Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Formal exp and log are inverse homomorphisms and formal binomial powers obey the expected addition laws

Statement

In a commutative Q-algebra R, for u,vxRx and c,dR,

exp(u+v)=exp(u)exp(v),

log((1+u)(1+v))=log(1+u)+log(1+v),

and exp:xRx1+xRx and log:1+xRxxRx are inverse group homomorphisms. Consequently,

(1+u)c+d=(1+u)c(1+u)d,((1+u)c)d=(1+u)cd,

and

(1+u)c=n0c(c1)(cn+1)n!un,

where the numerator is the empty product 1 at n=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses and notation of the statement above.

[F1]

Formal exponential and logarithm are exp(u)=n0un/n! and log(1+u)=n1(1)n1un/n (Formal exponential, logarithm, and binomial powers over a commutative Q-algebra).

[F2]

Formal binomial powers are defined by (1+u)c=exp(clog(1+u)) (Formal exponential, logarithm, and binomial powers over a commutative Q-algebra).

[F3]

The formal derivative is additive, obeys the product rule, and satisfies D(fm)=mfm1Df for m1 while D(1)=0 (Formal differentiation is linear and satisfies product, power, quotient, chain, and coefficient-recovery laws).

[F4]

A summable family may be bijectively reindexed or partitioned and regrouped without changing its sum (Summable formal families may be regrouped and rearranged, distribute over multiplication, and have well-defined locally finite products).

Proof

technique · finite coefficient convolution and formal differentiation
1.1

Expanding the product and regrouping in each degree gives exp(u)exp(v)=n0(u+v)n/n! by the finite binomial identity, so the exponential addition law holds.

givenF1F4
1.2

Termwise differentiation gives Dexp(u)=(expu)Du and Dlog(1+u)=(1+u)1Du. Hence D(log(expu)u)=0, and its constant coefficient is 0, so log(expu)=u. For z=1+u and y=exp(logz), the same formulas give D(yz1)=0 and (yz1)(0)=1, so y=z. Here a zero derivative forces every positive-degree coefficient to vanish because every positive integer is invertible in a Q-algebra.

givenF1F3
1.3

In an independent indeterminate z, let Bc(z) denote the displayed generalized-binomial series. Direct coefficient algebra gives Bc(0)=1 and (1+z)DzBc(z)=cBc(z). The formally defined (1+z)c has the same constant coefficient and differential equation. Recursively comparing coefficients, where n is invertible for n1, makes the two series equal; admissible substitution z=u gives the asserted formula.

givenF2F3
2.1

Step 1.2 and the exponential addition law give exp(log(1+u)+log(1+v))=(1+u)(1+v); applying log gives the logarithm addition law. The two power laws follow by substituting their definition and applying the exponential and logarithm laws.

step 1.1step 1.2givenF2
3.1

Steps 1.1-2.1 prove the inverse homomorphisms, both power laws, and the coefficient formula, including u=0, c=0, and n=0.

step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 1.3

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 40 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources