Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Arithmetic genus, geometric genus and delta invariants

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and let k be algebraically closed. Let X be an integral proper finite-type curve over k with normalization ν:Xnu→X. Then pa(X)=g(Xnu)+∑x∈Xδx(X), the sum being finite and supported on the singular points of X; equivalently g(Xnu)=pa(X)−∑xδx(X).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An algebraically closed field k, an integral proper finite-type curve X over k, and its normalization ν:Xnu→X.

[F1]

The normalization ν:Xnu→X is finite, affine and birational, Xnu is an integral normal scheme with the same function field as X, and the pair is unique up to unique isomorphism over X; since k is algebraically closed, hence perfect, Xnu is a smooth proper curve over k and its geometric genus g(Xnu)=h1(Xnu,OXnu) is defined. (Normalization of an integral finite-type curve by gluing affine integral closures, Geometric genus of a singular curve, Finite morphisms are proper)

[F2]

The delta invariant of X at a closed point x is δx(X)=dim⁡k((ν∗OXnu)x/OX,x), a nonnegative integer, and δx(X)=0 if and only if x is a regular point of X; the singular locus of X is finite, so δ(X)=∑xδx(X) is a finite sum supported on the singular points. The quotient sheaf Q=(ν∗OXnu)/OX, where OX→ν∗OXnu is the natural map, has stalk Qx=(ν∗OXnu)x/OX,x and is coherent. (Delta invariant of a curve singularity, Finite morphisms are integral and universally closed, Coherent higher direct images under proper morphisms)

[F3]

For an integral proper curve X over k the arithmetic genus is pa(X)=1−χ(OX), and for a smooth proper geometrically integral curve C over k the genus is g(C)=h1(C,OC)=1−χ(OC), where H0(C,OC)=k and χ is the Euler characteristic of coherent sheaves on schemes proper over k, a finite alternating sum of finite-dimensional k-vector spaces. (Genus and arithmetic genus of a curve, Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf, Functions on a proper curve, Coherent module sheaves)

[F4]

For every short exact sequence 0→F′→F→F′′→0 of coherent sheaves on a scheme proper over k one has χ(F)=χ(F′)+χ(F′′). (Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences)

[F5]

If f:X→S is affine and F is quasi-coherent on X then Hq(S,f∗F)≅Hq(X,F) for all q≥0; a finite morphism is affine. (Affine pushforward is compatible with sheaf cohomology, Finite morphisms are integral and universally closed, Normalization of an integral finite-type curve by gluing affine integral closures)

[F6]

If i:Z→X is a closed immersion and F is quasi-coherent on Z then Hq(Z,F)≅Hq(X,i∗F) for all q≥0; and on an affine scheme every quasi-coherent sheaf has vanishing higher cohomology, Hq=0 for q>0. (Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward, Affine acyclicity of quasi-coherent sheaves)

[F7]

The direct image is given on opens by (i∗F)(U)=F(i−1U). (Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map)

[F8]

On an affine scheme U=Spec⁡A, every quasi-coherent module is canonically the associated sheaf of its module of global sections; if it is coherent, that module is finitely generated. For Q∣U≅M~, the sections on D(f) are Mf and the stalk at p is Mp. (Affine quasi-coherent sheaves are modules, Coherent module sheaves, Sections of the associated sheaf on basic opens, The stalk of an associated sheaf is the localisation)

[F9]

If M is a finitely generated A-module, then Supp⁡(M)=V(Ann⁡A(M)). (For a finite module, support is the set of primes containing the annihilator)

[F10]

A quasi-coherent ideal sheaf I⊆OX defines the closed subscheme S=V(I) with structure sheaf (OX/I)∣S, and on an affine chart U=Spec⁡A with I∣U=J~ this is Spec⁡(A/J), retaining the quotient's nilpotents. (Quasi-coherent ideal sheaves, Quasi-coherent ideals and closed subschemes, complete route)

[F11]

For a finite disjoint union of open-and-closed subschemes, sheaf cohomology is the finite product of the component cohomologies, and a quasi-coherent sheaf on an affine component has zero higher cohomology. (Cohomology of a finite disjoint union, Affine acyclicity of quasi-coherent sheaves)

Proof

technique · direct; split the structure sequence of the normalization into the delta quotient and compare Euler characteristics through affine and closed-immersion cohomology comparisons
1.1F1F3

Setting. The normalization ν is a finite, affine and birational morphism of integral curves with the same function field [F1]; Xnu is a smooth proper curve over the algebraically closed field k and g(Xnu)=h1(Xnu,OXnu) [F1]. In particular both X and Xnu are proper over k, so the Euler characteristic of [F3] is defined for all coherent sheaves occurring below.

1.2F1F2F3

The structure sequence. Since ν is birational and both sheaves sit inside the constant sheaf of the function field k(X), the natural map OX→ν∗OXnu is injective; let Q be its cokernel. Then 0⟶OX⟶ν∗OXnu⟶Q⟶0 is a short exact sequence of coherent OX-modules: ν∗OXnu is coherent because ν is finite and proper [F2], and Q is a quotient of a coherent sheaf on the locally Noetherian scheme X.

1.3F2

Support and stalks. For a closed point x one has Qx=(ν∗OXnu)x/OX,x [F2], so δx(X)=dim⁡kQx, and Qx=0 exactly when x is regular [F2]; the support S={x:Qx≠0} is the finite set of singular points of X and ∑x∈Sδx(X)=∑x∈Xδx(X).

1.4F5

Cohomology of the pushforward. Since ν is finite, hence affine, the comparison of [F5] identifies Hq(X,ν∗OXnu)≅Hq(Xnu,OXnu) for all q≥0; hence χ(X,ν∗OXnu)=χ(Xnu,OXnu).

2.1F3F4step 1.2

Euler characteristics of the structure sequence. Applying additivity [F4] to the sequence of step 1.2, all three terms being coherent on the proper curve X [F3], gives χ(X,OX)=χ(X,ν∗OXnu)−χ(X,Q).

2.2F7F8F9F10step 1.3

Cohomology of the delta quotient. Define the annihilator subsheaf I⊆OX by requiring a local function to act as the zero endomorphism of Q; this is a sheaf ideal because vanishing of a sheaf morphism is local. On an affine open U=Spec⁡A, write Q∣U≅M~ with M finitely generated [F8], and put JU=Ann⁡A(M)=Γ(U,I); the equality holds because a∈A annihilates M exactly when it annihilates every localization Mf=Q(D(f)) on the principal-open basis of U. These ideals localize correctly: if M=0 the equality Ann⁡Af(Mf)=(JU)f is immediate; otherwise choose finite generators m1,…,mr. If a/fn annihilates Mf, then for each j some ej≥0 has fejamj=0; taking e=max⁡jej gives fea∈JU, hence a/fn∈(JU)f. The reverse inclusion is immediate. By the definition of I, Γ(D(f),I)=Ann⁡Af(Mf), so this localization identity shows that I∣U=JU~ on the principal-open basis. The affine descriptions agree on overlaps because they are restrictions of the intrinsic annihilator subsheaf; in particular I is quasi-coherent [F8]. By [F9], on each such U the support of Q is V(JU), and the closed subscheme i:S=V(I)↪X from [F10] therefore has underlying space exactly the finite set in step 1.3. This is the annihilator thickening, not the reduced support; it retains any nilpotents in OX/I. Since I annihilates Q, the OX-action on Q factors through OS. On S∩U=Spec⁡(A/JU) define G by the same module M, now regarded as an A/JU-module. The restriction maps inherited from Q are OS-linear because I annihilates Q, and their cocycle identities are inherited from those of Q; hence they glue the local modules to a quasi-coherent OS-module G. For every principal open D(f)⊆U, the direct image definition and the associated-sheaf section formula identify (i∗G)(D(f))=Mfˉ=Mf=Q(D(f)), compatibly with restrictions; hence i∗G≅Q.

The finite set ∣S∣ consists of closed points, so each singleton is closed in S and, since its complement is a finite union of closed singletons, open as well. Thus S is the finite disjoint union of its one-point open-and-closed components Sx. Each Sx is affine: an affine open neighborhood of its unique point is all of Sx. Its unique prime is its unique maximal ideal, so every element outside that prime is a unit; the affine associated-module and stalk identifications [F8] therefore give Γ(Sx,G∣Sx)≅Gx≅(i∗G)x=Qx. By [F11], higher cohomology of G on each affine Sx vanishes and cohomology on the finite disjoint union is the product of the component groups. Consequently Hq(S,G)=0 for q>0 and dim⁡kH0(S,G)=∑x∈Sdim⁡kQx=∑x∈Sδx(X). Applying the closed-immersion cohomology comparison [F6] to i and G gives the same conclusions for Hq(X,Q). [F6, F7, F8, F11, step 1.3]

3.1F3step 1.3step 2.2

Euler characteristic of the quotient. By step 2.2 only H0 contributes, so χ(X,Q)=∑x∈Sδx(X), the sum being finite by step 1.3.

4.1F1F3step 2.1step 1.4step 3.1

Arithmetic and geometric genus. Substituting steps 1.4 and 3.1 into step 2.1 gives χ(X,OX)=χ(Xnu,OXnu)−∑xδx(X). By [F3] one has 1−pa(X)=χ(X,OX) and, since H0(Xnu,OXnu)=k [F3], also χ(Xnu,OXnu)=1−g(Xnu). Therefore 1−pa(X)=1−g(Xnu)−∑xδx(X), that is, pa(X)=g(Xnu)+∑xδx(X).

5.1

Conclusion. For an integral proper finite-type curve over an algebraically closed field, the arithmetic genus exceeds the geometric genus of the normalization exactly by the total delta invariant, pa(X)=g(Xnu)+∑xδx(X), the sum finite and supported on the singular points by step 1.3; equivalently g(Xnu)=pa(X)−∑xδx(X). The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the normalization, finiteness and cohomology suppliers used in steps 1.1, 1.4 and 2.2. ∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

193 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources