How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite is affine and local on its target
Statement
Every finite morphism is affine. Assume the Axiom of Choice (AC). A morphism is finite if and only if there exists an affine open cover such that each is affine and The finite-to-affine implication follows directly from the definition and is choice-free. AC is used in the local converse to infer affineness from the cover and to obtain the unit-ideal relations needed to descend finite module generation.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A morphism of schemes ; for the local criterion, an affine open cover whose inverse images are affine and whose coordinate ring maps are module-finite; AC is assumed for the converse.
A finite morphism has affine inverse image over every affine target open and the associated coordinate algebra is module-finite over the target ring (Finite morphisms of schemes).
A morphism is affine exactly when every affine target open has affine inverse image (Affine morphisms).
Module-finite means finitely generated as a module over the indicated ring (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras).
Assuming AC, affineness of a morphism can be checked on an affine open cover of the target (Affineness is local on the target).
AC says every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; this item assumes it only for the reverse local criterion (The Axiom of Choice).
Every affine scheme is quasi-compact, including the empty affine scheme (Every affine scheme is quasi-compact).
The distinguished opens form a basis on an affine spectrum (The underlying space of an affine spectrum).
Every morphism between affine schemes is induced by a unique ring map in the opposite direction, and global sections recover the affine coordinate ring (Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings).
A principal localization identifies its spectrum with the corresponding distinguished open (A principal localization identifies its spectrum with a distinguished open).
Sections of an affine structure sheaf on are the localized ring (Sections and restrictions on distinguished opens of an affine scheme).
The fibre product of affine schemes over an affine scheme is the affine spectrum of the tensor-product ring (Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products).
The inverse image of an open subscheme is the fibre product with that open subscheme (Restricting fibre products to open subschemes).
Assuming AC, a distinguished-open cover of a spectrum implies that its defining elements generate the unit ideal (A distinguished-open cover of the spectrum forces the covering ideal to be the unit ideal).
A module is finitely generated when it is generated by a finite subset (Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module).
Module localization consists of fractions , with the relation specified by its localization definition (Localisation of a module at a multiplicative subset).
A module fraction is zero exactly when a denominator kills its numerator (A localised module fraction is zero exactly when one denominator kills its numerator).
Principal localization at inverts the powers of (Principal localisation ).
Localizing a module is canonically tensoring it with the localized ring (Localisation of modules is extension of scalars).
For modules over a commutative ring, the flip , , is an isomorphism (Symmetry and associativity isomorphisms for tensor products over a commutative ring).
The ideal generated by a finite family consists of its finite linear combinations (In a commutative ring, consists of finite sums , and ).
Proof
If is finite, [F1] gives affine inverse images over every affine open of , so [F2] says is affine. It also gives the stated condition on any affine open cover. This direction uses only the definition of finite.
Conversely, assume AC and the stated affine-cover condition. [F4] applies to the cover and shows that is affine. This is the first use of AC: it is confined to inferring global affineness from local affine inverse images.
Fix an arbitrary affine open . By step 1.2, write . If , then by the affine-scheme/ring correspondence [F7], so is finite over ; assume henceforth that is nonempty. The restricted affine morphism induces a ring map by [F7].
Consider all pairs for which and the distinguished open lies in . These opens cover : each is open in , and [F6] supplies a distinguished-open neighbourhood of each of its points contained in that intersection. By [F5], choose a finite subcover , retaining for each selected member its cover index . The family of all such pairs was considered, so this finite subcover requires no simultaneous choice over the points of .
Fix one selected and put by [F8, F9]. Since , [F11] identifies with . Both factors are affine, so [F10] identifies this inverse image with the spectrum of , where . The ring is module-finite over by the cover hypothesis and [F3]. A finite -module generating list tensors to a finite -module generating list, so the coordinate algebra of is finite over .
The same open restriction [F11], now over , and the affine tensor formula [F10] identify the coordinate module of with . Flip the factors by [F18], then apply [F17] to to identify this with the localization of the -module at powers of . Since the coordinate algebra in step 4.1 is finite over , each such localized module is finitely generated over .
For each of the finitely many , choose a finite -module generating list for . Each generator is a fraction with numerator in and denominator a power of ; because that denominator is a unit after localization, its numerator can replace it in the generating list. Let be the -submodule generated by all these finitely many numerators. Only finitely many lists are selected, which follows by induction on the finite index set and uses no AC. Then is finitely generated by [F13], and for every .
Fix . Since , for each there are and such that in . Multiplying this equality by the unit in the localization [F16] shows . By [F15], some power kills . These witnesses are selected for only finitely many , so finite induction suffices and no AC is used. A positive power then sends into (if the resulting exponent is zero, increase it to one). Primeness gives , so these distinguished opens still cover [F6].
By [F12], the finite family generates the unit ideal of . By [F19], write with . For the arbitrary from step 7.1, each lies in , so . Thus is a finite -module. This is the second AC use: [F12] supplies the unit-ideal relation from the principal cover.
Since was an arbitrary affine open, step 8.1 gives an affine inverse image with module-finite coordinate algebra over every such ; [F1] then shows is finite. For the localization is the zero module and ; for the localization is the whole module. If or an inverse-image chart is empty, its affine ring is zero and the zero module is generated by the empty list. No injectivity, flatness, reducedness, or finite-type assumption is used. The forward implication in step 1.1 remains choice-free, while the reverse implication assumes AC exactly as stated.
Depends on
- Finite morphisms of schemes
- Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras
- Affine morphisms
- Affineness is local on the target
- The Axiom of Choice
- Every affine scheme is quasi-compact
- The underlying space of an affine spectrum
- Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings
- A principal localization identifies its spectrum with a distinguished open
- Sections and restrictions on distinguished opens of an affine scheme
- Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products
- Restricting fibre products to open subschemes
- A distinguished-open cover of the spectrum forces the covering ideal to be the unit ideal
- Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module
- Localisation of a module at a multiplicative subset
- Principal localisation $R_f=\{1,f,f^2,\ldots\}^{-1}R$
- A localised module fraction is zero exactly when one denominator kills its numerator
- Localisation of modules is extension of scalars
- Symmetry and associativity isomorphisms for tensor products over a commutative ring
- In a commutative ring, $(S)$ consists of finite sums $\sum r_i s_i$, and $(a)=Ra$
Used by
- Finite morphisms are proper Corollary
- Finite morphisms survive base change and composition Lemma
- Finite neighbourhood of an isolated fibre point after elementary etale change Lemma
- Finite pullback preserves absolute ampleness Lemma
- Scheme Zariski Main factorization for separated quasi-finite morphisms Lemma
- A proper quasi-finite morphism is finite Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
65 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Project, Morphisms of Schemes, Lemma 29.45.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks Project, Algebra, Lemma 10.36.14(2) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks Project, Morphisms of Schemes, §§29.11 and 29.45 (standard reference, not scraped)