by step 1.2 is −2k(2kk); since k is a nonzero rational, [L9] allows cancelling it and yields (k+1)Ak+1=−2(2kk), which is the formula at k+1.

3.1L3L9step 1.1step 2.1∎

Dividing by the nonzero rational k turns step 2.1 into the quotient form, and step 1.1 gives the value at k=0. As a check, the first coefficients are A0=1, A1=−2, A2=−22(21)=−2, A3=−23(42)=−4, A4=−24(63)=−10 and A5=−25(84)=−28.

Remarks

  • The index k=0 is genuinely outside the formula. The quotient −2k(2k−2k−1) has no value at k=0, and the coefficient there is 1, not 0. Stating the formula with its range is not pedantry: the closed form of the Catalan generating function takes coefficients at positive indices only, and a statement covering k=0 would be false.

  • Where the uniqueness clause is used. [L3] identifies the binomial power (1−4x)1/2 as the series in 1+xQ⟦x⟧ squaring to 1−4x, which is what lets a series produced by an entirely different computation be recognised as this one. No branch is chosen and no limit is taken.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources