Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Lengths of truncated plane local rings

Statement

Let k be a field, R=k[x,y], m=(x,y) and O=Rm. For every integer t≥0 the natural map R/mt→O/mtO is an isomorphism, and

ℓO(O/mtO)=dim⁡k(O/mtO)=(t+12)=t(t+1)2.

The ring O/mtO has a composition series whose factors are the one-dimensional k-vector spaces spanned by the monomials xiyj with i+j=t−1,t−2,…,0.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Every polynomial in R has a unique finite expansion ∑cijxiyj; total degree is the largest i+j with cij≠0 Monomials, coefficients, degree in each variable and total degree in F[x1,…,xn]. Evaluation at (0,0) is the map f↦f(0,0) and its kernel is m, so m consists of the polynomials with zero constant term and R/m≅k Evaluation at a point has kernel (x_1-a_1, ..., x_n-a_n), The quotient ring R/I with (r+I)(s+I)=rs+I.

[F2]

O is the localisation of R at the prime m, its denominators are the elements outside m, and it is a local ring with maximal ideal mO Localisation at a prime ideal: Rp=(R∖p)−1R, Rp is local with unique maximal ideal pRp, A local ring is a nonzero commutative ring with a unique maximal ideal.

[F3]

For an ideal I and a multiplicative set S there is a canonical isomorphism (S−1R)/(S−1I)≅Sˉ−1(R/I) Localisation commutes with quotient rings: S−1R/S−1I≅Sˉ−1(R/I).

[F4]

Length of a module is the number of factors in any composition series, and it is additive in short exact sequences Composition series and length of a module, Module length is additive in short exact sequences.

[F5]

The class of a unit is a unit; a proper ideal contains no unit; and in a commutative ring 1+u is invertible with inverse ∑i=0n−1(−u)i whenever un=0 The units of a ring are the invertible elements of its multiplicative monoid, and R× is a group under multiplication; 0∈R× only in the zero ring. A one-dimensional k-vector space is a simple module over k Vector space over a field, Composition series and length of a module.

[F6]

(t+12) is the number of 2-element subsets of {0,…,t} The set [A]k of k-element subsets and the binomial coefficient (nk):=∣[n]k∣. The bijection (i,j)↦{i,i+j+1} identifies the pairs i,j≥0, i+j<t with these subsets; the inverse for a<b is (a,b−a−1). There are d+1 pairs of total degree d, and induction on t gives ∑d=0t−1(d+1)=t(t+1)/2, with empty sum zero. This proves the binomial formula for all t≥0, including t=0. Dimension of a k-vector space is the common size of its finite bases Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis.

Proof

1.1F1F6givenalgebra

The classes of the monomials xiyj with i+j≤t−1 form a k-basis of R/mt. Indeed every monomial of total degree ≥t is a product of t or more linear forms and so lies in mt, and every element of mt, expanded as a sum of products of elements of m, is a sum of monomials of degree ≥t; hence mt is exactly the k-span of the monomials of degree ≥t and the displayed classes are a basis of the quotient. Consequently R/mt is nonzero for t≥1 with dim⁡k(R/mt)=#{(i,j):i+j≤t−1}=∑d=0t−1(d+1)=(t+12), while R/m0=R/R=0.

1.2F1F5givenalgebra

For t≥1 the ring R/mt is local with unique maximal ideal m/mt. Let f∈R∖m; writing f=c+g with c=f(0,0)∈k× and g∈m, the class of g has gt∈mt, so the class of f is c times the class of 1+g/c, which is a unit with inverse the finite geometric sum ∑i=0t−1(−g/c)i. Thus every element outside m/mt is a unit; since a proper ideal contains no unit, every proper ideal of R/mt is contained in m/mt, which is therefore the unique maximal ideal.

2.1step 1.2F2algebra

For t≥1 the localisation map λ:R/mt→(R/mt)m/mt is an isomorphism. It is surjective because a denominator outside m/mt is a unit by step 1.2, so a/s=a s−1; it is injective because λ(a)=0 means ua=0 for some u∉m/mt, and u is a unit, whence a=0.

3.1step 2.1F2F3construct

For t≥1, by [F3] applied to R, the ideal mt and the multiplicative set R∖m, there is a canonical isomorphism (R/mt)m/mt≅O/mtO. Composing with step 2.1 gives the required isomorphism R/mt→O/mtO for t≥1. For t=0, R/m0=R/R=0 and O/m0O=O/O=0, so the natural map is directly an isomorphism of zero rings.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1F5F6constructalgebra

Order the monomials of degree ≤t−1 by decreasing total degree and let Mj⊆R/mt be the k-span of the classes of the first j monomials, so that 0=M0<M1<⋯<MN=R/mt with N=(t+12). Multiplication by any element of m raises total degree, hence sends each Mj into Mj−1; therefore m acts as 0 on every quotient Mj/Mj−1, and each quotient is a one-dimensional k-vector space, spanned by one monomial class of some degree i+j=t−1,t−2,…,0. Transporting this chain through the ring isomorphism of step 3.1 gives a chain of O-submodules of O/mtO whose successive quotients are one-dimensional k-vector spaces.

5.1step 4.1F4F5F6given∎

Each successive quotient in step 4.1 is annihilated by m and is a one-dimensional k-vector space, hence simple as an O-module: an O-submodule would be a k-subspace, and there is no proper nonzero one. Therefore the transported chain is a composition series of O/mtO over O with N=(t+12) factors, so ℓO(O/mtO)=N; since the same chain exhibits a k-basis, dim⁡k(O/mtO)=N as well, and the displayed factors are the one-dimensional spaces spanned by the monomials xiyj with i+j=t−1,…,0.

Remarks

  • The case t=0. Here m0=R and both sides of the isomorphism are the zero ring, of length 0=(12); the composition series is empty. The statement includes t=0 so that the truncation maps of the later proofs are defined without a separate convention.
  • Choice. The argument is choice-free: it uses only the explicit monomial basis, the finite geometric sum, and the universal property of localisation. No maximal ideals are selected and no proper-ideal-into-maximal-ideal principle is invoked.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

74 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources