Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Intersection multiplicity dominates the product of multiplicities, with equality for separated tangent cones

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let C=V(F) and D=V(G) be plane projective curves over the algebraically closed field k, let p∈C∩D be a point at which C and D have no common local component, and put m=mp(C), n=mp(D). Then Ip(C,D)≥mn, with equality if and only if C and D have no common tangent line at p, that is, the tangent cones of C and D at p share no line.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, plane curves C=V(F), D=V(G) over the algebraically closed field k, a point p with no common local component, local equations f,g at p, and m=mp(C), n=mp(D).

[F1]

In the local ring O=OP2,p with maximal ideal m, the orders of f,g are m,n, and (f,g)O is m-primary: some power mN lies in (f,g)O Finite local length exactly when no common local branch, Multiplicity of a plane curve at a point, A local ring is a nonzero commutative ring with a unique maximal ideal.

[F2]

Choose centred chart coordinates x,y and the polynomial dehomogenisations f,g, so O=k[x,y](x,y). Write R=k[x,y] with I=(x,y) and J=Im+n+(f,g). Then V(J)={0}; hence J is I-primary, R/J≅O/JO, and dim⁡k(R/J)=dim⁡k(O/JO): passing to the quotient by an I-primary ideal makes R/J a local ring with maximal ideal I/J, so its localisation at I is an isomorphism The radical of an ideal, Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals, Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a local ring R is canonically isomorphic to Rm at its maximal ideal, Localisation commutes with quotient rings: S−1R/S−1I≅Sˉ−1(R/I). The finite-length local quotients here have k-dimension equal to their O-length by the finite maximal-ideal filtration in Finite local length exactly when no common local branch (Proof 1.3). Since J⊇(f,g), the quotient O/JO is a quotient of O/(f,g), so dim⁡k(O/JO)≤Ip(C,D) with equality if and only if Im+n⊆(f,g)O Local intersection multiplicity of two plane curves.

[F3]

The truncated multiplication map ψˉ:R/In×R/Im→R/Im+n, ψˉ(A,B)=Af+Bg, is well defined and k-linear, its image is exactly the kernel of the natural map ϕ:R/Im+n→R/(Im+n,f,g), and ψˉ is injective if and only if the lowest forms f∗,g∗ have no common factor The truncated multiplication map is injective exactly when the tangent cones are coprime. The dimension of R/It is (t+12), and dim⁡im⁡ψˉ=dim⁡(R/In)+dim⁡(R/Im)−dim⁡ker⁡ψˉ Lengths of truncated plane local rings, Rank-nullity: dim⁡FV=nullity⁡T+rank⁡T, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis, Vector space over a field.

[F4]

The tangent lines of C at p are the lines whose defining linear forms divide f∗; since k is algebraically closed, f∗,g∗ have a common factor if and only if they have a common linear factor Tangent cone and tangent lines at a point.

[F5]

AC is assumed; it enters through the Nullstellensatz, primarity and localisation suppliers The Axiom of Choice, Module length is additive in short exact sequences.

[F6]

If the lowest-degree forms f∗,g∗ are coprime then Im+n⊆(f,g)O, since It⊆(f,g)O for every t≥m+n−1 Coprime tangent cones force a power of the maximal ideal into the local ideal. The morphism O/(f,g)→O/JO is the quotient by the image of Im+n, so [F2] makes the equality Ip(C,D)=dim⁡k(R/J) hold whenever the initial forms are coprime. The containment may also hold for other initial forms; the equality Ip=mn additionally requires injectivity of the truncated syzygy map, as shown below.

Proof

1.1F3algebraF1

The linear map ϕ:R/Im+n→R/(Im+n,f,g) is surjective with kernel exactly im⁡ψˉ by [F3]; hence dim⁡k(R/Im+n)=dim⁡kim⁡ψˉ+dim⁡k(R/J) with J=Im+n+(f,g), i.e. dim⁡k(R/J)=(m+n+12)−dim⁡kim⁡ψˉ.

2.1step 1.1F2F3

Since dim⁡kim⁡ψˉ≤dim⁡k(R/In)+dim⁡k(R/Im)=(n+12)+(m+12), step 1.1 gives dim⁡k(R/J)≥(m+n+12)−(n+12)−(m+12)=mn, by direct expansion: (m+n)(m+n+1)−(n)(n+1)−(m)(m+1)2=mn; and by [F2] Ip(C,D)≥dim⁡k(R/J), so Ip(C,D)≥mn.

3.1step 2.1F3F4F6

Equality in step 2.1 requires both the equality Ip(C,D)=dim⁡k(R/J) of [F2], which holds exactly when Im+n⊆(f,g)O and is therefore available whenever the initial forms are coprime by [F6], and the maximality of dim⁡kim⁡ψˉ, i.e. injectivity of ψˉ. By [F3] injectivity happens exactly when the lowest-degree forms f∗ and g∗ have no common factor, which by [F4] (and algebraically closedness of k) is exactly when the tangent cones share no line.

3.2step 2.1F3

If f∗ and g∗ have a common factor, then by [F3] the kernel of ψˉ is nonzero, so the inequality dim⁡kim⁡ψˉ≤dim⁡k(R/In)+dim⁡k(R/Im) is strict and step 2.1 gives the strict bound Ip(C,D)>mn; hence equality in step 2.1 occurs precisely in the coprime case.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2F5F6∎

Therefore Ip(C,D)≥mn always, with equality precisely in the coprime-tangent-cone case: when the tangent cones are coprime both equalities hold by [F6] and [F3], and otherwise the second is strict by step 3.2.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

127 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources