Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A common component makes the intersection sum infinite

Statement refuted

False claim: Bezout's identity ∑pIp(C,D)=de holds for all pairs of plane curves, without the hypothesis that the curves have no common component.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC The Axiom of Choice, the algebraically closed field k, the plane projective curves C=V(x0) of degree one and D=V(x0x1) of degree two, and an arbitrary point p of the shared line. In a chart xi=1 containing p (where i=1 or 2), write f=x0/xi and g=(x0/xi)(x1/xi) for the local equations.

[F1]

x0 and x0x1 are nonconstant square-free forms, so C and D are plane projective curves; V(x0) is an irreducible component of both, so C and D share the component V(x0) Plane projective curves and their components.

[F2]

At p∈V(x0) the local ideal is (f,g)=(x0/xi), whose nonunit irreducible generator is a local coordinate vanishing on the line; hence O/(f,g) is not of finite length and the definition records Ip(C,D)=∞ Local intersection multiplicity of two plane curves, Finite local length exactly when no common local branch, Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring.

[F3]

The Bezout theorem is stated under the no-common-component hypothesis; it computes a finite sum of finite multiplicities Bezout's theorem for plane projective curves. A module of infinite length is not a finite summand Composition series and length of a module.

Counterexample

1.1F1given

The curves C and D share the line V(x0), by [F1], and at every point p of that line the local ideal is generated by the common irreducible factor x0/xi.

1.2F2given

At such a point the quotient O/(x0/xi) is the local ring of the line, of infinite length as an O-module, so Ip(C,D)=∞ by [F2]; in particular the local multiplicities do not form a finite sum.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2F3∎

The line has infinitely many points, already the points [0:1:b] for b∈k with k infinite by Plane projective curves and their components (Remarks). Since the sum ∑pIp(C,D) contains infinitely many infinite terms, it is not the finite number de=2: the hypothesis of no common component cannot be dropped from the Bezout identity, whose statements are those of [F3].

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

72 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources