Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normalization of an integral finite-type curve by gluing affine integral closures

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. It is inherited through the normality-locality criterion and the finite-morphism criteria for finiteness and integrality used in the proof. Let C be an integral separated finite-type curve over a field k with function field K=k(C), and let C=U1∪⋯∪Un be a finite affine cover with Ui=Spec⁡(Ai). The integral closures Bi of Ai in K are finite Ai-modules and their formation commutes with principal localisation. On each overlap Ui∩Uj, common principal-open refinements give identifications of the corresponding localizations inside K, so the Spec⁡(Bi) glue over the overlaps to a scheme Cnu and a morphism ν:Cnu→C. Then Cnu is integral and normal, ν is finite, affine and birational, k(Cnu)=K, and (Cnu,ν) is the normalization of C: it is initial among normal integral schemes finite and birational over C, hence unique up to unique isomorphism over C.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integral separated finite-type k-scheme C of chain dimension one, the function field K=k(C), and a finite affine open cover C=U1∪⋯∪Un with Ui=Spec⁡(Ai).

[F1]

If A is a finite-type integral domain over a field, then the integral closure of A in Frac⁡(A) is a finite A-module. (A finite-type domain over a field has finite normalization)

[F2]

For a finite-type integral domain A over a field with integral closure B in Frac⁡(A) and 0≠f∈A, the integral closure of Af in Frac⁡(A) is exactly Bf, and Bf is a finite Af-module. (Finite normalization commutes with principal localization)

[F3]

Affine schemes equipped with open subschemes and isomorphisms on overlaps satisfying the identity and cocycle conditions glue to a scheme, uniquely up to unique isomorphism, and the given affine schemes become an open affine cover. (Gluing affine schemes along compatible open isomorphisms)

[F4]

For an integral finite-type k-scheme X, the stalk K(X)=OX,η at the generic point is canonically Frac⁡Γ(U,OX) for every nonempty affine open U=Spec⁡A⊆X. (Function field of an integral finite-type scheme)

[F5]

If f:X→S is separated and U=Spec⁡R, V=Spec⁡T are affine opens mapping into the same affine open W=Spec⁡A⊆S, then U∩V is affine and the natural map R⊗AT→Γ(U∩V,OX) is surjective. In particular, for S=Spec⁡k, the map R⊗kT→Γ(U∩V,OX) is surjective. (Affine-overlap criterion for separatedness)

[F6]

Compatible morphisms of schemes on an open cover of a scheme glue uniquely; two morphisms out of a scheme are equal if their restrictions to an open cover are equal. (Morphisms of schemes are local on compatible open covers)

[F7]

Every finite morphism is affine. Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a morphism f:X→S is finite if and only if there is an affine open cover S=⋃iUi such that each f−1(Ui) is affine and Γ(f−1(Ui),OX) is a finite module over Γ(Ui,OS). (Finite is affine and local on its target)

[F8]

Every algebra of finite type over a principal ideal domain is a Noetherian ring; a field is a principal ideal domain under the library's convention, so the field case is included. (Every algebra of finite type over a principal ideal domain is a Noetherian ring)

[F9]

For a domain A with fraction field Frac⁡(A), the integral closure of A in a field extension K is the set of elements of K integral over A, and A is integrally closed when every element of Frac⁡(A) integral over A lies in A. (Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains)

[F10]

A Noetherian commutative ring R is normal when every prime localisation Rp is an integrally closed domain; for a domain this means that every element of its fraction field integral over it belongs to it. (normal noetherian ring)

[F11]

A morphism f:X→Y of integral finite-type k-schemes is birational when f(ηX)=ηY and the induced map K(Y)→K(X) on function fields is an isomorphism. (Birational morphisms of integral finite-type schemes)

[F12]

For commutative unital rings A,B the assignment φ↦Spec⁡(φ) is a natural bijection Hom⁡(A,B)≅Hom⁡(Spec⁡B,Spec⁡A); hence Spec⁡ is a contravariant equivalence with quasi-inverse global sections. (Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings)

[F13]

For a commutative ring R, a Zariski-open U⊆Spec⁡(R) and p∈U there is f∈R with p∈D(f)⊆U. (Every point of a Zariski-open set has a distinguished-open neighbourhood inside it)

[F14]

A morphism f:X→S is finite if for every affine open U=Spec⁡A⊆S the inverse image is affine, f−1(U)=Spec⁡B, with B module-finite over A. (Finite morphisms of schemes)

[F15]

A nonempty scheme is integral exactly when every nonempty affine open is the spectrum of a domain; the criterion is independent of the chosen affine cover. (Integral schemes)

[F16]

For a commutative ring R and f∈R, the principal distinguished subset is D(f)={p:f∉p}. (Principal distinguished subsets of the prime spectrum)

[F17]

The integral closure of a domain A in a field extension of its fraction field is an integrally closed domain. (The integral closure of a domain in a field extension is integrally closed)

[F18]

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a domain is integrally closed if and only if all of its prime localizations are integrally closed; equivalently it is enough that all maximal localizations be integrally closed. The implication from integral closedness to local integral closedness and the converse are both included. (A domain is integrally closed if and only if its prime localisations are, equivalently if and only if its maximal localisations are)

[F20]

A Noetherian scheme has a finite affine open cover by spectra of Noetherian rings, and a scheme is normal when all of its local rings are integrally closed domains; on an affine chart this is the local normality condition for its Noetherian coordinate ring. (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes, Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme)

[F21]

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, every ring map induced by a finite morphism on affine charts is integral. (Finite morphisms are integral and universally closed)

Proof technique: direct, by gluing the affine normalisations of a finite affine cover and checking the universal property chartwise.

Proof

1.1F4F5F15given

Delete empty members of the finite cover. Each remaining Ai is a domain, since Ui is a nonempty affine open of the integral scheme C [F15], and Ai is a finitely generated k-algebra because C is of finite type over k. By [F4] the fraction field Frac⁡(Ai) is canonically identified with K=OC,η, and these identifications are compatible on overlaps, so all of them may be regarded as subfields of one copy of K. Each Ui∩Uj is affine by [F5], since C is separated over Spec⁡k and all affine opens of C lie over the single affine open Spec⁡k.

1.2F1F8F9F10F17F18F19

Let Bi⊆K be the integral closure of Ai in K [F9]. By [F1], Bi is a finite Ai-module and a domain with fraction field K. The integral-closure theorem [F17] makes Bi integrally closed. Since k is a principal ideal domain, [F8] makes each finite-type Ai Noetherian; [F19] then makes the module-finite Ai-algebra Bi Noetherian. Applying both directions of [F18] to Bi, all of its prime localizations are integrally closed, so Bi is normal in the Noetherian-ring sense [F10].

1.3F2

For 0≠f∈Ai the integral closure of the principal localisation (Ai)f in K is exactly (Bi)f and (Bi)f is a finite (Ai)f-module, by [F2]. Consequently the ring Bi attached to the chart is determined on each principal open D(f)⊆Ui by that open alone, namely as (Bi)f inside K.

1.4F2F12F13F16

Gluing data. Fix i,j and put W=Ui∩Uj, which is affine by [F5]. Let Vij be the inverse image of W in Spec⁡(Bi). We construct compatible identifications locally on W. For each point w∈W, choose principal opens D(f)⊆Ui and D(g)⊆Uj containing w and contained in W; such choices exist by [F13]. On D(f) the restriction of g is a regular function, hence is represented by an element of (Ai)f; write it as c/fr. Then D(f)∩D(g)=D(fc) as an open of Ui. Similarly, on D(g) the restriction of f is represented by d/gs in (Aj)g, so the same intersection is D(gd) as an open of Uj. Thus D(fc)=D(gd) is a common principal-open neighborhood of w in W. Its coordinate rings, computed in either chart, are the same subring of K, since both are Γ(D(fc),OC). By [F2], the integral closures of this ring in K are respectively (Bi)fc and (Bj)gd, so these localizations are equal inside K. The identity of that ring induces an isomorphism between the corresponding opens in the two normalization charts. These common opens cover W; the isomorphisms agree on further intersections because every ring map is the identity inside K. They therefore glue to an isomorphism Vij→Vji over W. The same identity-in-K argument gives inverse maps and the cocycle condition on triple overlaps. No single distinguished open of Ui is assumed to be represented by one element of Aj.

2.1F3step 1.4

Gluing. By [F3] the affine schemes Spec⁡(Bi), equipped with the open subschemes Vij and the compatible isomorphisms φij, glue to a scheme Cnu on which the charts Spec⁡(Bi) form an open affine cover.

2.2F6F12step 1.4

The morphism ν. Each inclusion Ai⊆Bi induces a k-morphism Spec⁡(Bi)→Ui by [F12]. On the common principal-open refinements from step 1.4, the chart isomorphism is induced by the identity of the localized integral-closure ring inside K; both composites to C are therefore the same map to the overlap W. The chart morphisms agree on the open overlaps and glue by [F6] to ν:Cnu→C. The transition maps are these normalization-chart isomorphisms over W, not inclusions of one chart into the other.

2.3F4F15F18F20step 1.2

Cnu is integral, normal and has function field K. Every chart Spec⁡(Bi) is integral and has generic point with local ring K. Any two remaining Ui,Uj meet in a nonempty open because C is irreducible. The inverse image of that overlap contains the generic point of each normalization chart, and the transition maps identify those generic points by the identity of K. They therefore give one point η lying in every chart. It is dense in each chart because each Bi is a domain, hence dense in Cnu; this proves global irreducibility. The charts are reduced, so the glued scheme is reduced and therefore integral. Their finite affine cover has Noetherian coordinate rings by step 1.2, so Cnu is Noetherian; [F18] makes every local ring integrally closed, hence the scheme is normal by [F20]. The common generic local ring is K, so k(Cnu)=K.

3.1F1F7F14step 2.2step 1.2

Finiteness. For each i we have ν−1(Ui)=Spec⁡(Bi) by construction, and Bi is a finite Ai-module by [F1]. The cover C=⋃iUi is a finite affine open cover of the target, so the local criterion [F7] shows that ν is finite; in particular ν is affine by the choice-free first half of [F7].

3.2F4F11step 2.2step 2.3

Birationality. The map ν sends the common generic point η of step 2.3 to the generic point of C and induces the identity map K→K on function fields. It is therefore dominant and birational by [F11].

4.1F4F6F7F14F18F20F21step 1.2step 2.3step 3.2

Initiality. Let h:Z→C be finite and birational, with Z normal and integral. For each i, h−1(Ui)=Spec⁡(Di) and Di is a finite Ai-algebra by [F7, F14]. The preimage contains the generic point, so Di is a domain. Birationality and [F4] identify Frac⁡(Di) with K; under these identifications the map Ai→Di is injective, so regard it as an inclusion. The finite affine covers and [F8], [F19] make C and Z Noetherian; normality of Z says every localization (Di)q is an integrally closed domain [F20]. By the converse direction of [F18], Di itself is integrally closed in K. The finite-morphism theorem [F21] makes every element of Di integral over Ai, so Di⊆Bi. Conversely, each b∈Bi is integral over Ai⊆Di and lies in K, so integral closedness of Di gives b∈Di. Thus Di=Bi as subrings of K for every i. The identity ring maps on these equal chart algebras induce chart isomorphisms in both directions, and they glue by [F6] to morphisms ϕ:Cnu→Z and ψ:Z→Cnu over C. They are inverse because their restrictions on each affine chart are identities. Any morphism Cnu→Z over C induces the identity on the generic function field K; its chart ring maps are therefore the identity on Di=Bi⊆K, so it equals ϕ. The same argument for a morphism Z→Cnu makes it equal to ψ. Thus both maps are unique, and in particular ϕ proves initiality in the stated direction.

5.1step 4.1

Uniqueness of the normalization. Let (C′,ν′) be another normal integral scheme finite and birational over C. Step 4.1 gives unique maps u:Cnu→C′ and v:C′→Cnu over C. Uniqueness forces v∘u and u∘v to be the identity maps. Hence u and v are inverse isomorphisms, unique over C.

6.1F7F18F21step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3step 3.1step 3.2step 4.1step 5.1∎

Conclusion and Choice accounting. Steps 1.2 and 1.3 prove finiteness of the affine integral closures and compatibility with principal localization; steps 1.4, 2.1 and 2.2 construct the glued scheme and morphism; steps 3.1 and 3.2 prove that the morphism is finite, affine and birational; step 2.3 proves integrality, normality and the function-field identity; and steps 4.1 and 5.1 prove initiality and uniqueness. The Axiom of Choice is inherited through the normality-locality criterion [F18], the local criterion for finiteness [F7], and the finite-morphism integrality theorem [F21]; these are used in steps 1.2, 3.1, and 4.1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

116 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources