Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Lines through a node and its two branches

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the cited local-length, smoothness or Bezout suppliers.

Let C=V(y2z−x2(x+z))⊆P2 be the nodal cubic over an algebraically closed field of characteristic not two, with node p=[0:0:1]. The tangent cone is y2−x2, so there are two distinct tangent lines y=±x. A line through p equal to one of the two tangent lines meets C with multiplicity three at p; a line through p distinct from both tangents, for instance V(y), has Ip(C,L)=2; a line not through p and not contained in C meets C in three points counted with multiplicity.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC The Axiom of Choice, an algebraically closed field k of characteristic not two, the curve C=V(y2z−x2(x+z)), the chart z=1 with affine equation f=y2−x2(x+1)=y2−x2−x3, the node p=(0,0), and O=k[x,y](x,y).

[F1]

The homogeneous equation (y2−x2)z−x3 is primitive and linear in z over k[x,y], since y2−x2 and x3 are coprime. It is therefore irreducible by Gauss lemma over a UFD, Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes, and f is square-free, so C is a plane projective curve of degree three; at p the lowest part is y2−x2=(y−x)(y+x), so mp(C)=2 and the tangent lines are V(y−x) and V(y+x) Plane projective curves and their components, Multiplicity of a plane curve at a point, Tangent cone and tangent lines at a point.

[F2]

Local intersection multiplicities are lengths of local quotients, Ip(C,L)=ℓO(O/(f,ℓ)) Local intersection multiplicity of two plane curves, Finite local length exactly when no common local branch, and the product bound gives Ip≥2 on every line through p, with equality exactly for separated tangent cones Intersection multiplicity dominates the product of multiplicities, with equality for separated tangent cones.

[F3]

O/(y−x,x3) has k-basis 1,x,x2, and O/(y,x2+x3)=O/(y,x2(1+x)) has k-basis 1,x because 1+x is a unit of O; The descending-power flags in the quotients k[x](x)/(x3) and k[x](x)/(x2) have simple residue-k factors, so lengths equal the number of these basis monomials Composition series and length of a module.

[F4]

For a line L with L⊈C, Bezout applied to the cubic C and the line of degree one gives ∑q∈L∩CIq(C,L)=3 Bezout's theorem for plane projective curves.

[F5]

The two branches here are formal graph branches. In k⟦x⟧ Formal power series over a commutative ring and the coefficient-extraction functional [xn] the coefficient operations form a ring Cauchy multiplication makes R⟦x⟧ a commutative ring containing R[x] as the finitely supported subring, which is a domain For a field K, K⟦x⟧ is a domain and its nonunits form the unique maximal ideal xK⟦x⟧. Construct s(x)=1+∑r≥1srxr with s(x)2=1+x: the coefficient of degree r is 2sr+∑i=1r−1sisr−i, so it uniquely determines sr because 2 is invertible. Then f=(y−xs(x))(y+xs(x)) in k⟦x⟧[y]. Substitution gives the two graph branches y=±xs(x), with distinct linear terms ±x; each factor gives the domain k⟦x⟧ as quotient, and no other factor remains. This is a formal splitting, not a factorisation of the irreducible curve in the algebraic local ring.

Verification

1.1F1F2F3algebra

Tangent line V(y−x): substituting y=x into f gives x2−x2−x3=−x3, so (f,y−x)=(y−x,x3) up to a unit and Ip(C,V(y−x))=ℓO(O/(y−x,x3))=3. The other tangent line gives the same value by symmetry y↦−y.

1.2F1F2F3algebra

Non-tangent line V(y) through p: substituting y=0 gives −x2(1+x), and since 1+x is a unit at p this is a unit multiple of x2, so Ip(C,V(y))=ℓO(O/(y,x2))=2, the value predicted by equality in the product bound.

1.3F1F4given

A line L with p∉L and L⊈C: [F4] gives ∑q∈L∩CIq(C,L)=3, so the contact points of the line with the cubic, counted with multiplicity, exhaust three.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3F1F2F5∎

The computations exhibit the two distinct tangent directions at the node, the contact of order three of each tangent line with the curve at the node, and the transverse value two for other lines through the node, with the global line total three for lines avoiding p.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

108 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources