How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A tangent line meets a conic with multiplicity two at one point
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the cited local-length, smoothness or Bezout suppliers.
Over an algebraically closed field of characteristic not two, let and let be the tangent line to at . Then as a set, and substituting leaves the restriction with a double root at , so and the single point accounts for the full degree-two total.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC The Axiom of Choice, an algebraically closed field of characteristic not two, the conic , the line , and the point .
The quadratic is primitive and linear in over , so Gauss lemma makes it irreducible and square-free Gauss lemma over a UFD, Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes. Therefore is a plane projective curve of degree two and a line with ; because and Plane projective curves and their components.
The gradient of at is , nonzero, and the tangent line it defines is , i.e. ; so is the tangent line of the conic at Multiplicity one characterises smooth points with a unique tangent, Tangent cone and tangent lines at a point.
Restricting the defining form to : every point of has , and the restriction is the binary form in the coordinates , with a double root at , the point . By the order-of-vanishing formula equals that root multiplicity Intersection with a line is the order of vanishing of the restricted equation, Local intersection multiplicity of two plane curves.
The line-intersection count for the degree-two conic and the degree-one line gives A line meets a degree-d curve in d points counted with multiplicity.
Verification
The set is exactly : on the equation becomes , so and the point is .
Since the restriction has a double root at , the order of vanishing is two, so by [F3]; the value is consistent with the total of [F4], the line being tangent at its unique intersection point.
The single point with multiplicity two accounts for the full degree total , so tangency is exactly the phenomenon that distinct-point counting misses.
Depends on
- A line meets a degree-d curve in d points counted with multiplicity
- The Axiom of Choice
- Flexes and bitangents defined by intersection multiplicity
- Local intersection multiplicity of two plane curves
- Plane projective curves and their components
- Tangent cone and tangent lines at a point
- Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes
- Gauss lemma over a UFD
- Intersection with a line is the order of vanishing of the restricted equation
- Multiplicity one characterises smooth points with a unique tangent
Used by
- Counting distinct points is not enough: tangent contact Counterexample
Dependency tree · two levels
75 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- William Fulton, Algebraic Curves: An Introduction to Algebraic Geometry (2008 electronic edition; Internet Archive copy of the author's PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michael Artin, MIT 18.721 Notes for a Course in Algebraic Geometry (January 26, 2022 version), Chapter 1 (standard reference, not scraped)