How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products
Statement
Let and be maps of commutative unital rings, allowing the zero ring. In the category of all schemes, The projections correspond to and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects, hypotheses and conventions in the statement above.
Let and be morphisms of schemes. A fibre product is a scheme , with projections and , such that and, for every scheme and morphisms , with , there is exactly one satisfying and . Thus, naturally in every test scheme , Write . The commutative square with edges is Cartesian when it has this universal property. Morphisms here are morphisms of locally ringed spaces, as in def-morphism-of-schemes. No existence assertion is part of the definition. (Fibre product of schemes)
For a scheme and a ring , taking global sections induces a natural bijection (Morphisms to an affine scheme and global sections)
Let be commutative -algebras. For every pair of -algebra homomorphisms and , there is a unique -algebra homomorphism such that and . It is given by Thus , with its two canonical maps, is the coproduct of and among commutative -algebras. (Universal mapping property of the tensor product of commutative algebras)
Proof
For an arbitrary scheme , put . Compatible maps from to the two affine factors are, by the natural bijection in F2, exactly ring maps and whose restrictions to agree.
Use their common restriction to regard as an -algebra. F3 gives precisely one ring map , sending to the product of the two images. F2 converts it to precisely one morphism with the desired projections.
This is the universal property F1, for every , not only affine . The argument permits zero rings: a map to is possible precisely for the empty test scheme, whose ring of sections is zero. Tensor-unit and identity cases use the same formula.
Depends on
Used by
- Affine schemes and affine morphisms are separated Corollary
- Global functions on geometrically connected and geometrically reduced proper schemes Corollary
- A flat family with a nodal special fibre is not smooth at the node Counterexample
- Frobenius on the affine line is finite flat but not smooth Counterexample
- Rational points do not detect the group-scheme structure of alphaₚ and muₚ Counterexample
- The affine line is not proper Counterexample
- The doubled-origin diagonal is not closed Counterexample
- The orbit set of k-points need not be the k-points of the fppf quotient sheaf Counterexample
- The coordinate Hopf algebra of an affine group scheme Definition
- Additive and infinitesimal group schemes Example
- Incidence projection has closed determinantal image Example
- The affine plane and the pair of generic points Example
- The diagonal of the affine line Example
- The family xy=t Example
- The graph of a polynomial map as a closed subscheme Example
- The group schemes Ga, Gm, and GLn Example
- The Hopf algebra of a split torus and its root-of-unity subgroups Example
- The product of two parabolas: a block Jacobian and the direct-sum formula Example
- The projective-line diagonal from the bihomogeneous equation Example
- The self fibre product of the quadratic cover Example
- A smooth group of multiplicative type is the only closed subscheme containing all its finite subgroups Lemma
- A transverse hyperplane slice is smooth at the chosen point Lemma
- Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action Lemma
- Affine morphisms are separated Lemma
- Affineness of a field form of a diagonalizable group Lemma
- Base change and composition of affine morphisms Lemma
- Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change Lemma
- Completion base change preserves completed local rings on the closed fibre Lemma
- Dense relative-dimension strata in flat finitely presented fibres Lemma
- Every scheme diagonal is an immersion Lemma
- Fibres of the orbit map and the scheme-theoretic stabilizer as a closed subgroup scheme Lemma
- Finite Galois descent of morphisms of schemes Lemma
- Finite is affine and local on its target Lemma
- Finite morphisms survive base change and composition Lemma
- Finite neighbourhood of an isolated fibre point after elementary etale change Lemma
- Finite projective complex for proper flat coherent cohomology Lemma
- Finite-stage descent of finitely presented schemes and their morphisms Lemma
- Flat base change for quasi-coherent surface cohomology by Čech Lemma
- Flat deformations form a Zariski sheaf of groupoids Lemma
- Flat field extension commutes with coherent cohomology Lemma
…and 31 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Vakil 10.1.B; Stacks 26.17.2 (standard reference, not scraped)