Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Global intersection length is the sum of the local multiplicities

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let C=V(F), D=V(G) be plane projective curves over the algebraically closed field k with no common component, and put X=Proj⁡(k[x0,x1,x2]/(F,G)). For p∈C∩D let xp∈X be the corresponding point. Then OX,xp≅OP2,p/(fp,gp) for local equations fp,gp of C and D at p, and consequently

len⁡k(X)=∑p∈C∩DIp(C,D).

In particular the local multiplicities are all finite and only finitely many points contribute.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, plane curves C=V(F), D=V(G) over the algebraically closed field k with no common component, and X=Proj⁡(k[x0,x1,x2]/(F,G)) Projective scheme of a homogeneous quotient and its standard affine charts.

[F1]

X is zero-dimensional with finitely many points, and X's points correspond bijectively to the points of C∩D: a point x∈X lies in a standard chart D+(xi), whose chart ring is k[u,v]/(fi,gi) for the dehomogenised forms, and the maximal ideals of that chart ring are the evaluation ideals at the common zeros of fi,gi A plane intersection with no common component is nonempty and zero-dimensional, A zero-dimensional projective scheme has finitely many closed points with finite-dimensional local rings, Prime and local-ring correspondence on standard projective charts, Two coprime projective plane forms meet in total length equal to their degree product, The residue field at a point of an affine scheme. AC enters through these published suppliers.

[F2]

The local ring of X at a point xp corresponding to p is OX,xp≅OP2,p/(fp,gp): in a chart containing p the chart ring is k[u,v]/(fi,gi) and OX,xp is its localisation at the prime of p; localisation commutes with the quotient, and the localisation of k[u,v] at p modulo the dehomogenised equations is OP2,p modulo the local ideal Two coprime projective plane forms meet in total length equal to their degree product, Localisation commutes with quotient rings: S−1R/S−1I≅Sˉ−1(R/I), A localisation is unique up to a unique isomorphism compatible with the map from R, Universal property of localisation: maps that invert S factor uniquely through S−1R.

[F3]

The total length is the finite weighted sum len⁡k(X)=∑x∈XℓOX,x(OX,x)[κ(x):k] Total length of a zero-dimensional projective scheme, and over the algebraically closed field every residue degree is one, κ(x)=k A field is algebraically closed exactly when every nonconstant polynomial splits, equivalently when it has no nontrivial finite extension, An algebraically closed field: every nonconstant polynomial has a root in the field.

[F4]

Since C,D have no common component, they share no local branch at any point, so each Ip(C,D) is finite by the finiteness lemma Finite local length exactly when no common local branch; the sum over the finite set C∩D is therefore a finite sum of finite numbers.

Proof

1.1F2given

Fix p∈C∩D and let xp be the corresponding point of X. By [F2] the local ring of X at xp is OX,xp≅OP2,p/(fp,gp), Write O=OP2,p and Q=O/(fp,gp). The O-submodules and Q-submodules of Q are exactly the same subsets, because the O-action factors through the surjection O→Q. Hence their composition series and lengths coincide; under the displayed isomorphism, ℓOX,xp(OX,xp)=ℓO(Q)=Ip(C,D).

2.1step 1.1F1F3F4∎

Combining [F3] with step 1.1 and the point correspondence [F1], the total length is len⁡k(X)=∑x∈XℓOX,x(OX,x)=∑p∈C∩DIp(C,D), the finite sum over the intersection points; each summand is finite by [F4].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

131 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources