How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Normalization of an integral finite-type curve by gluing affine integral closures
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. It is inherited through the normality-locality criterion and the finite-morphism criteria for finiteness and integrality used in the proof. Let be an integral separated finite-type curve over a field with function field , and let be a finite affine cover with . The integral closures of in are finite -modules and their formation commutes with principal localisation. On each overlap , common principal-open refinements give identifications of the corresponding localizations inside , so the glue over the overlaps to a scheme and a morphism . Then is integral and normal, is finite, affine and birational, , and is the normalization of : it is initial among normal integral schemes finite and birational over , hence unique up to unique isomorphism over .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integral separated finite-type -scheme of chain dimension one, the function field , and a finite affine open cover with .
If is a finite-type integral domain over a field, then the integral closure of in is a finite -module. (A finite-type domain over a field has finite normalization)
For a finite-type integral domain over a field with integral closure in and , the integral closure of in is exactly , and is a finite -module. (Finite normalization commutes with principal localization)
Affine schemes equipped with open subschemes and isomorphisms on overlaps satisfying the identity and cocycle conditions glue to a scheme, uniquely up to unique isomorphism, and the given affine schemes become an open affine cover. (Gluing affine schemes along compatible open isomorphisms)
For an integral finite-type -scheme , the stalk at the generic point is canonically for every nonempty affine open . (Function field of an integral finite-type scheme)
If is separated and , are affine opens mapping into the same affine open , then is affine and the natural map is surjective. In particular, for , the map is surjective. (Affine-overlap criterion for separatedness)
Compatible morphisms of schemes on an open cover of a scheme glue uniquely; two morphisms out of a scheme are equal if their restrictions to an open cover are equal. (Morphisms of schemes are local on compatible open covers)
Every finite morphism is affine. Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a morphism is finite if and only if there is an affine open cover such that each is affine and is a finite module over . (Finite is affine and local on its target)
Every algebra of finite type over a principal ideal domain is a Noetherian ring; a field is a principal ideal domain under the library's convention, so the field case is included. (Every algebra of finite type over a principal ideal domain is a Noetherian ring)
For a domain with fraction field , the integral closure of in a field extension is the set of elements of integral over , and is integrally closed when every element of integral over lies in . (Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains)
A Noetherian commutative ring is normal when every prime localisation is an integrally closed domain; for a domain this means that every element of its fraction field integral over it belongs to it. (normal noetherian ring)
A morphism of integral finite-type -schemes is birational when and the induced map on function fields is an isomorphism. (Birational morphisms of integral finite-type schemes)
For commutative unital rings the assignment is a natural bijection ; hence is a contravariant equivalence with quasi-inverse global sections. (Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings)
For a commutative ring , a Zariski-open and there is with . (Every point of a Zariski-open set has a distinguished-open neighbourhood inside it)
A morphism is finite if for every affine open the inverse image is affine, , with module-finite over . (Finite morphisms of schemes)
A nonempty scheme is integral exactly when every nonempty affine open is the spectrum of a domain; the criterion is independent of the chosen affine cover. (Integral schemes)
For a commutative ring and , the principal distinguished subset is . (Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum)
The integral closure of a domain in a field extension of its fraction field is an integrally closed domain. (The integral closure of a domain in a field extension is integrally closed)
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a domain is integrally closed if and only if all of its prime localizations are integrally closed; equivalently it is enough that all maximal localizations be integrally closed. The implication from integral closedness to local integral closedness and the converse are both included. (A domain is integrally closed if and only if its prime localisations are, equivalently if and only if its maximal localisations are)
A module-finite algebra over a Noetherian ring is Noetherian. (A module-finite algebra over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring, and so is every ring between the two)
A Noetherian scheme has a finite affine open cover by spectra of Noetherian rings, and a scheme is normal when all of its local rings are integrally closed domains; on an affine chart this is the local normality condition for its Noetherian coordinate ring. (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes, Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme)
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, every ring map induced by a finite morphism on affine charts is integral. (Finite morphisms are integral and universally closed)
Proof technique: direct, by gluing the affine normalisations of a finite affine cover and checking the universal property chartwise.
Proof
Delete empty members of the finite cover. Each remaining is a domain, since is a nonempty affine open of the integral scheme [F15], and is a finitely generated -algebra because is of finite type over . By [F4] the fraction field is canonically identified with , and these identifications are compatible on overlaps, so all of them may be regarded as subfields of one copy of . Each is affine by [F5], since is separated over and all affine opens of lie over the single affine open .
Let be the integral closure of in [F9]. By [F1], is a finite -module and a domain with fraction field . The integral-closure theorem [F17] makes integrally closed. Since is a principal ideal domain, [F8] makes each finite-type Noetherian; [F19] then makes the module-finite -algebra Noetherian. Applying both directions of [F18] to , all of its prime localizations are integrally closed, so is normal in the Noetherian-ring sense [F10].
For the integral closure of the principal localisation in is exactly and is a finite -module, by [F2]. Consequently the ring attached to the chart is determined on each principal open by that open alone, namely as inside .
Gluing data. Fix and put , which is affine by [F5]. Let be the inverse image of in . We construct compatible identifications locally on . For each point , choose principal opens and containing and contained in ; such choices exist by [F13]. On the restriction of is a regular function, hence is represented by an element of ; write it as . Then as an open of . Similarly, on the restriction of is represented by in , so the same intersection is as an open of . Thus is a common principal-open neighborhood of in . Its coordinate rings, computed in either chart, are the same subring of , since both are . By [F2], the integral closures of this ring in are respectively and , so these localizations are equal inside . The identity of that ring induces an isomorphism between the corresponding opens in the two normalization charts. These common opens cover ; the isomorphisms agree on further intersections because every ring map is the identity inside . They therefore glue to an isomorphism over . The same identity-in- argument gives inverse maps and the cocycle condition on triple overlaps. No single distinguished open of is assumed to be represented by one element of .
Gluing. By [F3] the affine schemes , equipped with the open subschemes and the compatible isomorphisms , glue to a scheme on which the charts form an open affine cover.
The morphism . Each inclusion induces a -morphism by [F12]. On the common principal-open refinements from step 1.4, the chart isomorphism is induced by the identity of the localized integral-closure ring inside ; both composites to are therefore the same map to the overlap . The chart morphisms agree on the open overlaps and glue by [F6] to . The transition maps are these normalization-chart isomorphisms over , not inclusions of one chart into the other.
is integral, normal and has function field . Every chart is integral and has generic point with local ring . Any two remaining meet in a nonempty open because is irreducible. The inverse image of that overlap contains the generic point of each normalization chart, and the transition maps identify those generic points by the identity of . They therefore give one point lying in every chart. It is dense in each chart because each is a domain, hence dense in ; this proves global irreducibility. The charts are reduced, so the glued scheme is reduced and therefore integral. Their finite affine cover has Noetherian coordinate rings by step 1.2, so is Noetherian; [F18] makes every local ring integrally closed, hence the scheme is normal by [F20]. The common generic local ring is , so .
Finiteness. For each we have by construction, and is a finite -module by [F1]. The cover is a finite affine open cover of the target, so the local criterion [F7] shows that is finite; in particular is affine by the choice-free first half of [F7].
Birationality. The map sends the common generic point of step 2.3 to the generic point of and induces the identity map on function fields. It is therefore dominant and birational by [F11].
Initiality. Let be finite and birational, with normal and integral. For each , and is a finite -algebra by [F7, F14]. The preimage contains the generic point, so is a domain. Birationality and [F4] identify with ; under these identifications the map is injective, so regard it as an inclusion. The finite affine covers and [F8], [F19] make and Noetherian; normality of says every localization is an integrally closed domain [F20]. By the converse direction of [F18], itself is integrally closed in . The finite-morphism theorem [F21] makes every element of integral over , so . Conversely, each is integral over and lies in , so integral closedness of gives . Thus as subrings of for every . The identity ring maps on these equal chart algebras induce chart isomorphisms in both directions, and they glue by [F6] to morphisms and over . They are inverse because their restrictions on each affine chart are identities. Any morphism over induces the identity on the generic function field ; its chart ring maps are therefore the identity on , so it equals . The same argument for a morphism makes it equal to . Thus both maps are unique, and in particular proves initiality in the stated direction.
Uniqueness of the normalization. Let be another normal integral scheme finite and birational over . Step 4.1 gives unique maps and over . Uniqueness forces and to be the identity maps. Hence and are inverse isomorphisms, unique over .
Conclusion and Choice accounting. Steps 1.2 and 1.3 prove finiteness of the affine integral closures and compatibility with principal localization; steps 1.4, 2.1 and 2.2 construct the glued scheme and morphism; steps 3.1 and 3.2 prove that the morphism is finite, affine and birational; step 2.3 proves integrality, normality and the function-field identity; and steps 4.1 and 5.1 prove initiality and uniqueness. The Axiom of Choice is inherited through the normality-locality criterion [F18], the local criterion for finiteness [F7], and the finite-morphism integrality theorem [F21]; these are used in steps 1.2, 3.1, and 4.1.
Depends on
- Every algebra of finite type over a principal ideal domain is a Noetherian ring
- Affine open subschemes
- The Axiom of Choice
- Birational morphisms of integral finite-type schemes
- The field of fractions $\operatorname{Frac}(D)=(D\setminus\{0\})^{-1}D$ of an integral domain
- Finite morphisms of schemes
- Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains
- Integral schemes
- Morphisms of schemes
- normal noetherian ring
- Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme
- Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes
- Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum
- Separated morphism of schemes
- Every point of a Zariski-open set has a distinguished-open neighbourhood inside it
- Finite is affine and local on its target
- Finite normalization commutes with principal localization
- Function field of an integral finite-type scheme
- Morphisms of schemes are local on compatible open covers
- Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings
- Gluing affine schemes along compatible open isomorphisms
- A finite-type domain over a field has finite normalization
- The integral closure of a domain in a field extension is integrally closed
- A domain is integrally closed if and only if its prime localisations are, equivalently if and only if its maximal localisations are
- A module-finite algebra over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring, and so is every ring between the two
- Finite morphisms are integral and universally closed
- Affine-overlap criterion for separatedness
Used by
- Geometric genus of a plane curve by delta invariants Corollary
- Delta invariant of a curve singularity Definition
- Geometric genus of a singular curve Definition
- A smooth conic is a projective line once it has a rational point Example
- Cuspidal cubic: delta invariant and normalization Example
- Nodal cubic: arithmetic genus one, delta one, geometric genus zero Example
- Ramification of the double cover y²=f(x) Example
- Smooth plane quartic has genus three Example
- Arithmetic genus, geometric genus and delta invariants Lemma
- Smooth proper curves, dominant morphisms and function fields Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
116 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Algebraic Curves (tag 0BRV) (standard reference, not scraped)
- William Fulton, Algebraic Curves (Internet Archive copy), Chs. 6-8 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jiahui Gao and Shouwu Zhang, Lectures on Algebraic Geometry (December 14, 2019), Ch. 7 (standard reference, not scraped)